Booka Eisuke, Takeuchi Hiroya, Sakai Yuki, Haneda Ryoma, Soneda Wataru, Murakami Tomohiro, Matsumoto Tomohiro, Morita Yoshifumi, Kikuchi Hirotoshi, Hiramatsu Yoshihiro, Ferguson Mark K
From the Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Division of Surgical Care, Morimachi, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jun 13;6(2):e587. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000587. eCollection 2025 Jun.
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis evaluated how the number of lymph nodes dissected (LND) and the positive lymph node ratio (LNR) following esophagectomy influence long-term outcomes in esophageal cancer. BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is a critical treatment for esophageal cancer, but the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy remains debated, especially in the era of modern neoadjuvant protocols. METHODS: A systematic electronic search of Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library was performed for studies published between 2000 and 2024. Included studies assess overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy, comparing groups with high and low LND and LNR. A subset analysis examined outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: In total, 18 and 19 articles were included in the LND and LNR meta-analyses, respectively. High LND and low LNR were associated with improved OS [LND: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.67-0.85, < 0.01; LNR: HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.33-0.47, < 0.001]. Subset analysis revealed that these survival benefits persisted in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (LND: HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.34-0.93, = 0.01; LNR: HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.15-0.39, < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the prognostic importance of high LND and low LNR in improving OS following esophagectomy, regardless of neoadjuvant therapy. Extensive lymphadenectomy may enhance survival, and LNR provides a valuable prognostic tool for guiding postoperative treatment decisions.
目的:本荟萃分析评估了食管癌切除术后清扫淋巴结数量(LND)和阳性淋巴结比率(LNR)如何影响食管癌的长期预后。 背景:食管癌切除术是食管癌的关键治疗方法,但淋巴结清扫的最佳范围仍存在争议,尤其是在现代新辅助治疗方案的时代。 方法:对Embase、Medline和Cochrane图书馆进行系统的电子检索,以查找2000年至2024年发表的研究。纳入的研究评估了接受食管癌切除术并进行淋巴结清扫的患者的总生存期(OS),比较了LND和LNR高、低的组。一项亚组分析检查了接受新辅助治疗患者的预后。 结果:LND和LNR的荟萃分析分别共纳入18篇和19篇文章。高LND和低LNR与改善OS相关[LND:风险比(HR)=0.75,95%置信区间(CI)=0.67 - 0.85,P<0.01;LNR:HR = 0.39,95%CI = 0.33 - 0.47,P<0.001]。亚组分析显示,这些生存益处存在于接受新辅助治疗的患者中(LND:HR = 0.56,95%CI = 0.34 - 0.93,P = 0.01;LNR:HR = 0.24,95%CI = 0.15 - 0.39,P<0.001)。 结论:这些发现强调了高LND和低LNR在改善食管癌切除术后OS方面的预后重要性,无论是否接受新辅助治疗。广泛的淋巴结清扫可能提高生存率,LNR为指导术后治疗决策提供了有价值的预后工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001