Numprasanthai Apisit, Chanpiwat Penradee
Department of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330Thailand.
Center of Excellence in Environmental Innovation and Management of Metals (EnvIMM), Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330Thailand.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1093/inteam/vjaf080.
Demand for materials to support economic and social development has made the mining and materials production industry one of the most energy-intensive sectors and a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study quantified the energy intensity for all potash production processes throughout the mine lifetime and the GHG emissions and intensities of potash production under different energy supply scenarios (purchased grid electricity alone or a combination of grid electricity and self-generated electricity using local biomass as fuel feedstock). A total of 40.4%, 42.5% and 17.1% of the overall energy demand is distributed to the energy required for ore extraction, potash recovery, and daily project operations, respectively. The overall energy intensities (MJ/ton of potash concentrate produced) are lower during the production phase (1,028 ± 13) than during the mine development (5,003 ± 2,766) and closure (1,759 ± 430) phases because 1.5 to 2.3 more ore is extracted in the former phase. The assessment of total GHG emissions confirmed lower annual emissions from the project operation solely based on grid electricity (153.18 kt CO2 eq) than those of the operations based on biomass electricity production using only palm kernel shells (283.67 to 287.42 kt CO2 eq) and a mixture of palm kernel shells and fuel woods (247.23 to 251.22 kt CO2 eq). Uncertainty analyses indicate 1.6- to 1.7-fold lower or 1.4-fold greater total annual GHG emissions than emissions estimated via a deterministic calculation approach. Over the 20-year project lifetime, a maximum of 5,748.4 kt CO2 eq will be emitted if electricity is generated from the combustion of 100% palm kernel shells. The differences in the environmental performance of potash production observed through comparisons of GHG emission intensities between this study and other potash production companies are caused mainly by the mining method, source of energy for project operation and utilization of renewable energy.
支持经济和社会发展对材料的需求,使采矿和材料生产行业成为能源密集度最高的行业之一,也是温室气体(GHG)排放的主要贡献者。本研究量化了整个矿山寿命期内所有钾肥生产过程的能源强度,以及不同能源供应情景下(仅购买电网电力,或使用当地生物质作为燃料原料的电网电力和自备电力的组合)钾肥生产的温室气体排放和强度。总体能源需求中,分别有40.4%、42.5%和17.1%分配到矿石开采、钾肥回收和日常项目运营所需的能源上。生产阶段的总体能源强度(每生产一吨钾肥精矿的兆焦耳数)(1,028 ± 13)低于矿山开发阶段(5,003 ± 2,766)和闭坑阶段(1,759 ± 430),因为前一阶段开采的矿石多1.5至2.3倍。对温室气体总排放量的评估证实,仅基于电网电力的项目运营年排放量(153.18 kt二氧化碳当量)低于仅使用棕榈仁壳进行生物质发电的运营排放量(283.67至287.42 kt二氧化碳当量)以及棕榈仁壳和薪材混合发电运营排放量(247.23至251.22 kt二氧化碳当量)。不确定性分析表明,与通过确定性计算方法估算的排放量相比,年度温室气体总排放量低1.6至1.7倍或高1.4倍。在20年的项目寿命期内,如果100%燃烧棕榈仁壳发电,最多将排放5,748.4 kt二氧化碳当量。通过本研究与其他钾肥生产公司的温室气体排放强度比较所观察到的钾肥生产环境绩效差异,主要是由采矿方法、项目运营能源来源和可再生能源利用造成的。