Suppr超能文献

Effect of sperm swim - up vs density gradient centrifugation on embryo aneuploidy detected by non-invasive chromosomal screening in conventional IVF.

作者信息

Fu Yanghua, Huang Jianying, Wu Jie, Qiu Lin, Ou Wen, Ai Ximeng, Zhao Junzhao, Xi Haitao

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Obstetrics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Aug;312:114545. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114545. Epub 2025 Jun 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the aneuploidy rates of blastocysts obtained via conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) using sperm prepared by the swim-up (SU) and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) methods, as detected by non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS). This comparison would provide more evidence for selecting the appropriate semen processing technique for patients undergoing conventional IVF with NICS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent conventional IVF and NICS at our hospital from January 2022 to May 2024.Patients were grouped by semen - processing method (SU and DGC groups). Semen parameters before and after processing on oocyte - retrieval day, oocyte numbers (retrieved, MII), and 2PN embryos were compared. Fertilization, cleavage, D3 high - quality embryo, embryo ploidy, and aneuploidy rates between the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in multiple indicators such as the number of retrieved oocytes between the two groups (P > 0.05); the rate of high-quality embryos on Day 3 in the DGC group was significantly higher than that in the SU group (53.9 % vs. 48.20 %, P = 0.011).The proportion of embryos with Grade A in the DGC group was 31.8 % (262/824), while that in the SU group was 39.4 % (119/302), showing a statistical difference (P = 0.017). The euploidy rate in the DGC group was 21.7 % (179/824) and the aneuploidy rate was 71.2 % (587/824), while the euploidy rate in the SU group was 25.8 % (78/302) and the aneuploidy rate was 68.9 % (208/302). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The SU method yielded a higher proportion of Grade A embryos but did not reduce aneuploidy rates, suggesting its potential as a simpler, cost-effective alternative to DGC for NICS in conventional IVF.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验