Rico-Romano Cristina, Amar Dina Aslimani, Ducept Valentin, Vilariño-Rodríguez Rosa M, Garrido-Martínez Pablo, Gutierrez-Vargas Vanessa, Mena-Álvarez Jesús
Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, Spain.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 14;18(12):2800. doi: 10.3390/ma18122800.
Cosmetic restorative dentistry focuses on restoring teeth affected by caries or trauma using materials that mimic natural teeth in shape, texture, and color. Composite resins, particularly nanofilled composites, are widely used due to their superior mechanical and aesthetic properties. Accurate tooth color selection is crucial, and methods include visual (shade guides) and instrumental (spectrophotometers, colorimeters, and intraoral scanners). Newer biomimetic composites, such as Admira Fusion 5 and Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal, simplify shade selection through advanced optical technologies. A randomized clinical study involving 30 patients compared the color-matching accuracy of two biomimetic composite resins: Admira Fusion 5 (Voco) and Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal (Kuraray). The study utilized the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer and the Primescan intraoral scanner. Patients were treated following standardized protocols, and shade accuracy was evaluated pre- and post-restoration using Cohen's Kappa index. Admira Fusion 5 showed higher shade-matching accuracy, with good agreement between pre- and post-restoration measurements using both instruments. Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal demonstrated lower reproducibility in shade matching, particularly in posterior teeth, with lower agreement in pre- and post-tests. Instrumentation Comparison: Primescan showed slightly better performance than Easyshade, but both provided comparable results. In conclusions, universal composites may not always achieve optimal shade matching in posterior teeth. Layered composites provide better color adaptability. While digital instruments enhance shade accuracy, combining them with visual methods yields the best clinical outcomes. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to improve shade-matching techniques in aesthetic restorative dentistry.
美容修复牙科专注于使用在形状、质地和颜色上模仿天然牙齿的材料来修复受龋齿或外伤影响的牙齿。复合树脂,尤其是纳米填充复合树脂,因其优异的机械性能和美学性能而被广泛使用。准确的牙齿颜色选择至关重要,方法包括视觉(比色板)和仪器(分光光度计、色度计和口腔内扫描仪)。新型仿生复合树脂,如Admira Fusion 5和Clearfil Majesty ES - 2通用型,通过先进的光学技术简化了颜色选择。一项涉及30名患者的随机临床研究比较了两种仿生复合树脂的颜色匹配准确性:Admira Fusion 5(VOCO公司)和Clearfil Majesty ES - 2通用型(可乐丽公司)。该研究使用了Vita Easyshade分光光度计和Primescan口腔内扫描仪。患者按照标准化方案进行治疗,并使用科恩卡帕指数在修复前和修复后评估颜色准确性。Admira Fusion 5显示出更高的颜色匹配准确性,使用两种仪器在修复前和修复后的测量结果之间具有良好的一致性。Clearfil Majesty ES - 2通用型在颜色匹配方面表现出较低的可重复性,尤其是在后牙,在测试前和测试后的一致性较低。仪器比较:Primescan的性能略优于Easyshade,但两者提供的结果相当。总之,通用型复合树脂在后牙可能并不总是能实现最佳的颜色匹配。分层复合树脂具有更好的颜色适应性。虽然数字仪器提高了颜色准确性,但将它们与视觉方法结合可产生最佳的临床效果。需要进行更大样本量的进一步研究以改善美容修复牙科中的颜色匹配技术。