文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

食管癌切除术后清扫淋巴结数量及阳性淋巴结比例对长期预后的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析

Impact of Dissected Lymph Node Count and Positive Lymph Node Ratio Following Esophagectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Booka Eisuke, Takeuchi Hiroya, Sakai Yuki, Haneda Ryoma, Soneda Wataru, Murakami Tomohiro, Matsumoto Tomohiro, Morita Yoshifumi, Kikuchi Hirotoshi, Hiramatsu Yoshihiro, Ferguson Mark K

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.

Division of Surgical Care, Morimachi, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jun 13;6(2):e587. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000587. eCollection 2025 Jun.


DOI:10.1097/AS9.0000000000000587
PMID:40557348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12185081/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis evaluated how the number of lymph nodes dissected (LND) and the positive lymph node ratio (LNR) following esophagectomy influence long-term outcomes in esophageal cancer. BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is a critical treatment for esophageal cancer, but the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy remains debated, especially in the era of modern neoadjuvant protocols. METHODS: A systematic electronic search of Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library was performed for studies published between 2000 and 2024. Included studies assess overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy, comparing groups with high and low LND and LNR. A subset analysis examined outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: In total, 18 and 19 articles were included in the LND and LNR meta-analyses, respectively. High LND and low LNR were associated with improved OS [LND: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.67-0.85, < 0.01; LNR: HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.33-0.47, < 0.001]. Subset analysis revealed that these survival benefits persisted in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (LND: HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.34-0.93, = 0.01; LNR: HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.15-0.39, < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the prognostic importance of high LND and low LNR in improving OS following esophagectomy, regardless of neoadjuvant therapy. Extensive lymphadenectomy may enhance survival, and LNR provides a valuable prognostic tool for guiding postoperative treatment decisions.

摘要

目的:本荟萃分析评估了食管癌切除术后清扫淋巴结数量(LND)和阳性淋巴结比率(LNR)如何影响食管癌的长期预后。 背景:食管癌切除术是食管癌的关键治疗方法,但淋巴结清扫的最佳范围仍存在争议,尤其是在现代新辅助治疗方案的时代。 方法:对Embase、Medline和Cochrane图书馆进行系统的电子检索,以查找2000年至2024年发表的研究。纳入的研究评估了接受食管癌切除术并进行淋巴结清扫的患者的总生存期(OS),比较了LND和LNR高、低的组。一项亚组分析检查了接受新辅助治疗患者的预后。 结果:LND和LNR的荟萃分析分别共纳入18篇和19篇文章。高LND和低LNR与改善OS相关[LND:风险比(HR)=0.75,95%置信区间(CI)=0.67 - 0.85,P<0.01;LNR:HR = 0.39,95%CI = 0.33 - 0.47,P<0.001]。亚组分析显示,这些生存益处存在于接受新辅助治疗的患者中(LND:HR = 0.56,95%CI = 0.34 - 0.93,P = 0.01;LNR:HR = 0.24,95%CI = 0.15 - 0.39,P<0.001)。 结论:这些发现强调了高LND和低LNR在改善食管癌切除术后OS方面的预后重要性,无论是否接受新辅助治疗。广泛的淋巴结清扫可能提高生存率,LNR为指导术后治疗决策提供了有价值的预后工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714a/12185081/98cdf27cae08/as9-6-e587-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714a/12185081/452a78898551/as9-6-e587-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714a/12185081/3951b720a59b/as9-6-e587-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714a/12185081/78a83905eb66/as9-6-e587-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714a/12185081/98cdf27cae08/as9-6-e587-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714a/12185081/452a78898551/as9-6-e587-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714a/12185081/3951b720a59b/as9-6-e587-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714a/12185081/78a83905eb66/as9-6-e587-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714a/12185081/98cdf27cae08/as9-6-e587-g004.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Impact of Dissected Lymph Node Count and Positive Lymph Node Ratio Following Esophagectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ann Surg Open. 2025-6-13

[2]
Development and validation of a prognostic model for overall survival in pN0 esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a SEER database-based study.

J Thorac Dis. 2025-5-30

[3]
Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-2

[4]
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6

[5]
Survival outcomes with pelvic node dissection after partial cystectomy among octogenarians with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Can J Urol. 2025-6-27

[6]
Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-22

[7]
Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025-7

[8]
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-26

[9]
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-4

[10]
Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001

本文引用的文献

[1]
Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes during Esophagectomy Affects the Outcome of Stage III Esophageal Cancer in Patients Having Had Pre-Operative Chemo-Radiation Therapy.

Curr Oncol. 2024-9-25

[2]
Doublet chemotherapy, triplet chemotherapy, or doublet chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer (JCOG1109 NExT): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet. 2024-7-6

[3]
Positive lymph node ratio is an important index to predict long-term survival for advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma patients (II∼III) with R0 resection--a SEER-based analysis.

Heliyon. 2023-11-27

[4]
Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Biomol Biomed. 2024-1-3

[5]
The Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

J Surg Res. 2023-12

[6]
What is the best reconstruction procedure after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis comparing posterior mediastinal and retrosternal approaches.

Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023-5-2

[7]
Lymph node ratio precisely predicts the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Asian J Surg. 2023-9

[8]
Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 2.

Esophagus. 2023-7

[9]
Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1.

Esophagus. 2023-7

[10]
Prognostic value of recurrence pattern in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Results from the phase III trial NEOCRTEC5010.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索