Kidwai Amna Afrin, Yadav Komal, Tewari Nitesh, Sultan Farheen, Mathur Vijay Prakash, Upadhyaya Ashish Dutt, Rahul Morankar
Division of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Centre for Dental Education and Research, all India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Dent Traumatol. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1111/edt.13084.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Re-bonding of a fractured fragment without any preparations or reinforcement has been recommended as the preferred treatment of uncomplicated crown fractures. A recent systematic review found that post-bonding reinforcements could reduce the risk of loss of attached fragments in teeth with uncomplicated and complicated crown fractures. Hence, this study aimed to compare various techniques of reinforcement in terms of the force required to fracture, using bovine incisor models with simulated uncomplicated crown fractures.
This in vitro study was initiated after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. The sample size was calculated as 20 teeth per group, and bovine mandibular incisors were carefully evaluated for size and absence of structural defects and randomly allocated to four groups (Group I- Simple Reattachment, Group II- External Chamfer, Group III- Over contouring, Group IV- Sound teeth). Those in experimental groups were subjected to a fracture protocol, kept dry at room temperature and atmospheric pressure for 24 h, rehydrated for 15 min, and bonded using simple reattachment. The post-bonding reinforcement protocols were followed for Groups II and III. Samples were stored in normal saline, and thermocycling was performed. A universal testing machine was used to assess the force required to fracture.
The least magnitude of force required for fracture was seen in Group I, while the highest was seen in Group III (164.75 N). The force in Group I was significantly lower compared to all the protocols of post-bonding reinforcement and the control teeth (Group IV). A statistically significant difference was not seen between Groups II and III.
The force required to fracture the teeth subjected to post-bonding reinforcement was significantly more than that seen after simple reattachment. The maximum force was exhibited by the teeth reinforced by over-contouring, followed by an external chamfer.
背景/目的:对于无并发症的冠折,推荐在不做任何预备或增强处理的情况下重新粘结折断碎片作为首选治疗方法。最近一项系统评价发现,粘结后增强处理可降低无并发症和有并发症冠折牙齿附着碎片丧失的风险。因此,本研究旨在使用模拟无并发症冠折的牛切牙模型,比较不同增强技术在折断所需力量方面的差异。
本体外研究在获得机构伦理委员会批准后启动。每组样本量计算为20颗牙齿,仔细评估牛下颌切牙的大小和有无结构缺陷,并随机分为四组(I组-简单重新附着,II组-外斜面,III组-过度塑形,IV组-完好牙齿)。实验组的牙齿按照折断方案处理,在室温及大气压下干燥24小时,再水化15分钟,然后使用简单重新附着方法进行粘结。II组和III组遵循粘结后增强方案。样本储存在生理盐水中,并进行热循环处理。使用万能试验机评估折断所需的力量。
I组折断所需力量最小,而III组最大(164.75N)。I组的力量与所有粘结后增强方案及对照牙齿(IV组)相比显著更低。II组和III组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
粘结后增强处理的牙齿折断所需力量明显大于简单重新附着后的力量。过度塑形增强的牙齿表现出最大力量,其次是外斜面增强的牙齿。