Pratama Iman Surya, Nurcahyo Wisnu, Istyastono Enade Perdana, Hertiani Triana
Doctoral Study Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Mataram, Mataram 83126, Indonesia.
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Vet Parasitol. 2025 Aug;338:110522. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110522. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
Paramphistomiasis, a neglected infectious disease affecting ruminants, leads to significant productivity losses. The limitations of current antitrematodal agents and emerging anthelmintic resistance highlight the need for alternative treatments, including those derived from medicinal plants. Pharmacological screening plays a crucial role in the discovery and development of natural products for antiparamphistomiasis. This scoping review summarises the methodological aspects used in pharmacological screening studies of medicinal plants for antiparamphistomiasis. Eligible studies included original research articles involving in vitro, in vivo, and in silico methodologies, published in English without year restrictions. Studies focusing on diagnostics, epidemiology, synthetic agents, or feed supplementation were excluded. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus using the keywords Paramphistomum, pharmacological screening, and medicinal plant research. The search, carried out between 11 December 2023 and 31 December 2024, identified 45 articles. Data were extracted using standardised tables covering the test compound, methodological aspects (study design, assay techniques, reporting standards), and study outcomes. A framework analysis categorised methodological element into inputs, processes, and outputs. The findings revealed that the test compounds included plant extracts, fractions, isolates, herbal preparations, and nanoparticles. Common screening methods included the Adult Motility Assay (AMA), Faecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT), and molecular docking. However, considerable heterogeneity in study design, implementation, and reporting contributed to bias, particularly within in vivo studies. The review highlights the need for more integrated and standardised research frameworks to advance natural products as alternative therapies for antiparamphistomiasis.
双腔吸虫病是一种影响反刍动物的被忽视的传染病,会导致巨大的生产力损失。当前抗吸虫药物的局限性以及新出现的驱虫抗性凸显了对替代治疗方法的需求,包括源自药用植物的治疗方法。药理筛选在抗双腔吸虫病天然产物的发现和开发中起着关键作用。本综述总结了药用植物抗双腔吸虫病药理筛选研究中所使用的方法学方面。符合条件的研究包括涉及体外、体内和计算机模拟方法的原创研究文章,不限年份以英文发表。专注于诊断、流行病学、合成药物或饲料补充的研究被排除。使用关键词“双腔吸虫属”、“药理筛选”和“药用植物研究”在PubMed和Scopus中进行了系统的文献检索。在2023年12月11日至2024年12月31日期间进行的检索共识别出45篇文章。使用涵盖测试化合物、方法学方面(研究设计、测定技术、报告标准)和研究结果的标准化表格提取数据。框架分析将方法学要素分为输入、过程和输出。研究结果显示,测试化合物包括植物提取物、馏分、分离物、草药制剂和纳米颗粒。常见的筛选方法包括成虫活力测定(AMA)、粪便虫卵计数减少试验(FECRT)和分子对接。然而,研究设计、实施和报告方面存在相当大的异质性导致了偏差,尤其是在体内研究中。该综述强调需要更综合和标准化的研究框架,以推动将天然产物作为抗双腔吸虫病的替代疗法。