Burns G Leonard, Becker Stephen P, Montaño Juan José, Sáez Belén, Servera Mateu
Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J Atten Disord. 2025 Sep;29(11):963-976. doi: 10.1177/10870547251344719. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
The objective was to determine the differential validity of a cognitive disengagement syndrome-only (CDS-only) group from ADHD-inattentive presentation-only (IN-only), ADHD-hyperactive-impulsive presentation-only (HI-only), and ADHD-combined presentation (C-only) groups within childhood (ages 5-10) and adolescence (ages 11-16).
Parents of a nationally representative sample of 5,525 Spanish youth (ages 5-16, 56.1% boys) completed measures of CDS, ADHD-inattention (IN), and ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI) and other measures. Scores greater/less than the top 5% on CDS, IN, and HI were used to create: (1) control, (2) CDS-only, (3) ADHD-IN-only, (4) ADHD-HI-only, (5) ADHD-C-only, (6) CDS + ADHD-IN, (7) CDS + ADHD-HI, and (8) CDS + ADHD-C groups within childhood and adolescence.
Within childhood, the CDS-only group had higher scores than the three ADHD presentations on anxiety, depression, somatization, daytime sleep-related impairment, nighttime sleep disturbance, social impairment, and peer withdrawal, whereas CDS-only, ADHD-IN-only, and ADHD-HI-only groups did not differ on oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and academic impairment (ADHD-C-only higher). Within adolescence, the CDS-only group again had higher scores than the three ADHD presentations on somatization and daytime sleep-related impairment but was now lower than the three ADHD presentations on ODD as well as lower on academic impairment than the ADHD-IN-only and ADHD-C-only groups. Within adolescence, the CDS-only group and the three ADHD presentations did not differ on depression, social impairment, or peer withdrawal.
The CDS-only group had strong differential validity from ADHD-IN-only, ADHD-HI-only, and ADHD-C-only groups within childhood with less striking differences in adolescence. In addition to more studies with adolescents, etiological models with multi-informant longitudinal data are needed to better understand the differences in CDS and ADHD dimensions and their changes across development.
确定仅患有认知脱离综合征(仅CDS)组与仅患有注意力不集中型多动症(仅IN)、仅患有多动冲动型多动症(仅HI)以及混合型多动症(仅C)组在儿童期(5至10岁)和青少年期(11至16岁)的差异效度。
对5525名西班牙青少年(5至16岁,56.1%为男孩)进行全国代表性抽样,其父母完成了CDS、注意力不集中型多动症(IN)、多动/冲动型多动症(HI)及其他测量。CDS、IN和HI得分高于/低于前5%的数据用于划分:(1)对照组,(2)仅CDS组,(3)仅ADHD-IN组,(4)仅ADHD-HI组,(5)仅ADHD-C组,(6)CDS + ADHD-IN组,(7)CDS + ADHD-HI组,以及(8)儿童期和青少年期的CDS + ADHD-C组。
在儿童期,仅CDS组在焦虑、抑郁、躯体化、日间睡眠相关损害、夜间睡眠障碍、社交损害和同伴退缩方面的得分高于三种多动症表现类型,而仅CDS组、仅ADHD-IN组和仅ADHD-HI组在对立违抗障碍(ODD)和学业损害方面无差异(仅ADHD-C组更高)。在青少年期,仅CDS组在躯体化和日间睡眠相关损害方面的得分再次高于三种多动症表现类型,但在ODD方面低于三种多动症表现类型,在学业损害方面低于仅ADHD-IN组和仅ADHD-C组。在青少年期,仅CDS组与三种多动症表现类型在抑郁、社交损害或同伴退缩方面无差异。
仅CDS组在儿童期与仅ADHD-IN组、仅ADHD-HI组和仅ADHD-C组有显著的差异效度,在青少年期差异不那么明显。除了对青少年进行更多研究外,还需要多 informant纵向数据的病因模型,以更好地理解CDS和ADHD维度的差异及其在发育过程中的变化。