• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对支持精神病学中药物基因组检测支付方覆盖决策的真实世界证据及其他来源的评估。

An Assessment of Real-World Evidence and Other Sources Supporting Payer Coverage Decisions for Pharmacogenomic Testing in Psychiatry.

作者信息

Yankah Sandra E, Nafie Maryam, Hendricks-Sturrup Rachele M, Lu Christine Y

机构信息

Duke-Robert J. Margolis, MD, Institute for Health Policy, Washington, DC 20004, USA.

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):232. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060232.

DOI:10.3390/jpm15060232
PMID:40559095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12194790/
Abstract

Sources and evidence cited to inform payer coverage decisions on pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing in psychiatry are presently underexplored. We conducted a qualitative and quantitative assessment of publicly available coverage policies from 14 US payers, examining the number and both the type and source of citations across policies and coverage decisions. Payers were classified as for-profit or mutual fund versus non-profit or government, and their coverage decisions were categorized as either coverage (limited or specified) or no coverage. Among 32 unique sources cited, peer-reviewed literature as a single source was most frequently cited across all policies. Of 207 peer-reviewed papers cited across all policies, 40% ( = 83) were psychiatry-specific real-world evidence (RWE) studies. No statistically significant relationships were observed when comparing variance in the number of citations per policy by payer type ( = 0.22) or coverage decision ( = 0.75; unadjusted variance of 61.25 and an adjusted variance of 60.98 for both comparisons). For-profit or mutual fund payers and/or payers providing no coverage cited systematic reviews and non-randomized controlled cohort RWE studies most often. Non-profit or government payers and/or payers providing coverage cited case series or case-control RWE studies most often. Six psychiatry-specific RWE studies and contributions from 13 distinct sources were often cited, regardless of payer type or coverage decision. RWE, among several sources, are cited in many forms and to varying degrees among payers providing coverage decisions for PGx testing in psychiatry, with coverage determinations being largely based on how certain payers interpret evidence on the clinical value of testing.

摘要

目前,用于为精神病学领域药物基因组学(PGx)检测的医保覆盖决策提供信息的来源和证据尚未得到充分探索。我们对14家美国医保机构公开的覆盖政策进行了定性和定量评估,研究了各项政策及覆盖决策中引用的数量、类型和来源。医保机构被分为营利性或共同基金型与非营利性或政府型,其覆盖决策被归类为覆盖(有限或特定)或不覆盖。在被引用的32个独特来源中,同行评审文献作为单一来源在所有政策中被引用的频率最高。在所有政策中引用的207篇同行评审论文中,40%(= 83篇)是精神病学领域的真实世界证据(RWE)研究。比较不同医保机构类型(= 0.22)或覆盖决策(= 0.75;两种比较的未调整方差均为61.25,调整后方差均为60.98)下每项政策引用数量的差异时,未观察到统计学上的显著关系。营利性或共同基金型医保机构和/或不提供覆盖的医保机构最常引用系统评价和非随机对照队列RWE研究。非营利性或政府型医保机构和/或提供覆盖的医保机构最常引用病例系列或病例对照RWE研究。无论医保机构类型或覆盖决策如何,六项精神病学领域的RWE研究以及13个不同来源的贡献经常被引用。在为精神病学领域PGx检测提供覆盖决策的医保机构中,RWE以多种形式被引用,且程度各异,覆盖决策很大程度上取决于某些医保机构如何解读检测临床价值的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9948/12194790/76b2fee81533/jpm-15-00232-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9948/12194790/76b2fee81533/jpm-15-00232-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9948/12194790/76b2fee81533/jpm-15-00232-g001a.jpg

相似文献

1
An Assessment of Real-World Evidence and Other Sources Supporting Payer Coverage Decisions for Pharmacogenomic Testing in Psychiatry.对支持精神病学中药物基因组检测支付方覆盖决策的真实世界证据及其他来源的评估。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):232. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060232.
2
Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.临床指南和支付方政策对慢性下腰痛融合治疗的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S144-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef5b4.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
6
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders.精神障碍患者随机试验中的对照干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):MR000050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000050.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Payer perspectives on genomic testing in the United States: A systematic literature review.美国医保支付方对基因检测的看法:一项系统文献综述
Genet Med. 2025 Feb;27(2):101329. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101329. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
A systematic review of pharmacogenetic testing to guide antipsychotic treatment.一项关于指导抗精神病药物治疗的药物遗传学检测的系统评价。
Nat Ment Health. 2024;2(5):616-626. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00240-2. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
3
When can real-world data generate real-world evidence?真实世界数据何时能产生真实世界证据?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;33(1):e5715. doi: 10.1002/pds.5715. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
4
HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of Hypothesis Evaluating Real-World Evidence Studies on Treatment Effects: A Good Practices Report of a Joint ISPE/ISPOR Task Force.协调一致的方案模板,以提高评估治疗效果的真实世界证据研究假设再现性:国际药物经济学与结果研究学会/国际真实世界证据协会联合工作组的良好实践报告。
Value Health. 2022 Oct;25(10):1663-1672. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.001.
5
Real-World Impact of a Pharmacogenomics-Enriched Comprehensive Medication Management Program.一项富含药物基因组学的综合药物管理计划的真实世界影响
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 8;12(3):421. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030421.
6
Assessing Payers' Preferences for Real-World Evidence in the United States: A Discrete Choice Experiment.评估美国支付者对真实世界证据的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2022 Mar;25(3):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
7
The Current Landscape and Emerging Applications for Real-World Data in Diagnostics and Clinical Decision Support and its Impact on Regulatory Decision Making.真实世界数据在诊断和临床决策支持中的当前状况与新兴应用及其对监管决策的影响
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Dec;112(6):1172-1182. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2565. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
8
PARC report: a health-systems focus on reimbursement and patient access to pharmacogenomics testing.PARC 报告:以报销和患者获取药物基因组学检测为重点的医疗体系。
Pharmacogenomics. 2020 Jul;21(11):785-796. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2019-0192. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
Use of Real-World Evidence in US Payer Coverage Decision-Making for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Tests: Challenges, Opportunities, and Potential Solutions.真实世界证据在基于下一代测序的检测美国支付方覆盖决策中的应用:挑战、机遇和潜在解决方案。
Value Health. 2020 May;23(5):540-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of a Pharmacogenetic Test to Guide Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder.指导治疗重度抑郁症的药物遗传学检测的成本效益。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Aug;24(8):726-734. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.8.726.