Raymond Tia T, Guerguerian Anne Marie, Lasa Javier J, Moga Michael Alice, Dhillon Gurpreet S, Acworth Jason, Atkins Dianne L, Scholefield Barnaby R
Department of Paediatrics, Cardiac Critical Care, Medical City Children's Hospital, 7777 Forest Ln, Dallas, TX 75230, USA.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Resusc Plus. 2025 Jun 3;25:100997. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100997. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Assess the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), compared with manual/mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in pediatric patients with single ventricle (SV) congenital heart disease (CHD).
PRISMA guidelines were followed with PROSPERO registration (CRD42023479671). We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for studies published before January 23, 2025. The population included pediatric patients (<18 years old) with IHCA. Two investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Outcomes included short-term and long-term survival and favorable neurological outcome.
We identified 20 studies: 15 described ECPR in SV patients without a comparator group, and 5 compared SV ECPR patients vs. SV extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) without ECPR (ECMO non-ECPR). Pooled synthesis for survival to hospital discharge was analyzed in 3 observational studies with 91 SV patients (pooled OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.37-1.01) and separately in 2 registry studies with 968 SV patients (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35-1.37 and OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.41) with very low certainty of evidence (downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision). These studies found no significant difference in survival to hospital discharge in ECPR compared to ECMO non-ECPR in pediatric SV patients. No studies were identified that compared pediatric SV patients who received ECPR vs. conventional/manual CPR.
There is no direct evidence to either support or refute the use of ECPR during IHCA in pediatric patients with SV CHD, and there is inconclusive evidence to either support or refute the use of ECPR compared to ECMO non-ECPR. Additional research is needed to address the use of ECPR in this specific cardiac population.
评估体外心肺复苏(ECPR)与手动/机械心肺复苏(CPR)相比,在单心室(SV)先天性心脏病(CHD)小儿患者院内心脏骤停(IHCA)中的应用情况。
遵循PRISMA指南并进行PROSPERO注册(CRD42023479671)。我们检索了Medline、Embase、Web of Science、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆,以查找2025年1月23日前发表的研究。研究对象包括患有IHCA的小儿患者(<18岁)。两名研究人员对研究的相关性进行审查,提取数据,并使用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。使用GRADE框架评估证据的确定性。结局包括短期和长期生存以及良好的神经学转归。
我们确定了20项研究:15项描述了SV患者的ECPR,但没有比较组,5项比较了SV ECPR患者与未进行ECPR的体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)(非ECPR的ECMO)患者。在3项观察性研究中的91例SV患者中分析了出院存活的合并综合数据(合并比值比0.66,95%可信区间0.37-1.01),并在2项登记研究中的968例SV患者中分别进行了分析(比值比0.76,95%可信区间0.35-1.37和比值比1.06,95%可信区间0.78-1.41),证据确定性极低(因偏倚风险和不精确性而降级)。这些研究发现,小儿SV患者中,与非ECPR的ECMO相比,ECPR出院存活率无显著差异。未发现有研究比较接受ECPR的小儿SV患者与传统/手动CPR患者。
没有直接证据支持或反驳在患有SV CHD的小儿患者IHCA期间使用ECPR,与非ECPR的ECMO相比,也没有确凿证据支持或反驳使用ECPR。需要进一步的研究来探讨在这一特定心脏疾病人群中ECPR的应用。