Suppr超能文献

双孔内镜与管状入路治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Comparison of the Biportal Endoscopic Versus Tubular Approach for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Kurapatti Mark, Yu Alexander, Ahmed Hamza, Jain Charu, Hoang Ryan, Ricca Gray W, Song Junho, Berman Daniel, Lee Joshua, Cho Samuel K

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, CA, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 26:21925682251356220. doi: 10.1177/21925682251356220.

Abstract

Study DesignSystematic Review and Meta-analysis.ObjectivesLumbar degenerative disease (LDD) is prevalent among aging adults. While tubular retraction is a widely used minimally invasive approach, biportal endoscopic spine surgery has emerged as a potential alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of tubular retraction and biportal endoscopy for decompression procedures (discectomy, laminectomy, laminotomy) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in LDD patients.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified relevant studies published before October 7, 2024. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model to assess Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, complication rates, operative time, and length of stay at preoperative, ≤2-weeks postoperative, and ≥1-year postoperative time points.ResultsA total of 772 patients were included (400 tubular, 372 biportal). Biportal endoscopic surgery was associated with a lower complication rate (10.73% vs 15.94%; < .001) and lower ≤2-week postoperative VAS back pain (2.70 ± 0.27 vs 3.55 ± 0.49; < .001) relative to tubular spine surgery. Biportal decompression had a lower complication rate (15.13% vs 22.34%; = .006) but similar patient-reported outcomes. Biportal TLIF had longer operative times (189.93 ± 25.90 vs 145.1 ± 14.90 min; = .026) but lower complication rates (6.33% vs 9.55%; = .026) and ≥1-year VAS leg pain (1.88 ± 0.29 vs 2.02 ± 0.26; < .001).ConclusionsBiportal endoscopy for LDD had lower complication rates and similar patient-reported outcomes relative to tubular retraction, though longer operative times in TLIF subanalysis. Future studies are necessary to validate findings and guide patient-specific decision-making.

摘要

研究设计

系统评价与荟萃分析。

目的

腰椎退行性疾病(LDD)在老年人中很常见。虽然管状牵开术是一种广泛应用的微创手术方法,但双孔道内镜脊柱手术已成为一种潜在的替代方法。本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了管状牵开术和双孔道内镜手术在LDD患者减压手术(椎间盘切除术、椎板切除术、椎板切开术)和经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)中的临床结果。

方法

根据PRISMA指南进行比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。对PubMed、Embase和Scopus进行全面检索,以确定2024年10月7日前发表的相关研究。使用随机效应模型分析数据,以评估术前、术后≤2周和术后≥1年时间点的Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、并发症发生率、手术时间和住院时间。

结果

共纳入772例患者(400例采用管状牵开术,372例采用双孔道内镜手术)。与管状脊柱手术相比,双孔道内镜手术的并发症发生率较低(10.73%对15.94%;P<0.001),术后≤2周时背部VAS疼痛较低(2.70±0.27对3.55±0.49;P<0.001)。双孔道减压术的并发症发生率较低(15.13%对22.34%;P=0.006),但患者报告的结果相似。双孔道TLIF手术时间较长(189.93±25.90对145.1±14.90分钟;P=0.026),但并发症发生率较低(6.33%对9.55%;P=0.026),术后≥1年时腿部VAS疼痛较低(1.88±0.29对2.02±0.26;P<0.001)。

结论

与管状牵开术相比,LDD的双孔道内镜手术并发症发生率较低,患者报告的结果相似,尽管在TLIF亚分析中手术时间较长。未来有必要进行研究以验证研究结果并指导针对患者的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ea/12202385/edc9684a03b5/10.1177_21925682251356220-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验