• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用多点骨水泥锚固技术的经皮椎体后凸成形术预防Ⅰ、Ⅱ期Kümmell病骨水泥移位的临床及影像学分析

Clinical and radiographical analysis of percutaneous kyphoplasty with multi-point cement anchoring technique for preventing bone cement displacement in Kümmell's disease of stage I and II.

作者信息

Wu Heng, Dai Xiao, Liu Hao, Yang Xiang, Liu Shenao, Xu Shuang, Chi Hao, Chen Yuquan, Wang Song

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.

Clinical Medical College, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 11;16:1538337. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1538337. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2025.1538337
PMID:40568562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12187816/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study introduced a novel technique called percutaneous kyphoplasty with multi-point cement anchoring technique (A-PKP) to prevent bone cement displacement in patients with stage I and II Kümmell's disease (KD).

METHODS

A total of 82 patients with stage I and II KD were treated with PKP in our hospital from April 2020 to October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: A-PKP group (N=39) where the Kirschner needle was used for the multi-point cement anchoring technique, and conventional transverse process-pedicle percutaneous kyphoplasty group (T-PKP group; N=43) where the Kirschner needle was not used. The operation time, volume of cement, VAS score, ODI score, cement distribution pattern and score, bone cement leakage, adjacent vertebra fracture, and bone cement displacement were compared between the two groups. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between outcome variables and adjacent vertebral fractures, as well as to identify potential protective and risk factors following kyphoplasty.

RESULTS

All patients in both groups were operated successfully, with no serious complications reported. Compared with T-PKP patients, A-PKP patients had longer operation time (39.7 ± 4.86 min vs. 34.5 ± 3.18 min, P < 0.05), greater volume of cement (5.1 ± 0.41 ml vs. 4.3 ± 0.27 ml, P < 0.05), greater improvement in Visual Analog Scale (2.0 ± 0.48, 1.92 ± 0.72 vs. 3.0 ± 0.10, 3.1 ± 0.62, P < 0.05) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (17.9 ± 2.38, 14.8 ± 2.02 vs. 20.2 ± 3.31, 17.2 ± 2.55, P < 0.05) during follow-ups, more spongy cement configuration with higher distribution scores (10.0 ± 1.17 vs. 7.74 ± 1.08, P < 0.05), lower incidence of bone cement leakage (20.5% vs. 27.9%, P > 0.05), and lower rate of adjacent vertebra fractures (5.1% vs. 18.6%, P < 0.05) and bone cement displacement (2.5% vs. 20.9%, P < 0.05). The logistic regression results reveal that bone cement distribution score (OR= 0.355, 95% CI 0.171-0.734, P=0.005) acts as protective factor of adjacent vertebral fractures following kyphoplasty.

CONCLUSION

The A-PKP technique appears to be a safer and more effective alternative for patients with stage I and II KD. It effectively alleviates pain, enhances cement diffusion, and minimizes the risk of bone cement displacement compared with the T-PKP.

摘要

背景

本研究引入了一种名为经皮椎体后凸成形术联合多点骨水泥锚固技术(A-PKP)的新技术,以预防I期和II期Kümmell病(KD)患者的骨水泥移位。

方法

2020年4月至2022年10月,我院共82例I期和II期KD患者接受了椎体后凸成形术(PKP)治疗。患者分为两组:A-PKP组(N = 39),采用克氏针进行多点骨水泥锚固技术;传统横突-椎弓根经皮椎体后凸成形术组(T-PKP组;N = 43),未使用克氏针。比较两组的手术时间、骨水泥用量、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、骨水泥分布模式及评分、骨水泥渗漏、相邻椎体骨折和骨水泥移位情况。采用逻辑回归模型评估结局变量与相邻椎体骨折之间的关联,并确定椎体后凸成形术后潜在的保护因素和风险因素。

结果

两组患者均手术成功,未报告严重并发症。与T-PKP组患者相比,A-PKP组患者手术时间更长(39.7±4.86分钟 vs. 34.5±3.18分钟,P < 0.05),骨水泥用量更大(5.1±0.41毫升 vs. 4.3±0.27毫升,P < 0.05),随访期间视觉模拟评分改善更明显(2.0±0.48,1.92±0.72 vs. 3.0±0.10,3.1±0.62,P < 0.05),Oswestry功能障碍指数评分改善更明显(17.9±2.38,14.8±2.02 vs. 20.2±3.31,17.2±2.55,P < 0.05),骨水泥呈海绵状结构且分布评分更高(10.0±1.17 vs. 7.74±1.08,P < 0.05),骨水泥渗漏发生率更低(20.5% vs. 27.9%,P > 0.05),相邻椎体骨折发生率更低(5.1% vs. 18.6%,P < 0.05),骨水泥移位率更低(2.5% vs. 20.9%,P < 0.05)。逻辑回归结果显示,骨水泥分布评分(OR = 0.355,95%CI 0.171 - 0.734,P = 0.005)是椎体后凸成形术后相邻椎体骨折的保护因素。

结论

对于I期和II期KD患者,A-PKP技术似乎是一种更安全、更有效的选择。与T-PKP相比,它能有效缓解疼痛,增强骨水泥扩散,并将骨水泥移位风险降至最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/125c/12187816/27a18a182715/fendo-16-1538337-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/125c/12187816/27a18a182715/fendo-16-1538337-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/125c/12187816/27a18a182715/fendo-16-1538337-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical and radiographical analysis of percutaneous kyphoplasty with multi-point cement anchoring technique for preventing bone cement displacement in Kümmell's disease of stage I and II.采用多点骨水泥锚固技术的经皮椎体后凸成形术预防Ⅰ、Ⅱ期Kümmell病骨水泥移位的临床及影像学分析
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 11;16:1538337. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1538337. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of near- and midterm outcomes of two unilateral percutaneous translaminar vertebral kyphoplasty procedures for the treatment of single-segment OVCF: a single-center randomized controlled study.两种单侧经皮椎板间椎体后凸成形术治疗单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的近期和中期疗效比较:一项单中心随机对照研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Apr 1;35(1):142. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04241-4.
3
Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)患者的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3439-3449. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
4
Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.单侧与双侧经皮球囊椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折:重叠荟萃分析的系统评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(33):e11968. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011968.
5
Risk factors of vertebral re-fracture after PVP or PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, especially in Eastern Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮椎体后凸成形术(PVP)或经皮椎体成形术(PKP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后椎体再骨折的风险因素,特别是在东亚:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03038-z.
6
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty vs. kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic Kümmell's disease:a prospective cohort study.经皮椎体成形术与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性 Kümmell 病的临床疗效比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 13;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03271-9.
7
Vertebral augmentation plus short-segment fixation versus vertebral augmentation alone in Kümmell's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Kümmell 病行椎体增强加短节段固定与单纯椎体增强的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr;45(2):1009-1018. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01661-8. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
8
Can Unilateral Kyphoplasty Replace Bilateral Kyphoplasty in Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单侧椎体后凸成形术能否替代双侧椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折?一项系统评价与Meta分析
Pain Physician. 2016 Nov-Dec;19(8):551-563.
9
Percutaneous mesh-container-plasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of Kümmell's disease: a retrospective cohort study.经皮网袋成型术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗 Kümmell 病的回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 30;18(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03753-1.
10
Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty for the treatment of neurologically intact osteoporotic Kümmell's disease.经皮椎体成形术与后凸成形术治疗神经功能正常的骨质疏松性 Kümmell 病。
BMC Surg. 2021 Jan 29;21(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01057-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of thoracolumbar fascia injury on reported outcomes after percutaneous vertebroplasty.胸腰筋膜损伤对经皮椎体成形术后报告结果的影响。
Front Surg. 2024 May 16;11:1379769. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1379769. eCollection 2024.
2
Prevention of Bone Cement Displacement in Kümmell Disease without Neurological Deficits through Treatment with a Novel Hollow Pedicle Screw Combined with Kyphoplasty.通过新型空心椎弓根螺钉联合椎体后凸成形术治疗无神经功能缺损的Kümmell病预防骨水泥移位
Orthop Surg. 2023 Oct;15(10):2515-2522. doi: 10.1111/os.13815. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
Kummell's Disease is Becoming Increasingly Important in an Aging Society: A Review.
库姆尔病在老龄化社会中日益重要:综述
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2023 Mar 22;19(1):32-41. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e13. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Symptomatic Bone Cement Displacement following Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Single Center Study.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后症状性骨水泥移位的发生率、危险因素及结局:一项单中心研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 19;11(24):7530. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247530.
5
Predictive Factors for Bone Cement Displacement following Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation in Kümmell's Disease.经皮椎体强化术治疗Kümmell病后骨水泥移位的预测因素
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 16;11(24):7479. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247479.
6
Analysis of strategy and efficacy clinical treatments of Kümmell disease: a cohort study.Kummell病临床治疗策略与疗效分析:一项队列研究
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):974. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3801.
7
Does the Relationship Between Bone Cement and the Intravertebral Cleft of Kummell Disease Affect the Efficacy of PKP?骨水泥与许莫氏病椎体内裂隙的关系是否影响 PKP 的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2022 Apr;160:e430-e435. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.050. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
8
Comparison of Intravertebral Clefts between Kümmell Disease and Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Radiological Study.Kümmell 病与急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折椎体内裂隙的比较:一项影像学研究。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):1979-1986. doi: 10.1111/os.13025. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Using a Rotary Cutter for Treating Kümmell's Disease with Intravertebral Vacuum Cleft.使用旋转切割器经皮椎体成形术治疗伴有椎体内真空裂隙的Kümmell病
Pain Physician. 2021 Jul;24(4):E477-E482.
10
Is Kummell's Disease a Misdiagnosed and/or an Underreported Complication of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures? A Pattern of the Condition and Available Treatment Modalities.Kummell病是骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的误诊和/或报告不足的并发症吗?病情模式及可用治疗方式
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 11;10(12):2584. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122584.