Kim Billy I, Morriss Nicholas J, Stauffer Taylor P, Ralph Julia E, Park Caroline N, Lentz Trevor A, Lau Brian C
Duke Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 200 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 9;22(6):914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060914.
Psychological distress and musculoskeletal pain are interconnected with poor functional outcomes. This study sought to classify common phenotypes of psychological distress in an orthopaedic sports population and assess differences in functional outcomes using the Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO-YF) tool. This was a cross-sectional study on 411 operative patients from a single sports surgeon's clinical practice with completed OSPRO-YF questionnaires. Latent class analysis was employed to construct distress phenotypes based on binary measures for 11 single-construct psychological questionnaires, spanning two negative and one positive domains of pain-associated psychological distress. Functional outcome measures, including numerical pain scores, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), were compared. Four psychological distress clusters were derived: low distress (LD-1; = 111), low self-efficacy (LS-2; = 101), negative pain coping, low self-efficacy (NP-3; = 99), and high distress (HD-4; = 100), with increasing yellow flags proceeding from LD-1 to HD-4. The mean numerical pain scores were highest in HD-4 and lowest in LD-1 and LS-2 (4.6 vs. 2.7 and 2.0, respectively; < 0.001). The PROMIS depression scores were highest in HD-4 compared to NP-3, LS-2, and LD-1 (57.0 vs. 48.9 vs. 45.6 vs. 46.0; < 0.001). Phenotyping patients based on OSPRO-YF distress indicators provides an initial framework of the psychological distress burdening the average orthopaedic sports surgical patient population and may aid in targeted psychological treatments.
心理困扰与肌肉骨骼疼痛相互关联,且与功能预后不良有关。本研究旨在对骨科运动人群中常见的心理困扰表型进行分类,并使用转诊与预后预测(OSPRO-YF)工具评估功能预后的差异。这是一项横断面研究,研究对象为来自一位运动外科医生临床实践的411例手术患者,他们均完成了OSPRO-YF问卷。采用潜在类别分析,基于11份单结构心理问卷的二元测量构建困扰表型,这些问卷涵盖了与疼痛相关的心理困扰的两个消极领域和一个积极领域。比较了功能预后指标,包括数字疼痛评分、患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)、单项评估数字评价(SANE)美国肩肘外科医生评分(ASES)以及国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节表(IKDC)。得出了四个心理困扰类别:低困扰(LD-1;n = 111)、低自我效能感(LS-2;n = 101)、消极疼痛应对与低自我效能感(NP-3;n = 99)以及高困扰(HD-4;n = 100),从LD-1到HD-4,警示信号逐渐增加。HD-4组的平均数字疼痛评分最高,LD-1组和LS-2组最低(分别为4.6 vs. 2.7和2.0;P < 0.001)。与NP-3、LS-2和LD-1组相比,HD-4组的PROMIS抑郁评分最高(57.0 vs. 48.9 vs. 45.6 vs. 46.0;P < 0.001)。基于OSPRO-YF困扰指标对患者进行表型分析,为困扰骨科运动手术患者群体的心理困扰提供了一个初步框架,可能有助于进行有针对性的心理治疗。