Andualem Zemenu Awoke, Meshesha Derege Tsegaye, Hassen Ebrahim Esa
Department of Natural Resource Management, Gambella University, Gambella, Ethiopia.
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Jun;32(27):16395-16412. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36619-6. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
Land management practices have been implemented in various regions of Ethiopia since the 1980s to address land degradation, enhance land productivity, and improve the livelihoods of rural communities. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impacts of watershed management on crop yield potential in the Yezat watershed. Crop yield data were collected from 45 fixed plots using quadrant measurements (5 × 5 m) and from 346 households through a questionnaire survey within the watershed area. One-way ANOVA was employed to assess the mean variances of crop yield and yield attributes across different treatment groups. Additionally, a post hoc analysis was conducted to determine statistically significant differences in crop yields among the various treatments. A paired-samples t-test was also applied to compare teff crop yields before and after watershed management interventions. The findings of the study revealed a statistically significant difference in plant height across physical, bio-physical, and control farmlands (P ≤ 0.05). The tallest teff plants were found in areas with bio-physical watershed management interventions, followed by those with physical treatments, while the shortest plants were observed in untreated areas of the watershed. Similarly, the longest spike length (47.4 cm) was recorded in farmlands with bio-physical treatments, followed by those with physical treatments (44.4 cm). In contrast, the shortest spike length (30.3 cm) was observed in untreated farmlands. This difference is likely due to soil erosion, reduced soil moisture, and high bulk density in the untreated areas. Furthermore, the number of productive tillers in a 25-m2 area (from the upper, middle, and lower watershed), aboveground biomass yield, straw yield, and crop yields were significantly influenced by watershed management interventions (both bio-physical and physical types) (P ≤ 0.05). These improvements are likely linked to soil and water conservation (SWC) techniques, which enhance soil moisture availability by increasing infiltration and preventing the loss of vital soil nutrients through erosion. However, the number of tillers did not show a statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) between treated and untreated areas of the study. Overall, the results suggest that watershed management positively impacts crop yield and yield attributes, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving agricultural productivity.
自20世纪80年代以来,埃塞俄比亚各地区已实施土地管理措施,以应对土地退化、提高土地生产力并改善农村社区的生计。因此,本研究旨在评估叶扎特流域的流域管理对作物产量潜力的影响。作物产量数据通过象限测量法(5×5米)从45个固定地块收集,并通过对流域内346户家庭的问卷调查收集。采用单因素方差分析来评估不同处理组间作物产量和产量属性的平均方差。此外,进行了事后分析以确定不同处理间作物产量的统计学显著差异。还应用配对样本t检验来比较流域管理干预前后的画眉草作物产量。研究结果显示,在物理、生物物理和对照农田中,株高存在统计学显著差异(P≤0.05)。最高的画眉草植株出现在采用生物物理流域管理干预措施的地区,其次是采用物理处理的地区,而在流域未处理地区观察到的植株最矮。同样,生物物理处理的农田记录到最长的穗长(47.4厘米),其次是物理处理的农田(44.4厘米)。相比之下,未处理农田中观察到最短的穗长(30.3厘米)。这种差异可能是由于未处理地区的土壤侵蚀、土壤水分减少和容重较高。此外,流域管理干预措施(生物物理和物理类型)对25平方米区域内(来自流域的上部、中部和下部)的有效分蘖数、地上生物量产量、秸秆产量和作物产量有显著影响(P≤0.05)。这些改善可能与水土保持(SWC)技术有关,该技术通过增加入渗和防止重要土壤养分因侵蚀而流失来提高土壤水分有效性。然而,研究中处理区和未处理区的分蘖数没有显示出统计学显著差异(P≤0.05)。总体而言,结果表明流域管理对作物产量和产量属性有积极影响,证明了其在提高农业生产力方面的有效性。