Takeuchi Shinya, Okuhara Yoshiyasu, Hatakeyama Yutaka
Department of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku 783-8505, Kochi, Japan.
Centre of Medical Information Science, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku 783-8505, Kochi, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;15(12):1561. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121561.
: Diagnostic reasoning is essential in clinical practice and medical education, yet it often becomes an automated process, making its cognitive mechanisms less visible. Despite the widespread use of electronic medical records, few studies have quantitatively evaluated how clinicians' reasoning is documented in real-world electronic medical records. This study aimed to investigate whether initial electronic medical records contain valuable information for diagnostic reasoning and assess the feasibility of using text analysis and logistic regression to make this reasoning process visible. : We conducted a retrospective analysis of initial electronic medical records at Kochi University Hospital between 2008 and 2022. Two patient cohorts presenting with dizziness and headaches were analysed. Text analysis was performed using GiNZA, a Japanese natural language processing library, and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify associations with final diagnoses. : We identified 1277 dizziness cases, of which 248 were analysed, revealing 48 significant diagnostic terms. Moreover, we identified 1904 headache cases, of which 616 were analysed, revealing 46 significant diagnostic terms. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of specific terms, as well as whether they were expressed affirmatively or negatively, was significantly associated with diagnostic outcomes. : Initial EMRs contain quantifiable linguistic cues relevant to diagnostic reasoning. Even simple analytical methods can reveal reasoning patterns, offering valuable insights for medical education and supporting the development of explainable diagnostic support systems.
诊断推理在临床实践和医学教育中至关重要,但它常常变成一个自动化过程,使其认知机制不那么明显。尽管电子病历被广泛使用,但很少有研究定量评估临床医生的推理在实际电子病历中是如何记录的。本研究旨在调查初始电子病历是否包含诊断推理的有价值信息,并评估使用文本分析和逻辑回归使这一推理过程可见的可行性。
我们对高知大学医院2008年至2022年的初始电子病历进行了回顾性分析。分析了两个出现头晕和头痛症状的患者队列。使用日本自然语言处理库GiNZA进行文本分析,并进行逻辑回归分析以确定与最终诊断的关联。
我们识别出了1277例头晕病例,其中248例被分析,揭示了48个重要诊断术语。此外,我们识别出了1904例头痛病例,其中616例被分析,揭示了46个重要诊断术语。逻辑回归分析表明,特定术语的存在以及它们是肯定还是否定表达与诊断结果显著相关。
初始电子病历包含与诊断推理相关的可量化语言线索。即使是简单的分析方法也能揭示推理模式,为医学教育提供有价值的见解,并支持可解释诊断支持系统的开发。