Lorentzen Eva Ulla, Vollenberg Richard, Neddermeyer Rieke, Schoefbaenker Michael, Hrincius Eike R, Ludwig Stephan, Tepasse Phil-Robin, Kuehn Joachim Ewald
Institute of Virology, University of Muenster, Von-Stauffenberg-Str. 36, D-48151 Muenster, Germany.
Department of Medicine B for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Clinical Infectiology, University Hospital Muenster, D-48149 Muenster, Germany.
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 May 30;13(6):595. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13060595.
Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) undergoing treatment with anti-TNF antibodies mount a diminished humoral immune response to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 compared to healthy controls. The characterization of variant-specific immune responses is particularly warranted among immunosuppressed patients, where reduced responses may necessitate further medical interventions. This pilot study investigated the humoral immune response of vaccinated IBD patients on anti-TNF medication and a comparable group of healthy individuals against the viral variants Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron BA.1 and BA.5. While total IgG antibodies targeting the receptor binding site of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 were quantified using a chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), their potential neutralizing capacity was determined using commercial and variant-specific in-house surrogate virus neutralization tests (sVNTs) against a variant-specific in-house VSV-pseudotyped virus neutralization test (pVNT) as the gold standard. Employing variant-specific assays recapitulated the immune escape functions of virus variants. Conspicuously, antibody reactivity against Alpha and Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 was strikingly poor in IBD patient sera post-initial vaccination compared to healthy individuals. A comparison of the diagnostic performance of assays with the pVNT revealed that identification of patients with inadequate humoral responses by CMIA and sVNT may require adjustments to cut-off values and end-point titration of sera. Following adaptation of cut-off values, patient sera exhibited reduced reactivity against all tested variants. The assay panel used substantiated the impact of anti-TNF therapy in IBD patients as to reduced strength, function, and breadth of the immune response to several SARS-CoV-2 variants. The immune response measured following the second vaccination was comparable to the antibody response observed in healthy individuals following the first vaccination. Variant-specific sVNTs and pVNTs have the potential to serve as valuable tools for evaluating the efficacy of adapted vaccines and to inform clinical interventions in the care of immunosuppressed patients. Anti-TNF-treated individuals with antibody levels below the optimized CMIA threshold should be considered for early booster vaccination and/or close immunological monitoring.
与健康对照相比,接受抗TNF抗体治疗的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者对SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种的体液免疫反应减弱。在免疫抑制患者中,特别需要对变异株特异性免疫反应进行表征,因为反应降低可能需要进一步的医疗干预。这项初步研究调查了接受抗TNF药物治疗的IBD疫苗接种患者以及一组可比的健康个体针对病毒变异株Alpha、Beta、Gamma、Delta以及Omicron BA.1和BA.5的体液免疫反应。使用化学发光微粒免疫分析(CMIA)对靶向SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白受体结合位点的总IgG抗体进行定量,同时使用商业和变异株特异性的内部替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)以及作为金标准的针对变异株特异性的内部VSV假型病毒中和试验(pVNT)来确定其潜在中和能力。采用变异株特异性分析方法概括了病毒变异株的免疫逃逸功能。值得注意的是,与健康个体相比,IBD患者血清在初次接种疫苗后针对Alpha以及Omicron BA.1和BA.5的抗体反应明显较差。将这些分析方法与pVNT的诊断性能进行比较发现,通过CMIA和sVNT识别体液反应不足的患者可能需要调整血清的临界值和终点滴定。调整临界值后,患者血清对所有测试变异株的反应性降低。所使用的分析方法证实了抗TNF治疗对IBD患者免疫反应强度、功能和广度的影响,使其对几种SARS-CoV-2变异株的免疫反应降低。第二次接种疫苗后测得的免疫反应与健康个体第一次接种疫苗后观察到的抗体反应相当。变异株特异性的sVNT和pVNT有潜力作为评估改良疫苗疗效的有价值工具,并为免疫抑制患者的临床护理干预提供依据。对于抗体水平低于优化后的CMIA阈值的抗TNF治疗个体,应考虑早期加强接种疫苗和/或密切免疫监测。