Potthoff Karin, Marschner Norbert, Müller Lothar, Sahm Stephan, Lerchenmüller Christian, Depenbusch Reinhard, Boller Emil, Niemeier Beate, Zirrgiebel Ute, Tesch Hans
iOMEDICO, Freiburg i.Br., Germany.
Onkologie Unter Ems, Leer, Germany.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jun 27;56(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01260-6.
The combination of FOLFOX/FOLFIRI with an EGFR-antibody (cetuximab/panitumumab) is a first-line standard for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The OPTIMOX stop-and-go regimen, which reduces oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, and fluorouracil/folinic acid (FU/FA) were standard maintenance-therapies in the pre-antibody era. Whether an EGFR-antibody adds value to the OPTIMOX strategy in the RAS wild-type setting remains unknown.
In the open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II ERBIMOX trial, patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC received either first-line induction-therapy with 8 cycles of mFOLFOX7 followed by maintenance-therapy with FU/FA (OPTIMOX arm) or mFOLFOX7 + cetuximab followed by FU/FA + cetuximab (ERBIMOX arm). Primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of additional cetuximab to mFOLFOX7 during induction/maintenance-therapy. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The trial is registered at EudraCT (No.2006-002744-28).
From 2006-2011, 138 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC from 23 German sites were randomly assigned to either OPTIMOX (N = 63) or ERBIMOX (N = 75). ORR numerically favored the ERBIMOX arm (64.0% vs. 54.0%, P = 0.3071). Median PFS (ERBIMOX vs. OPTIMOX) was 9.6 vs. 8.8 months (P = 0.7612), median OS 25.6 vs. 30.9 months (P = 0.5821). Most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were skin reactions (21.9% vs. 2.1%) and gastrointestinal disorders (13.5% vs. 9.5%). No cetuximab-related deaths occurred.
In treatment-naïve KRAS wild-type mCRC, adding cetuximab to mFOLFOX7 resulted in numerically higher ORR than mFOLFOX alone, but no statistically significant differences in ORR, PFS or OS; probably because of the premature stop due to poor recruitment. The safety profile was as expected, with few discontinuations.
FOLFOX/FOLFIRI联合表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抗体(西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗)是RAS野生型转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的一线标准治疗方案。在抗体治疗前的时代,可减少奥沙利铂所致神经病变的OPTIMOX停停走走方案以及氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸(FU/FA)是标准的维持治疗方案。在RAS野生型情况下,EGFR抗体是否能为OPTIMOX策略增加价值仍不清楚。
在开放标签、随机、多中心II期ERBIMOX试验中,KRAS野生型mCRC患者接受一线诱导治疗,即8个周期的mFOLFOX7,随后接受FU/FA维持治疗(OPTIMOX组),或mFOLFOX7联合西妥昔单抗,随后接受FU/FA联合西妥昔单抗治疗(ERBIMOX组)。主要目的是证明在诱导/维持治疗期间,额外使用西妥昔单抗相对于mFOLFOX7的优越性。主要终点是客观缓解率(ORR)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。该试验已在欧洲临床试验数据库(EudraCT)注册(编号:2006-002744-28)。
2006年至2011年,来自德国23个中心的138例KRAS野生型mCRC患者被随机分配至OPTIMOX组(N = 63)或ERBIMOX组(N = 75)。ORR在数值上有利于ERBIMOX组(64.0%对54.0%,P = 0.3071)。中位PFS(ERBIMOX组对OPTIMOX组)分别为9.6个月和8.8个月(P = 0.7612),中位OS分别为25.6个月和30.9个月(P = 0.5821)。最常见的3/4级不良事件(AE)是皮肤反应(21.9%对2.1%)和胃肠道疾病(13.5%对9.5%)。未发生与西妥昔单抗相关的死亡。
在未经治疗的KRAS野生型mCRC中,mFOLFOX7联合西妥昔单抗的ORR在数值上高于单纯mFOLFOX7,但在ORR、PFS或OS方面无统计学显著差异;可能是由于入组不佳导致研究提前终止。安全性符合预期,很少有患者停药。