• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿治疗算法的前瞻性验证

Prospective validation of a therapeutic algorithm for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy.

作者信息

Rodríguez Piñero Jorge Nicolás, Casas María A, Angeramo Cristian A, Baz Gallego Juan José, Laxague Francisco, Schlottmann Francisco

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán, Av. Pueyrredón 1640, C1118AAT, Buenos AiresBuenos Aires, Argentina.

Department of Interventional Radiology, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):4929-4934. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11908-w. Epub 2025 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11908-w
PMID:40562956
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our center has previously proposed a therapeutic algorithm for the management of intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), based on the size and number of fluid collections. The aim of this study was to prospectively determine the safety and effectiveness of this algorithm.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients with IAA after LA from January 2019 to May 2024 was analyzed. Patients' treatment was defined based on size and number of collections: antibiotics only (ATB) for IAA smaller than 4 cm, percutaneous drainage (PERC) for IAA between 4 and 8 cm; and laparoscopic lavage and drainage (SURG) for multiple IAA and/or IAA larger than 8 cm. The primary outcome of the study was the success rate of each therapy (i.e., complete resolution of symptoms without the need for additional intervention). Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, major morbidity, mortality, and readmissions.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1000 LA were performed; 41 (4.1%) patients developed IAA and were treated according to the proposed algorithm. The mean time elapsed for IAA development was 7 (4-17) days. The most common symptoms were fever (80.4%) and abdominal pain (73.1%). Fifteen (36.5%) patients received intravenous antibiotics, 22 patients (53.6%) underwent percutaneous drainage, and 4 (9.7%) were treated with laparoscopic lavage. For the ATB Group, the success rate was 93.3%. The only patient who failed medical therapy required percutaneous drainage. The success rate for the PERC and SURG Groups was 100%. The median LOS was 2.0 (1-6) days, 3.5 (2-6) days, and 6 (4-8) days for the ATB, PERC and SURG groups, respectively (p < 0.05). No major morbidity or mortality was observed in the entire cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

A therapeutic algorithm for IAA after LA based on the size and number of fluid collections is safe and effective in the vast majority of patients.

摘要

背景

我们中心此前基于积液的大小和数量,提出了一种用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿(IAA)管理的治疗算法。本研究的目的是前瞻性地确定该算法的安全性和有效性。

方法

对2019年1月至2024年5月期间腹腔镜阑尾切除术后发生IAA的患者进行前瞻性队列分析。根据积液的大小和数量确定患者的治疗方案:对于小于4 cm的IAA仅使用抗生素(ATB)治疗;对于4至8 cm的IAA进行经皮引流(PERC);对于多发IAA和/或大于8 cm的IAA进行腹腔镜灌洗引流(SURG)。本研究的主要结局是每种治疗方法的成功率(即症状完全缓解且无需额外干预)。次要结局包括住院时间、严重并发症、死亡率和再入院率。

结果

在研究期间,共进行了1000例腹腔镜阑尾切除术;41例(4.1%)患者发生IAA,并根据所提出的算法进行治疗。IAA发生的平均时间为7(4 - 17)天。最常见的症状是发热(80.4%)和腹痛(73.1%)。15例(36.5%)患者接受了静脉抗生素治疗,22例(53.6%)患者接受了经皮引流,4例(9.7%)患者接受了腹腔镜灌洗治疗。ATB组的成功率为93.3%。唯一治疗失败的患者需要进行经皮引流。PERC组和SURG组的成功率为100%。ATB组、PERC组和SURG组的中位住院时间分别为2.0(1 - 6)天、3.5(2 - 6)天和6(4 - 8)天(p < 0.05)。整个队列中未观察到严重并发症或死亡。

结论

基于积液大小和数量的腹腔镜阑尾切除术后IAA治疗算法在绝大多数患者中是安全有效的。

相似文献

1
Prospective validation of a therapeutic algorithm for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿治疗算法的前瞻性验证
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):4929-4934. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11908-w. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
2
Abdominal drainage to prevent intraperitoneal abscess after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.阑尾切除术后放置腹腔引流以预防复杂性阑尾炎术后腹腔脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 11;4(4):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub5.
3
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):CD015038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015038.pub2.
4
Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.复杂性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后腹腔引流预防腹腔脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 17;8(8):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub4.
5
Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.对于复杂性阑尾炎行开腹阑尾切除术后,行腹腔引流以预防腹腔内脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub3.
6
Treatments for breast abscesses in breastfeeding women.哺乳期妇女乳房脓肿的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 17;2015(8):CD010490. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010490.pub2.
7
Is laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis ?A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎是否可行?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:187-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
8
Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.对于复杂性阑尾炎行开腹阑尾切除术后,进行腹腔引流以预防腹腔内脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 7(2):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub2.
9
Laparoscopic lavage versus surgical resection for acute diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜灌洗术与手术切除治疗伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的急性憩室炎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Feb;21(2):93-110. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1585-0. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
10
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 21;6(6):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Risk Assessment in Adults and Children.2024 年美国传染病学会发布的复杂性腹腔内感染临床实践指南更新:成人和儿童的风险评估。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 4;79(Supplement_3):S88-S93. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae347.
2
AbcApp: incidence of intra-abdominal ABsCesses following laparoscopic vs. open APPendectomy in complicated appendicitis.ABC 应用程序:复杂性阑尾炎腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术术后腹腔内 ABS 脓肿的发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1694-1699. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09670-4. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
The Management of Post-appendectomy Abscess in Children; A Historical Cohort Study and Update of the Literature.
儿童阑尾切除术后脓肿的管理;一项历史性队列研究及文献更新
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jun 20;10:908485. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.908485. eCollection 2022.
4
More Severe Presentations of Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19.COVID-19期间急性阑尾炎的更严重表现
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jul;25(7):1902-1904. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04892-0. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Acute Appendicitis During Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Changes in Clinical Presentation and CT Findings.急性阑尾炎在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)期间的表现变化:临床症状和 CT 表现。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Aug;17(8):1011-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
6
Intra-abdominal Abscess After Appendectomy-Are Drains Necessary in All Patients?阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿——所有患者都需要放置引流管吗?
J Surg Res. 2020 Oct;254:384-389. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.016. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
7
Non-operative management of small post-appendicectomy intra-abdominal abscess is safe and effective.经阑尾切除术后小的腹腔内脓肿的非手术治疗安全且有效。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Oct;90(10):1979-1983. doi: 10.1111/ans.16023. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Risk factors for intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study on 2076 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎后发生腹腔脓肿的危险因素:一项 2076 例患者的回顾性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):1175-1180. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00749-y. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
Minimally invasive step-up approach for the management of postoperative intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔脓肿的微创升级治疗方法。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):787-791. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07448-0. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
10
Early Laparoscopic Washout may Resolve Persistent Intra-abdominal Infection Post-appendicectomy.早期腹腔镜冲洗可能解决阑尾切除术后持续的腹腔内感染。
World J Surg. 2019 Apr;43(4):998-1006. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4871-8.