Cai Wenlan, Shen Fangming, Zhu Lanyue, Xue Yuqing, Sun Menghan, Tan Xiaoxiang, Shi Kaikai, Chen Yuzhou, Sun Jie
From the Department of Anesthesiology & Key Laboratory of Clinical Science and Research, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China (WC, FS, LZ, YX, MS, XT, KS, YC, JS).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002226.
Remimazolam tosylate, a novel short-acting benzodiazepine, is increasingly being used in general anaesthesia, but its role in the incidence of postoperative delirium is uncertain, particularly in frail elderly patients.
To compare the effects of remimazolam tosylate with propofol on the incidence of postoperative delirium in frail elderly patients undergoing hip surgery.
Randomised, single-centre, single-blind controlled trial.
A tertiary teaching hospital in China, conducted from March to December 2023.
Frail elderly patients (Reported Edmonton Frail Scale Score ≥ 6) undergoing hip surgery under general anaesthesia.
Patients were randomly assigned to either the propofol or remimazolam group. Both groups received total intravenous anaesthesia following a standardised protocol with either propofol or remimazolam tosylate for induction and maintenance.
The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative delirium within three postoperative days, assessed twice daily using the 3D Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM). The secondary outcomes included the quality of postoperative recovery and adverse events.
A total of 136 patients were enrolled. The incidence of postoperative delirium was significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group [3 of 68 (4.4%) vs. 12 of 68 (17.6%), risk differece (RD) -13.2%, 95% CI -23.5% to -2.9%, relative risk (RR) 0.25, 95% CI 0.074 to 0.847, NNT 7.6, P = 0.0143]. The incidence of hypotension after induction was also lower in the remimazolam group [16 of 68 (23.5%) vs. 32 of 68 (47.1%), RD -23.5%, 95%CI -39.1% to -8.0%, RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.304 to 0.822, NNT 4.3, P = 0.004], with fewer patients requiring vasopressors [55 of 68 (80.9%) vs. 66 of 68 (97.1%), RD -16.2%, 95% CI -26.3 to -6.0, RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.737 to 0.942, NNT 6.2, P = 0.003]. Notably, the remimazolam group exhibited significantly less burst suppression compared with the propofol group, both in terms of burst suppression time (2.2 s [0 to 17.6] vs. 21.9 s [2.3 to 115.3] median difference = 11.98 s, 95% CI 2.44 to 27.90, P < 0.001) and its proportion relative to the total surgery time (0.3‰ [0 to 2.1] vs. 2.8‰ [0.2 to 14.7], median difference 1.30‰, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.34, P < 0.001).
In frail elderly patients, remimazolam tosylate was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative delirium compared with propofol.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, Chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2300068632.
甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑是一种新型短效苯二氮䓬类药物,越来越多地用于全身麻醉,但它在术后谵妄发生率中的作用尚不确定,尤其是在体弱的老年患者中。
比较甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚对接受髋关节手术的体弱老年患者术后谵妄发生率的影响。
随机、单中心、单盲对照试验。
中国一家三级教学医院,于2023年3月至12月进行。
接受全身麻醉下髋关节手术的体弱老年患者(埃德蒙顿脆弱量表评分≥6)。
患者被随机分配到丙泊酚组或瑞马唑仑组。两组均按照标准化方案接受全静脉麻醉,分别使用丙泊酚或甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑进行诱导和维持。
主要结局是术后三天内术后谵妄的发生率,使用3D意识模糊评估法(3D-CAM)每天评估两次。次要结局包括术后恢复质量和不良事件。
共纳入136例患者。瑞马唑仑组术后谵妄的发生率显著低于丙泊酚组[68例中有3例(4.4%) vs. 68例中有12例(17.6%),风险差异(RD)-13.2%,95%置信区间-23.5%至-2.9%,相对风险(RR)0.25,95%置信区间0.074至0.847,需治疗人数(NNT)7.6,P = 0.0143]。诱导后低血压的发生率在瑞马唑仑组也较低[68例中有16例(23.5%) vs. 68例中有32例(47.1%),RD -23.5%,95%置信区间-39.1%至-8.0%,RR 0.5,95%置信区间0.304至0.822,NNT 4.3,P = 0.004],需要血管升压药的患者较少[68例中有55例(80.9%) vs. 68例中有66例(97.1%),RD -16.2%,95%置信区间-26.3至-6.0,RR 0.8,95%置信区间0.737至0.942,NNT 6.2,P = 0.003]。值得注意的是,瑞马唑仑组与丙泊酚组相比,无论是在爆发抑制时间方面(2.2秒[0至17.6] vs. 21.9秒[2.3至115.3],中位数差异 = 11.98秒,95%置信区间2.44至27.90, P < 0.001)还是其相对于总手术时间的比例方面(0.3‰[0至2.1] vs. 2.8‰[0.2至14.7],中位数差异1.30‰,95%置信区间0.27至3.34,P < 0.001),爆发抑制都明显更少。
在体弱老年患者中,与丙泊酚相比甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与较低的术后谵妄发生率相关。
中国临床试验注册中心,Chictr.org.cn,标识符:ChiCTR2300068632