Suppr超能文献

ERBIMOX的最终结果:一项关于改良FOLFOX7联合或不联合西妥昔单抗作为KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌一线治疗的随机II期研究。

Final Results of ERBIMOX: A Randomized Phase II Study of Modified FOLFOX7 With or Without Cetuximab as First-Line Treatment for KRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

作者信息

Potthoff Karin, Marschner Norbert, Müller Lothar, Sahm Stephan, Lerchenmüller Christian, Depenbusch Reinhard, Boller Emil, Niemeier Beate, Zirrgiebel Ute, Tesch Hans

机构信息

iOMEDICO, Freiburg i.Br., Germany.

Onkologie Unter Ems, Leer, Germany.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jun 27;56(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01260-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combination of FOLFOX/FOLFIRI with an EGFR-antibody (cetuximab/panitumumab) is a first-line standard for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The OPTIMOX stop-and-go regimen, which reduces oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, and fluorouracil/folinic acid (FU/FA) were standard maintenance-therapies in the pre-antibody era. Whether an EGFR-antibody adds value to the OPTIMOX strategy in the RAS wild-type setting remains unknown.

METHODS

In the open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II ERBIMOX trial, patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC received either first-line induction-therapy with 8 cycles of mFOLFOX7 followed by maintenance-therapy with FU/FA (OPTIMOX arm) or mFOLFOX7 + cetuximab followed by FU/FA + cetuximab (ERBIMOX arm). Primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of additional cetuximab to mFOLFOX7 during induction/maintenance-therapy. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The trial is registered at EudraCT (No.2006-002744-28).

RESULTS

From 2006-2011, 138 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC from 23 German sites were randomly assigned to either OPTIMOX (N = 63) or ERBIMOX (N = 75). ORR numerically favored the ERBIMOX arm (64.0% vs. 54.0%, P = 0.3071). Median PFS (ERBIMOX vs. OPTIMOX) was 9.6 vs. 8.8 months (P = 0.7612), median OS 25.6 vs. 30.9 months (P = 0.5821). Most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were skin reactions (21.9% vs. 2.1%) and gastrointestinal disorders (13.5% vs. 9.5%). No cetuximab-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

In treatment-naïve KRAS wild-type mCRC, adding cetuximab to mFOLFOX7 resulted in numerically higher ORR than mFOLFOX alone, but no statistically significant differences in ORR, PFS or OS; probably because of the premature stop due to poor recruitment. The safety profile was as expected, with few discontinuations.

摘要

背景

FOLFOX/FOLFIRI联合表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抗体(西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗)是RAS野生型转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的一线标准治疗方案。在抗体治疗前的时代,可减少奥沙利铂所致神经病变的OPTIMOX停停走走方案以及氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸(FU/FA)是标准的维持治疗方案。在RAS野生型情况下,EGFR抗体是否能为OPTIMOX策略增加价值仍不清楚。

方法

在开放标签、随机、多中心II期ERBIMOX试验中,KRAS野生型mCRC患者接受一线诱导治疗,即8个周期的mFOLFOX7,随后接受FU/FA维持治疗(OPTIMOX组),或mFOLFOX7联合西妥昔单抗,随后接受FU/FA联合西妥昔单抗治疗(ERBIMOX组)。主要目的是证明在诱导/维持治疗期间,额外使用西妥昔单抗相对于mFOLFOX7的优越性。主要终点是客观缓解率(ORR)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。该试验已在欧洲临床试验数据库(EudraCT)注册(编号:2006-002744-28)。

结果

2006年至2011年,来自德国23个中心的138例KRAS野生型mCRC患者被随机分配至OPTIMOX组(N = 63)或ERBIMOX组(N = 75)。ORR在数值上有利于ERBIMOX组(64.0%对54.0%,P = 0.3071)。中位PFS(ERBIMOX组对OPTIMOX组)分别为9.6个月和8.8个月(P = 0.7612),中位OS分别为25.6个月和30.9个月(P = 0.5821)。最常见的3/4级不良事件(AE)是皮肤反应(21.9%对2.1%)和胃肠道疾病(13.5%对9.5%)。未发生与西妥昔单抗相关的死亡。

结论

在未经治疗的KRAS野生型mCRC中,mFOLFOX7联合西妥昔单抗的ORR在数值上高于单纯mFOLFOX7,但在ORR、PFS或OS方面无统计学显著差异;可能是由于入组不佳导致研究提前终止。安全性符合预期,很少有患者停药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验