Mehta Dvija
King's College, University of Cambridge; Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, University of Cambridge, 16 Mill Ln, Cambridge CB2 1SB, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Oxf Open Neurosci. 2025 Jun 11;4:kvaf002. doi: 10.1093/oons/kvaf002. eCollection 2025.
This paper approaches the role of intentional action in brain-computer interface (BCI) tool use to allow for an ethical discourse regarding the development and usage of neurotechnology. The exploration of mental actions and user control in BCI tool use brings us closer to understanding the philosophical underpinnings of intentions and agency for BCI-mediated actions. The author presents that under some theories of intentional action, certain BCI-mediated overt movements qualify as both voluntary and unintentional. This plausibly magnifies the ethical considerations surrounding BCI tool use. This problem is referred by the author as the contemplation conundrum. Thus, the paper proposes research scope for the neural correlates of intention formation and the neural correlates of imagination aimed at clarifying implementational control and safeguarding privacy of thought in BCI tool use.
本文探讨了有意动作在脑机接口(BCI)工具使用中的作用,以便就神经技术的开发和使用进行伦理讨论。对BCI工具使用中的心理动作和用户控制的探索,使我们更接近于理解BCI介导动作的意图和能动性的哲学基础。作者提出,在某些有意动作理论下,某些BCI介导的明显动作既符合自愿性又符合非自愿性。这可能会放大围绕BCI工具使用的伦理考量。作者将这个问题称为思考难题。因此,本文提出了针对意图形成的神经关联和想象的神经关联的研究范围,旨在阐明BCI工具使用中的实施控制并保护思想隐私。