• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人危重症患者血糖管理循证方案的实施:一项试点研究。

Implementation of an Evidence-Based Protocol for Blood Glucose Management in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Huang Miao, Li Dongxue, Zhang Chuanlai, Yang Ruiqi, Bai Xue, Gan Xiuni

机构信息

Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

School of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70080. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70080.

DOI:10.1111/nicc.70080
PMID:40557786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12188630/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients are prone to stress hyperglycaemia, which can negatively impact clinical outcomes at high blood glucose levels. Evidence-based blood glucose management practices to improve patient outcomes should be explored.

AIM

This pilot study aimed to implement an evidence-based glycaemic management protocol for critically ill adults and assess its impact on ICU nurses' knowledge, attitudes, behaviours as well as healthcare professionals' adherence and patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This quasi-experimental study included a controlled pre-post pilot study that was conducted from April to June 2023 in a general ICU. An evidence-based glycaemic management protocol was developed for critically ill adults using the Rosswurm and Larrabee model for evidence-based practice change. The study cohort ultimately comprised 48 ICU nurses who completed both pre- and post-implementation surveys and 61 patients (control group, 34; intervention group, 27). ICU nurses' knowledge, attitudes and behaviours; healthcare providers' compliance; and patients' clinical outcomes were measured to assess the effectiveness of the intervention.

RESULTS

After implementing the intervention, ICU nurses' knowledge, attitudes and behaviours toward glycaemic management significantly improved. Among the 38 indicators of healthcare providers' compliance, 12 showed a 0%-100% improvement rate post-implementation and 8 showed a compliance rate increase of 5.9%-66.7%. Statistically significant improvements were found in the duration of hyperglycaemia (t = 2.841, p < 0.05, 95% CI [4.15, 24.46]), time to reach target glucose levels (t = -2.215, p < 0.05, 95% CI [-12.02, -0.61]) and rate of complications (χ = 4.325, p < 0.05) among patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence-based glycaemic management protocol for critically ill adults is feasible and effective for clinical use. The Rosswurm and Larrabee model was useful for guiding the implementation of the protocol in mainland China.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This pilot study provides a reference for blood glucose management in critically ill patients. Through structured training and procedural refinements, it facilitated the optimization of clinical workflows for glycaemic control, promoting a paradigm shift from experience-based to evidence-driven nursing practices among ICU nurses.

摘要

背景

重症患者易出现应激性高血糖,高血糖水平会对临床结局产生负面影响。应探索基于证据的血糖管理措施以改善患者结局。

目的

本试点研究旨在为成年重症患者实施基于证据的血糖管理方案,并评估其对重症监护病房(ICU)护士的知识、态度、行为以及医护人员的依从性和患者结局的影响。

研究设计

这项准实验研究包括一项对照前后试点研究,于2023年4月至6月在一家综合ICU进行。使用罗斯沃姆和拉腊比循证实践变革模型,为成年重症患者制定了基于证据的血糖管理方案。研究队列最终包括48名完成实施前后调查的ICU护士和61名患者(对照组34名;干预组27名)。通过测量ICU护士的知识、态度和行为;医护人员的依从性;以及患者的临床结局来评估干预措施的有效性。

结果

实施干预后,ICU护士对血糖管理的知识、态度和行为有显著改善。在医护人员依从性的38项指标中,12项在实施后改善率为0%-100%,8项依从率提高了5.9%-66.7%。患者的高血糖持续时间(t = 2.841,p < 0.05,95%可信区间[4.15, 24.46])、达到目标血糖水平的时间(t = - 2.215,p < 0.05,95%可信区间[-12.02, -0.61])和并发症发生率(χ = 4.325,p < 0.05)有统计学意义的改善。

结论

成年重症患者基于证据的血糖管理方案在临床应用中是可行且有效的。罗斯沃姆和拉腊比模型有助于指导该方案在中国大陆的实施。

与临床实践的相关性

本试点研究为重症患者的血糖管理提供了参考。通过结构化培训和流程优化,促进了血糖控制临床工作流程的优化,推动ICU护士从经验型护理实践向循证护理实践的模式转变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2169/12188630/102017e8cc1f/NICC-30-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2169/12188630/d69d9438ef4a/NICC-30-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2169/12188630/102017e8cc1f/NICC-30-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2169/12188630/d69d9438ef4a/NICC-30-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2169/12188630/102017e8cc1f/NICC-30-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of an Evidence-Based Protocol for Blood Glucose Management in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Pilot Study.成人危重症患者血糖管理循证方案的实施:一项试点研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70080. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70080.
2
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
3
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
4
Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) for critically ill adults in the intensive care unit.对重症监护病房中的成年重症患者进行早期干预(活动或主动锻炼)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 27;3(3):CD010754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010754.pub2.
5
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.
6
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.青少年医疗护理从儿科服务向成人健康服务的过渡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2.
7
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
8
Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses.利用手机短信促进慢性病自我管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2.
9
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.危重症 COVID-19 患者的早期与晚期气管切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 20;11(11):CD015532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015532.
10
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Glucose management in critically ill adults: A qualitative study from the experiences of health care providers.危重症成年患者的血糖管理:一项基于医护人员经验的定性研究
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 23;10(3):e24545. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24545. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
2
16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.16. 医院中的糖尿病护理:2024 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S295-S306. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S016.
3
Expert consensus on the glycemic management of critically ill patients.
危重症患者血糖管理专家共识
J Intensive Med. 2022 Jul 8;2(3):131-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.06.001. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
JBI's approach to evidence implementation: a 7-phase process model to support and guide getting evidence into practice.JBI 实施证据的方法:一个支持和指导将证据应用于实践的 7 阶段过程模型。
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Mar 1;21(1):3-13. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000361.
5
Clinical challenges of glycemic control in the intensive care unit: A narrative review.重症监护病房血糖控制的临床挑战:一项叙述性综述。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Nov 6;10(31):11260-11272. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11260.
6
Stress-Induced Hyperglycemia: Consequences and Management.应激性高血糖:后果与管理
Cureus. 2022 Jul 10;14(7):e26714. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26714. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Nurse led protocols for control of glycaemia in critically ill patients: A systematic review.护士主导的危重症患者血糖控制方案:系统评价。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Aug;71:103247. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103247. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
8
Experiences of nurse managers and practitioners on implementation of an evidence-based practice intervention.护士长和执业护士在实施循证实践干预措施方面的经验。
Health SA. 2022 Feb 28;27:1597. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1597. eCollection 2022.
9
A qualitative exploration of nurse-physician collaboration in intensive care units.重症监护病房护士-医师合作的定性研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Jun;70:103218. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103218. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
Shared decision-making in the ICU from the perspective of physicians, nurses and patients: a qualitative interview study.重症监护室中从医生、护士和患者角度出发的共同决策:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 11;11(8):e050134. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050134.