Samol Jens, Ng David, Poh Jonathan, Tan Min-Han, Dawar Richa, Carney Jennifer, Orsini James, Scilla Katherine, Tan Yew Oo, Chin Tan Min, Toh Chee Keong, Goh Boon Cher, Lopes Gilberto
Medical Oncology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jun;9:e2500181. doi: 10.1200/PO-25-00181. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
To evaluate the performance of a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) liquid biopsy, LiquidHALLMARK (LHM), compared with tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) and Guardant360 CDx (G360 ctDNA) liquid biopsy for biomarker detection in metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.
This multicenter, prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04703153) enrolled patients across the United States and Singapore. Patients were tested with tissue NGS, LHM, and G360 ctDNA. The primary objective was noninferiority of LHM ctDNA to tissue NGS and G360 ctDNA. Secondary analyses included turnaround time (TAT), overall response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS), with exploratory analysis of the clinical utility of ctRNA.
LHM ctDNA (48.2%) detected 11.4% fewer biomarker-positive patients than tissue NGS (59.6%) and did not meet noninferiority criteria. Compared with tissue NGS, LHM ctDNA and G360 ctDNA were concordant in 72.1% and 66.1% of patients, establishing noninferiority of LHM ctDNA to G360 ctDNA ( = .002). TAT was shorter for LHM ctDNA than for tissue NGS (mean 9.7 21.7 days; < .001). ORR/PFS was similar in patients receiving targeted therapy based on all three assays. Addition of ctRNA increased the diagnostic yield of tissue NGS-confirmed gene rearrangements by 28.6% relative to LHM ctDNA and all actionable biomarkers by 15.6% relative to G360 ctDNA. LHM ctDNA and ctRNA (51/68) detected 8.8% more biomarker-positive patients than G360 ctDNA (45/68), demonstrating superiority of LHM ctDNA and ctRNA ( = .001).
LHM ctDNA is noninferior to G360 ctDNA, but not tissue NGS. Treatment outcomes based on liquid biopsy are comparable with those based on tissue NGS. Incorporation of ctRNA into LHM ctDNA improves the diagnostic yield of actionable, tissue NGS-confirmed gene rearrangements.
评估循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)和循环肿瘤RNA(ctRNA)液体活检技术LiquidHALLMARK(LHM),与组织下一代测序(NGS)和Guardant360 CDx(G360 ctDNA)液体活检技术在转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌生物标志物检测中的性能。
这项多中心前瞻性研究(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04703153)在美国和新加坡招募患者。患者接受了组织NGS、LHM和G360 ctDNA检测。主要目标是LHM ctDNA相对于组织NGS和G360 ctDNA的非劣效性。次要分析包括周转时间(TAT)、总缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS),并对ctRNA的临床效用进行探索性分析。
LHM ctDNA(48.2%)检测到的生物标志物阳性患者比组织NGS(59.6%)少11.4%,未达到非劣效性标准。与组织NGS相比,LHM ctDNA和G360 ctDNA在72.1%和66.1%的患者中结果一致,证实LHM ctDNA相对于G360 ctDNA具有非劣效性(P = 0.002)。LHM ctDNA的TAT比组织NGS短(平均9.7对21.7天;P < 0.001)。在接受基于所有三种检测的靶向治疗的患者中,ORR/PFS相似。添加ctRNA使组织NGS确认的基因重排的诊断率相对于LHM ctDNA提高了28.6%,使所有可操作生物标志物的诊断率相对于G360 ctDNA提高了15.6%。LHM ctDNA和ctRNA(51/68)检测到的生物标志物阳性患者比G360 ctDNA(45/68)多8.8%,表明LHM ctDNA和ctRNA具有优越性(P = 0.001)。
LHM ctDNA不劣于G360 ctDNA,但不如组织NGS。基于液体活检的治疗结果与基于组织NGS的结果相当。将ctRNA纳入LHM ctDNA可提高可操作的、组织NGS确认的基因重排的诊断率。