Wu H H, Yi J W, Hu Z G, Zhou B H, Guan J F, Yan J L, Yu X, Yuan R F, Zou S B, Wang K
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Aug 1;63(8):732-737. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20241228-00596.
To explore the application value of real-time virtual sonography (RVS) combined with intraductal biliary contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IB-CEUS) in percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD). This retrospective cohort study included data from 71 patients who underwent PTCD at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between May 2021 and August 2022. There were 36 male and 35 female patients,aged 35 to 94 years. Based on the guidance modality used,patients were divided into two groups: the RVS combined with IB-CEUS group (=36) and the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) group (=35). PTCD was performed under the guidance of RVS combined with IB-CEUS in the RVS+IB-CEUS group,and under conventional DSA fluoroscopic guidance in the DSA group. Two clinicians classified the biliary conditions as either simple or complex based on preoperative ultrasound and CT (or MRI) imaging. Statistical analyses were conducted using independent sample -tests,rank-sum tests, tests,or Fisher's exact tests,as appropriate. Significant differences were observed between the RVS+IB-CEUS group and the DSA group in terms of the number of punctures (1.0±0.2 2.2±1.4,=-5.148,<0.01) and postoperative complication rate(2.8% (1/35) 17.1% (6/36),=0.049). There were 9 patients with complex biliary conditions in the DSA group and 12 in the RVS+IB-CEUS group. The number of punctures in both the simple and complex subgroups of the RVS+IB-CEUS group(1.0±0.2 and 1.0±0.0) remained lower than that in the corresponding DSA subgroups(2.2±1.6 and 2.4±0.4) (=-3.606,<0.01;=-3.959,=0.002). Moreover,the complication rate in the simple biliary subgroup of the RVS+IB-CEUS group was significantly lower than that of the DSA group(0 (0/24) 19.2% (5/26), =0.031),whereas no significant difference was found in the complex biliary subgroup (1/12 1/9,=0.686). Guided by RVS and IB-CEUS, PTCD can help reduce the number of punctures during surgery and postoperative complications, and patients with complex bile duct conditions can still benefit from PTCD.
探讨实时虚拟超声(RVS)联合胆管内超声造影(IB-CEUS)在经皮肝穿刺胆管引流术(PTCD)中的应用价值。本回顾性队列研究纳入了2021年5月至2022年8月在南昌大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科接受PTCD治疗的71例患者的数据。其中男性36例,女性35例,年龄35至94岁。根据所使用的引导方式,将患者分为两组:RVS联合IB-CEUS组(n = 36)和数字减影血管造影(DSA)组(n = 35)。RVS+IB-CEUS组在RVS联合IB-CEUS引导下进行PTCD,DSA组在传统DSA透视引导下进行。两名临床医生根据术前超声和CT(或MRI)成像将胆管情况分为简单或复杂两类。根据情况进行独立样本t检验、秩和检验、χ²检验或Fisher精确检验。RVS+IB-CEUS组与DSA组在穿刺次数(1.0±0.2 vs 2.2±1.4,t = -5.148,P<0.01)和术后并发症发生率(2.8%(1/35)vs 17.1%(6/36),χ² = 0.049)方面存在显著差异。DSA组有9例复杂胆管情况患者,RVS+IB-CEUS组有12例。RVS+IB-CEUS组简单和复杂亚组的穿刺次数(1.0±0.2和1.0±0.0)均低于相应DSA亚组(2.2±1.6和2.4±0.4)(t = -3.606,P<0.01;t = -3.959,P = 0.002)。此外,RVS+IB-CEUS组简单胆管亚组的并发症发生率显著低于DSA组(0(0/24)vs 19.2%(5/26),χ² = 0.031),而复杂胆管亚组未发现显著差异(1/12 vs 1/9,χ² = 0.686)。在RVS和IB-CEUS引导下,PTCD有助于减少手术中的穿刺次数和术后并发症,复杂胆管情况的患者仍可从PTCD中获益。