Xue Miao, Wu Yanqin, Tang Yiyang, Huang Kun, Liu Haikuan, Zhu Bowen, Wen Jie, Zhao Yue, Zhang Guixiong, Liu Hang, Fan Wenzhe, Li Jiaping
The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 12;16:1560750. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1560750. eCollection 2025.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with lenvatinib and a PD-1 inhibitor (TACE+LEN+PD-1) compared to TACE combined with lenvatinib alone (TACE+LEN) in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients exceeding the up-to-7 criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 115 patients with intermediate-stage HCC exceeding the up-to-7 criteria, treated between January 2015 and December 2023, were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Key clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response rates based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and adverse events (AEs), were evaluated and compared between the two treatment groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors affecting OS and PFS. RESULTS: Among the patients, 35 received TACE+LEN+PD-1, and 80 underwent TACE+LEN. The TACE+LEN+PD-1 group achieved a longer median PFS (10.0 months vs. 5.7 months; =0.002) and a median OS of 21.0 months, compared to 16.2 months in the TACE+LEN group, though the OS difference was not statistically significant (=0.096). Progression to macrovascular invasion (MVI) or extrahepatic spread (EHS) was delayed in the TACE+LEN+PD-1 group compared to the TACE+LEN group (12.0 months vs. 7.5 months; =0.007). Multivariate analysis identified treatment modality and tumor burden score (TBS) as independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Subgroup analyses showed that patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or HBV positivity derived greater benefits from TACE+LEN+PD-1, while those with high TBS or a Child-Pugh score of 7 did not show similar advantages. The rates and severity of AEs were comparable between groups (any grade: 88.6% vs. 91.3%, =0.733; grade 3 or 4: 48.6% vs. 42.5%, =0.546). CONCLUSION: TACE+LEN+PD-1 significantly improved PFS, particularly by delaying progression to MVI or EHS after the first TACE session in intermediate-stage HCC patients exceeding the up-to-7 criteria, compared to TACE+LEN. Subgroup analysis indicated superior survival benefits for patients with a PS of 0 or HBV positivity, but not in those with high TBS or a Child-Pugh score of 7. The safety profile of TACE+LEN+PD-1 was comparable to TACE+LEN. However, the OS benefit between the two groups was not statistically significant.
目的:本研究旨在评估与单独使用乐伐替尼联合经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)(TACE+LEN)相比,在超过 up-to-7 标准的中期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中,TACE 联合乐伐替尼及 PD-1 抑制剂(TACE+LEN+PD-1)的疗效和安全性。 材料与方法:前瞻性收集并回顾性分析 2015 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间治疗的 115 例超过 up-to-7 标准的中期 HCC 患者的数据。评估并比较两个治疗组的关键临床结局,包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、基于实体瘤改良疗效评价标准(mRECIST)的肿瘤缓解率以及不良事件(AE)。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定影响 OS 和 PFS 的因素。 结果:患者中,35 例接受 TACE+LEN+PD-1,80 例接受 TACE+LEN。TACE+LEN+PD-1 组的中位 PFS 更长(10.0 个月对 5.7 个月;P=0.002),中位 OS 为 21.0 个月,而 TACE+LEN 组为 16.2 个月,尽管 OS 差异无统计学意义(P=0.096)。与 TACE+LEN 组相比,TACE+LEN+PD-1 组进展为大血管侵犯(MVI)或肝外转移(EHS)的时间延迟(12.0 个月对 7.5 个月;P=0.007)。多因素分析确定治疗方式和肿瘤负荷评分(TBS)为 OS 和 PFS 的独立预后因素。亚组分析显示,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态(PS)为 0 或乙肝病毒(HBV)阳性的患者从 TACE+LEN+PD-1 中获益更大,而 TBS 高或 Child-Pugh 评分为 7 的患者未显示出类似优势。两组 AE 的发生率和严重程度相当(任何级别:88.6%对 91.3%,P=0.733;3 级或 4 级:48.6%对 42.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-10
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024-4-23
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023-9-12