Tops-Welten Marion W, Ewals Lotte J S, van Hellemond Irene E G, Piek Jurgen M J, Lahaye Max J, De Hingh Ignace H J T, Nederend Joost, Luyer Misha D P
Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11762-3.
The gold standard for evaluating the presence and extent of peritoneal lesions is determining the surgical peritoneal cancer index (PCI). However, there is a growing need for non-invasive methods to assess peritoneal lesions. While the standardised and quantified PCI scoring system can be applied to imaging, the region definitions used for surgical PCI assessment are not directly applicable to radiological assessment.
To define region boundaries applicable to radiological PCI assessment.
A Delphi study was conducted among 88 international experts, including radiologists, surgeons and gynaecologists. Within a questionnaire, the proposed regions for radiological PCI evaluation were shown as overlays on a CT scan and 3D volumes. Participants rated their level of agreement for each structure and region boundary on a 5-point Likert scale in iterative rounds. Consensus was defined as > 75% agreement and < 15% disagreement, and major agreement was defined as 60-75% agreement.
In the first Delphi round, 45 experts participated, leading to consensus on 45 of 52 statements. Regions 3, 5, 7, and 9-12 required further refinement. In the second round, 40 experts participated, resulting in consensus on three additional structures/boundaries. For all remaining structures/boundaries, a major agreement was obtained. Final adjustments involved revising terminology for the lower boundaries of regions 5 and 7 and adopting more practical boundaries for regions 9-12 to ensure equal small bowel volumes in these regions.
This study defined region boundaries for radiological PCI assessment, facilitating a structured and practical approach for objective evaluation of peritoneal lesions on imaging.
Question There is a growing need for a non-invasive and standardised imaging method to assess the presence and extent of peritoneal lesions. Findings This Delphi study achieved expert consensus on most region boundaries for evaluating the radiological PCI, providing structured guidelines for imaging-based assessment of peritoneal lesions. Clinical relevance This study establishes imaging guidelines for assessing peritoneal lesions, enabling more consistent and objective patient evaluations in clinical practice, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures.
评估腹膜病变的存在和范围的金标准是确定手术腹膜癌指数(PCI)。然而,对评估腹膜病变的非侵入性方法的需求日益增长。虽然标准化和量化的PCI评分系统可应用于影像学检查,但用于手术PCI评估的区域定义并不直接适用于放射学评估。
定义适用于放射学PCI评估的区域边界。
对88名国际专家进行了德尔菲研究,这些专家包括放射科医生、外科医生和妇科医生。在一份问卷中,用于放射学PCI评估的拟议区域以CT扫描和三维容积上的覆盖图形式显示。参与者在多轮迭代中按照5级李克特量表对每个结构和区域边界的认同程度进行评分。共识定义为认同率>75%且分歧率<15%,主要认同定义为认同率60%-75%。
在第一轮德尔菲研究中,45名专家参与,对52条陈述中的45条达成了共识。区域3、5、7和9-12需要进一步细化。在第二轮中,40名专家参与,又对另外三个结构/边界达成了共识。对于所有其余的结构/边界,获得了主要认同。最后的调整包括修订区域5和7下边界的术语,并为区域9-12采用更实用的边界,以确保这些区域的小肠容积相等。
本研究定义了放射学PCI评估的区域边界,为在影像学上客观评估腹膜病变提供了一种结构化且实用的方法。
问题 对一种用于评估腹膜病变的存在和范围的非侵入性标准化成像方法的需求日益增长。研究结果 这项德尔菲研究就评估放射学PCI的大多数区域边界达成了专家共识,为基于影像学的腹膜病变评估提供了结构化指南。临床意义 本研究建立了评估腹膜病变的影像学指南,使临床实践中对患者的评估更加一致和客观,可能减少侵入性操作的需求。