Williams Ryan, Penington Ed, Gupta Veenu, Quirk Alan, Tsiachristas Apostolos, Rickett Michelle, Chew-Graham Carolyn A, Shiers David, French Paul, Lennox Belinda, Bottle Alex, Crawford Mike J
Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, UK.
Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 26:1-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2025.126.
Psychotic disorders are severe mental health conditions frequently associated with long-term disability, reduced quality of life and premature mortality. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide timely, comprehensive packages of care for people with psychotic disorders. However, it is not clear which components of EIP services contribute most to the improved outcomes they achieve.
We aimed to identify associations between specific components of EIP care and clinically significant outcomes for individuals treated for early psychosis in England.
This national retrospective cohort study of 14 874 EIP individuals examined associations between 12 components of EIP care and outcomes over a 3-year follow-up period, by linking data from the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP) to routine health outcome data held by NHS England. The primary outcome was time to relapse, defined as psychiatric inpatient admission or referral to a crisis resolution (home treatment) team. Secondary outcomes included duration of admissions, detention under the Mental Health Act, emergency department and general hospital attendances and mortality. We conducted multilevel regression analyses incorporating demographic and service-level covariates.
Smaller care coordinator case-loads and the use of clozapine for eligible people were associated with reduced relapse risk. Physical health interventions were associated with reductions in mortality risk. Other components, such as cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp), showed associations with improvements in secondary outcomes.
Smaller case-loads should be prioritised and protected in EIP service design and delivery. Initiatives to improve the uptake of clozapine should be integrated into EIP care. Other components, such as CBTp and physical health interventions, may have specific benefits for those eligible. These findings highlight impactful components of care and should guide resource allocation to optimise EIP service delivery.
精神障碍是严重的心理健康状况,常与长期残疾、生活质量下降和过早死亡相关。精神病早期干预(EIP)服务旨在为患有精神障碍的人提供及时、全面的护理套餐。然而,尚不清楚EIP服务的哪些组成部分对其所取得的改善结果贡献最大。
我们旨在确定EIP护理的特定组成部分与在英格兰接受早期精神病治疗的个体的临床显著结果之间的关联。
这项对14874名EIP个体的全国性回顾性队列研究,通过将精神病国家临床审计(NCAP)的数据与英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)英格兰持有的常规健康结果数据相链接,研究了EIP护理的12个组成部分与3年随访期内结果之间的关联。主要结局是复发时间,定义为精神病住院或转诊至危机解决(家庭治疗)团队。次要结局包括住院时间、根据《精神健康法》的拘留、急诊科和综合医院就诊情况以及死亡率。我们进行了纳入人口统计学和服务层面协变量的多水平回归分析。
较小的护理协调员工作量以及对符合条件的人使用氯氮平与复发风险降低相关。身体健康干预与死亡风险降低相关。其他组成部分,如精神病认知行为疗法(CBTp),与次要结局的改善相关。
在EIP服务的设计和提供中,应优先考虑并保护较小的工作量。提高氯氮平使用率的举措应纳入EIP护理。其他组成部分,如CBTp和身体健康干预,可能对符合条件的人有特定益处。这些发现突出了护理中有影响力的组成部分,并应指导资源分配以优化EIP服务的提供。