Gloor Severin, Quante Marcel, Lehmann Beat, Schnüriger Beat
Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern, 3010, Switzerland.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern, Switzerland.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 27;51(1):242. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02913-8.
Despite global efforts to reduce trauma-related morbidity and mortality, diagnostic and therapeutic errors occur due to the urgency and complexity of care. Trauma morbidity and mortality (Trauma M&M) conferences aim to identify and address such errors to improve clinical outcomes. While most existing data on Trauma M&M conferences originate from the US, insights from Western Europe remain scarce.
This single-center, retrospective case series analyzed trauma patients discussed at the monthly Trauma M&M at a Swiss Level I trauma center over 10 years (2013–2022). Data were collected from Trauma M&M records and electronic medical charts, including demographics, injury characteristics, timelines, and documented errors. A novel error categorization system was developed, encompassing communication, skill/knowledge deficits, delays, missed injuries, and deviations from algorithms.
Out of 198 trauma cases reviewed, 189 with complete data were further analyzed. The median Injury Severity Score was 32 (IQR 25–43). Of these patients, 77% died within 90 days. A total of 130 potential errors were identified, with communication errors ( = 29) being the most frequent, followed by skill/knowledge deficits ( = 24) and procedural delays ( = 19). Communication errors often triggered subsequent errors, such as missed diagnoses, under-triage, and deviations from protocols. Discussions during the Trauma M&M led to the introduction or refinement of clinical algorithms, including updates to triage protocols.
Communication errors emerged as the leading cause of errors in trauma care, highlighting the need for focused communication training. The Trauma M&M serves as an essential platform for interdisciplinary collaboration, quality improvement, and education. Future research should explore the ripple effects of communication errors and evaluate targeted interventions to optimize trauma care systems.
尽管全球都在努力降低创伤相关的发病率和死亡率,但由于救治的紧迫性和复杂性,仍会出现诊断和治疗错误。创伤发病率和死亡率(Trauma M&M)会议旨在识别并解决此类错误,以改善临床结果。虽然目前关于Trauma M&M会议的大多数数据来自美国,但西欧的相关见解仍然很少。
本单中心回顾性病例系列分析了在瑞士一家一级创伤中心10年(2013 - 2022年)间每月的Trauma M&M会议上讨论的创伤患者。数据从Trauma M&M记录和电子病历中收集,包括人口统计学信息、损伤特征、时间线和记录的错误。开发了一种新颖的错误分类系统,包括沟通、技能/知识缺陷、延误、漏诊损伤以及与算法的偏差。
在审查的198例创伤病例中,对189例有完整数据的病例进行了进一步分析。损伤严重程度评分中位数为32(四分位间距25 - 43)。这些患者中,77%在90天内死亡。共识别出130个潜在错误,其中沟通错误(n = 29)最为常见,其次是技能/知识缺陷(n = 24)和程序延误(n = 19)。沟通错误常常引发后续错误,如漏诊、分诊不足和偏离方案。Trauma M&M会议期间的讨论导致了临床算法的引入或完善,包括分诊方案的更新。
沟通错误成为创伤救治中错误的主要原因,凸显了针对性沟通培训的必要性。Trauma M&M会议是跨学科协作、质量改进和教育的重要平台。未来的研究应探讨沟通错误的连锁反应,并评估针对性干预措施以优化创伤救治系统。