Iino Haru, Kizaki Hayato, Imai Shungo, Hori Satoko
Division of Drug Informatics, Faculty of Pharmacy and Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Keio University, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan, 81 3-5400-2650.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 24;9:e72113. doi: 10.2196/72113.
Declining medication adherence remains a critical health care issue, often assessed through unreliable self-reporting methods. Wearable devices (WDs) may offer an objective means to improve adherence monitoring by continuously recording physiological and activity data.
This study aimed to develop and internally validate personalized predictive models, utilizing objective physiological and activity data from WDs, for identifying missed medication doses.
A 30-day prospective observational study was conducted with 8 participants who wore Apple Watches and used a dedicated iOS app. The app collected demographics, medication details, psychological factors, mealtimes, and daily missed dose events. WDs recorded time-series data (ie, activity, heart rate, sleep) at 3-minute intervals. Data were aggregated into 1-hour segments, and lag (6 and 12 h) as well as rolling (24 h) features were generated. Light Gradient Boosting Machine models were constructed for each individual's dosing regimen if the missed dose rate exceeded 20%. Two modeling approaches were compared: a group cross-validation (CV) model that grouped data by day to avoid data leakage from rolling features, and a nonrolling feature model that excluded rolling features and used leave-one-out CV. F1-score, accuracy, recall, and precision were assessed between the 2 models.
Of the 15 enrolled participants, 8 completed the study; 4 had a missed dose rate above 20%. In these 4 individuals, the group CV model achieved F1-scores of 0.435 to 0.902, with accuracy ranging from 0.711 to 0.911, recall from 0.278 to 0.822, and a precision of 1.000 for the most robust regimens. The nonrolling feature model yielded F1-scores of 0.667 to 0.910, with accuracy ranging from 0.800 to 0.906, recall from 0.500 to 0.835, and a precision of 1.000. Morning dosing regimens generally showed higher predictive performance than evening or afternoon. Time-series features, particularly those reflecting 6-, 12-, and 24-hour patterns, emerged as key predictors, indicating that physiological and lifestyle variations prior to dosing strongly influenced missed dose events.
Personalized predictive models using WD-derived data demonstrated high precision for detecting missed medication doses, especially in morning and evening regimens. These findings underscore the feasibility of employing continuous, objective physiological and activity data from WDs to forecast nonadherence events. Although the sample size was limited, restricting the generalizability of the results, this study demonstrates the potential of WD-based personalized prediction of medication adherence. Future work should involve larger populations for external validation, strategies to improve recall, especially for clinically critical medications, and careful consideration of real-world implementation challenges.
药物依从性下降仍然是一个关键的医疗保健问题,通常通过不可靠的自我报告方法进行评估。可穿戴设备(WDs)可能提供一种客观手段,通过持续记录生理和活动数据来改善依从性监测。
本研究旨在开发并在内部验证个性化预测模型,利用来自可穿戴设备的客观生理和活动数据来识别漏服药物剂量。
对8名佩戴苹果手表并使用专用iOS应用程序的参与者进行了为期30天的前瞻性观察研究。该应用程序收集了人口统计学、药物细节、心理因素、用餐时间和每日漏服剂量事件。可穿戴设备以3分钟的间隔记录时间序列数据(即活动、心率、睡眠)。数据被汇总为1小时的时间段,并生成滞后(6小时和12小时)以及滚动(24小时)特征。如果漏服剂量率超过20%,则为每个个体的给药方案构建轻梯度提升机模型。比较了两种建模方法:一种是按天对数据进行分组以避免滚动特征的数据泄漏的组交叉验证(CV)模型,另一种是排除滚动特征并使用留一法交叉验证的非滚动特征模型。评估了这两种模型之间的F1分数、准确性、召回率和精确率。
在15名登记参与者中,8人完成了研究;4人的漏服剂量率高于20%。在这4个人中,组交叉验证模型的F1分数为0.435至0.902,准确性范围为0.711至0.911,召回率为0.278至0.822,对于最强健的给药方案精确率为1.000。非滚动特征模型的F1分数为0.667至0.910,准确性范围为0.800至0.906,召回率为0.500至0.835,精确率为1.000。早晨给药方案通常比晚上或下午的给药方案显示出更高的预测性能。时间序列特征,特别是那些反映6小时、12小时和24小时模式的特征,成为关键预测因素,表明给药前的生理和生活方式变化强烈影响漏服剂量事件。
使用来自可穿戴设备的数据的个性化预测模型在检测漏服药物剂量方面显示出高精度,特别是在早晨和晚上的给药方案中。这些发现强调了利用来自可穿戴设备的连续、客观的生理和活动数据来预测不依从事件的可行性。尽管样本量有限,限制了结果的普遍性,但本研究证明了基于可穿戴设备的药物依从性个性化预测的潜力。未来的工作应涉及更大规模的人群进行外部验证,提高召回率的策略,特别是对于临床关键药物,以及仔细考虑实际实施中的挑战。