Brown Leanne M, Wilkins Sarah G, Bansal Varun V, Su David G, Gomez-Mayorga Jorge, Turaga Kiran K, Gunderson Craig G, Lee Byrne, Nash Garrett M, Hays John L, Raghav Kanwal P, Husain Aliya L, Kluger Michael D, Zauderer Marjorie G, Kindler Hedy L, Alexander H Richard
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;131(13):e35868. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35868.
The treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM) poses significant challenges because of its rare incidence, heterogeneity, and limited clinical evidence. This commentary describes results from a national consensus aimed at addressing the management of PeM. An update of the 2018 Chicago consensus guidelines was conducted with a modified Delphi technique, which encompassed two rounds of voting. The levels of agreement for various pathway blocks were assessed. Of 101 participants responding in the first round of modified Delphi voting, 95 (94%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in five of six and six of six pathway blocks in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Observation was recommended for benign neoplasms, with guidance for interventions in the presence of symptoms or concerning clinicopathological features. For malignant pathology, management was outlined on the basis of a multidisciplinary assessment of patient characteristics, disease histology, and predictive success of medical and surgical interventions. Additional emphasis was placed on multimodal therapy for intermediate-risk and appropriate high-risk patients. A rapid review demonstrated the limited availability of data and inconclusive findings regarding optimal systemic therapy timing. There was unanimous support for considering clinical trial enrollment. Given the limited evidence, the consensus-driven pathway provides essential guidance regarding the management of PeM. To further direct clinical care, additional dedicated research to generate higher quality evidence is needed.
由于腹膜间皮瘤(PeM)发病率低、异质性高且临床证据有限,其治疗面临重大挑战。本评论描述了一项旨在解决PeM管理问题的全国性共识的结果。采用改良德尔菲技术对2018年芝加哥共识指南进行了更新,该技术包括两轮投票。评估了各种路径模块的一致程度。在第一轮改良德尔菲投票中有101名参与者回复,其中95名(94%)在第二轮回复。在第一轮和第二轮投票中,六个路径模块中的五个和六个路径模块分别达成了超过90%的共识。对于良性肿瘤,建议进行观察,并针对出现症状或具有可疑临床病理特征时的干预提供指导。对于恶性病变,根据对患者特征、疾病组织学以及药物和手术干预预测成功率的多学科评估概述了管理方法。特别强调了对中风险和适当高风险患者的多模式治疗。一项快速综述表明,关于最佳全身治疗时机的数据有限且结果尚无定论。对于考虑纳入临床试验,大家一致表示支持。鉴于证据有限,基于共识的路径为PeM的管理提供了重要指导。为了进一步指导临床护理,需要开展更多专门研究以产生更高质量的证据。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-6-25
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-6-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-8