Yuan Qianqian, Li Chengxin, Zhou Rui, Hou Jinxuan, Li Jinpeng, Wu Gaosong
Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251348423. doi: 10.1177/19160216251348423. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
ImportanceThe extent of surgical resection for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTCs) located in the isthmus has remained a matter of considerable debate.ObjectiveTo investigate the association between the extent of wide-field isthmusectomy and complications and recurrences.DesignClinicopathologic documents of patients who received total thyroidectomy and wide-field isthmusectomy were recorded.SettingA retrospective review study.ParticipantsPatients with single tumor in the isthmus with no cervical lymph node metastasis were selected.Intervention or ExposuresPatients received total thyroidectomy with neck dissection, or wide-field isthmusectomy with paratracheal and prelaryngeal lymph node dissection.Main Outcome MeasuresThe locoregional results, complications, and rate of patients who were not required to receive thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression therapy were compared.ResultsA total of 389 patients were included in the study and divided into 3 groups. One hundred and nineteen (30.6%) patients were performed with wide-field isthmusectomy with a distance <0.5 cm (Group I), and 190 (48.8%) patients with a distance ≥0.5 cm (Group II). Eighty (20.6%) underwent total thyroidectomy (Group III). Eighty (67.2%) of 119 patients in Group I and 125 (65.8%) of 190 patients in Group II did not take medication at the mean follow-up of 37 months. Locoregional recurrence developed in 22 patients (18.5%) of Group I, 16 (8.4%) patients of Group II, and 5 (2.6%) patients of Group III. The overall morbidity was 6 (5.0%) in Group I, 14 (7.4%) in Group II, and 21 (26.5%) in Group III.ConclusionsWide-field isthmusectomy with a 0.5 cm distance may be a sufficient treatment for selected patients with PTC limited to the isthmus.RelevanceWild-field isthmusectomy and limited neck dissection may be a sufficient procedure for isthmic PTC. Further research is needed to determine whether prophylactic central compartment neck dissection can be omitted during isthmusectomy for these patients.
重要性
位于甲状腺峡部的乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)的手术切除范围一直是一个备受争议的问题。
目的
探讨广泛峡部切除术范围与并发症及复发之间的关联。
设计
记录接受全甲状腺切除术和广泛峡部切除术患者的临床病理资料。
设置
一项回顾性研究。
参与者
选择峡部单发肿瘤且无颈部淋巴结转移的患者。
干预或暴露
患者接受全甲状腺切除术加颈部清扫术,或广泛峡部切除术加气管旁和喉前淋巴结清扫术。
主要观察指标
比较局部区域结果、并发症以及无需接受促甲状腺激素抑制治疗的患者比例。
结果
本研究共纳入389例患者,分为3组。119例(30.6%)患者接受了切缘距离<0.5 cm的广泛峡部切除术(I组),190例(48.8%)患者切缘距离≥0.5 cm(II组)。80例(20.6%)患者接受了全甲状腺切除术(III组)。I组119例患者中有80例(67.2%)、II组190例患者中有125例(65.8%)在平均37个月的随访期内未服用药物。I组22例(18.5%)患者、II组16例(8.4%)患者和III组5例(2.6%)患者发生局部区域复发。I组总体并发症发生率为6例(5.0%),II组为14例(7.4%),III组为21例(26.5%)。
结论
对于局限于峡部的PTC患者,切缘距离为0.5 cm的广泛峡部切除术可能是一种充分的治疗方法。
相关性
广泛峡部切除术和有限的颈部清扫术对于峡部PTC可能是一种充分的手术方式。需要进一步研究以确定这些患者在峡部切除术中是否可以省略预防性中央区颈部清扫术。