Kruse Teresa, Portegys Sara, Leflerovà Diana, Cap Annette, Wirth Brunhilde, Heller Raoul, Neuhoff Svenja, Hagenacker Tim, Braumann Bert, Wunderlich Gilbert
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Center for Rare Diseases Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00597-8.
In advanced stages of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), established motor scores are unable to distinguish between the different degrees of remaining motor function. Bulbar muscles are affected at a later stage. The aim of the present study was to test whether oral function tests are able to better discriminate motor function than established scores and to replicate known associations between disease-related altered craniofacial anatomy and oral dysfunction in SMA.
A total of 43 adult individuals with SMA (mean age 39.7 ± 12; 25 men, 18 women) were included in this prospective, cross-sectional study. Oral function was measured using a piezoelectric sensor system and an Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) device. Data from oral function tests and established motor scores were analyzed with regard to a possible floor or ceiling effect. It was tested to what extent SMA patients with different malocclusions presented with variable scores.
Patients differed in ambulatory and treatment status (15 ambulatory vs. 28 nonambulatory; 35 treated vs. 8 nontreated) and orthodontic findings (22 with a class II molar relationship and increased overjet, 35 with posterior crossbite). In contrast to the oral function tests, some of the established motor scores showed a clear floor effect. Statistically significant associations were identified between reduced oral function values and an enlarged overjet, a class II molar relationship, and a posterior crossbite. This should be taken into account in neuromuscular evaluations.
In severely affected patients, oral function tests appear to be superior to established motor scores and fill a diagnostic gap in research and clinical practice.
在脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)晚期,现有的运动评分无法区分剩余运动功能的不同程度。延髓肌肉在后期受到影响。本研究的目的是测试口腔功能测试是否比现有的评分更能有效区分运动功能,并复制SMA中疾病相关的颅面解剖结构改变与口腔功能障碍之间已知的关联。
本前瞻性横断面研究共纳入43例成年SMA患者(平均年龄39.7±12岁;25例男性,18例女性)。使用压电传感器系统和爱荷华口腔功能仪器(IOPI)设备测量口腔功能。分析口腔功能测试数据和现有的运动评分,以确定是否存在可能的地板效应或天花板效应。测试了不同错牙合的SMA患者在多大程度上表现出不同的评分。
患者在行走和治疗状态(15例可行走 vs. 28例不可行走;35例接受治疗 vs. 8例未接受治疗)以及正畸检查结果(22例为II类磨牙关系且覆盖加大,35例为后牙反牙合)方面存在差异。与口腔功能测试不同,一些现有的运动评分显示出明显的地板效应。在口腔功能值降低与覆盖加大、II类磨牙关系和后牙反牙合之间发现了具有统计学意义的关联。在神经肌肉评估中应考虑到这一点。
在严重受影响的患者中,口腔功能测试似乎优于现有的运动评分,并填补了研究和临床实践中的诊断空白。