Suppr超能文献

原发性阑尾癌和结直肠癌腹膜转移的迭代细胞减灭术及腹腔热灌注化疗:一项观察性研究

Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Peritoneal Metastases from Primary Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancers: An Observational Study.

作者信息

Fleming Andrew M, Clark Owen M, Lee Jaewon J, Dougherty Kristen, Hendrick Leah E, Raine Jordan, Solsky Ian, Dickson Paxton V, Glazer Evan S, Shibata David, Gleeson Elizabeth, Munene Gitonga, Deneve Jeremiah L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.

Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;17(12):2014. doi: 10.3390/cancers17122014.

Abstract

: Peritoneal relapse after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is common. Repeat CRS/HIPEC offers the potential for long-term survival in the appropriately selected patient. : We performed a retrospective review of a single institution database to assess perioperative outcomes after repeat CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal (pAC) and colorectal (pCRC) cancers. Kaplan-Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival. : Of 157 patients, 103 patients underwent initial CRS/HIPEC for pAC ( = 67) or pCRC ( = 36) histologies. Twenty-seven pAC patients (27/67, 40%) and 23/36 pCRC patients (63%) developed disease recurrence. Relapsed patients had a higher burden of disease (PCI), operative length and blood loss and received adjuvant chemotherapy (all < 0.05). Nine of the 27 relapsed pAC patients and 5 of the 13 relapsed pCRC patients underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC. The median time to repeat CRS/HIPEC was 18 months (4-26 months), and a CCR-0 and CCR-1 were achieved in 79% and 21%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS for pAC patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC was 88.9%, 88.9% and 77.8%, and the 1- and 3-year OS for pCRC patients was 100% and 25%, respectively. Repeat CRS/HIPEC for pAC was associated with significant improvement in OS ( = 0.03), while for pCRC, no significant difference was observed ( = 0.99). : Repeat CRS/HIPEC for isolated peritoneal recurrence is safe and offers the potential for long-term survival. Patient selection is key to ensure optimal cytoreduction when considering repeat CRS/HIPEC.

摘要

细胞减灭术和腹腔内热灌注化疗(CRS/HIPEC)后腹膜复发很常见。对于经过适当选择的患者,重复进行CRS/HIPEC有长期生存的可能。:我们对单一机构数据库进行了回顾性分析,以评估阑尾癌(pAC)和结直肠癌(pCRC)患者重复CRS/HIPEC后的围手术期结局。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox模型评估生存率。:157例患者中,103例因pAC(n = 67)或pCRC(n = 36)组织学类型接受了初次CRS/HIPEC。27例pAC患者(27/67,40%)和23/36例pCRC患者(63%)出现疾病复发。复发患者的疾病负担(PCI)、手术时长和失血量更高,且接受了辅助化疗(均P < 0.05)。27例复发的pAC患者中有9例,13例复发的pCRC患者中有5例接受了重复CRS/HIPEC。重复CRS/HIPEC的中位时间为18个月(4 - 26个月),分别有79%和21%的患者达到CCR-0和CCR-1。接受重复CRS/HIPEC的pAC患者1年、3年和5年总生存率分别为88.9%、88.9%和77.8%,pCRC患者1年和3年总生存率分别为100%和25%。pAC患者重复CRS/HIPEC与总生存率显著改善相关(P = 0.03),而pCRC患者则未观察到显著差异(P = 0.99)。:对于孤立性腹膜复发,重复CRS/HIPEC是安全的,且有长期生存的可能。在考虑重复CRS/HIPEC时,患者选择是确保最佳细胞减灭的关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/12191129/bdd535f8003e/cancers-17-02014-g001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the palliative-procedure decision-making process for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: A secondary analysis.
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Sep;188:125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.014. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
3
Repeat CRS/HIPEC: It Comes Down to Tumor Biology and Ability to Achieve a Complete CRS.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;29(6):3366-3368. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11429-z. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
5
Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Recurrences is Safe and Efficacious.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):5330-5338. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09684-7. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验