Intrapiromkul Jarunee, Rai Ansaar T, Lakhani Dhairya A
Department of Neuroradiology, WVU Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, WVU Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2025-023699.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting and transverse venous sinus (TVS) stenting are promising treatment choices for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), addressing different aspects of IIH pathophysiology. However, large-scale comparative data remain limited.
We performed a multinational, multi-institutional, retrospective propensity score-matched analysis using the TriNetX platform. Adult patients diagnosed with IIH who underwent either TVS stenting or CSF shunting were included. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as the need for subsequent procedures (repeat TVS stenting, CSF shunt, or optic nerve fenestration). Secondary outcomes included residual symptoms (headache, visual disturbances, dizziness, and pulsatile tinnitus), ongoing use of IIH-related medications (furosemide, acetazolamide, and topiramate), and healthcare utilization, assessed through unplanned hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits at 1 year follow-up.
Of 134 530 IIH patients identified, 1362 underwent TVS stenting and 5278 underwent CSF shunting. After propensity score matching, patients who received TVS stenting had significantly lower odds of repeat interventions (9.6% vs 38.6%; OR 0.169, 95% CI 0.136 to 0.212, P<0.001). They also had significantly lower odds of residual headache, visual disturbances, and papilledema. However, stenting was associated with higher odds of persistent pulsatile tinnitus (6.7% vs 2.2%; OR 3.183, P<0.001). TVS stenting was associated with lower odds of unplanned inpatient readmissions (24.1% vs 40.5%; OR 0.466, P<0.001) and ED visits (22.0% vs 34.0%; OR 0.548, P<0.001).
Both TVS stenting and CSF shunting resulted in symptomatic improvement and reduced medication use in patients with IIH. However, stenting was associated with significantly lower treatment failure rates, fewer residual papilledema, headaches and visual symptoms, and reduced healthcare utilization. Persistent pulsatile tinnitus was more common following stenting.
脑脊液(CSF)分流术和横窦静脉(TVS)支架置入术是特发性颅内高压(IIH)很有前景的治疗选择,可解决IIH病理生理学的不同方面。然而,大规模的比较数据仍然有限。
我们使用TriNetX平台进行了一项跨国、多机构的回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。纳入了诊断为IIH并接受TVS支架置入术或CSF分流术的成年患者。主要结局是治疗失败,定义为需要后续手术(重复TVS支架置入术、CSF分流术或视神经开窗术)。次要结局包括残留症状(头痛、视觉障碍、头晕和搏动性耳鸣)、持续使用与IIH相关的药物(呋塞米、乙酰唑胺和托吡酯)以及医疗资源利用情况,通过1年随访时的非计划住院再入院和急诊科就诊情况进行评估。
在134530例确诊的IIH患者中,1362例接受了TVS支架置入术,5278例接受了CSF分流术。倾向评分匹配后,接受TVS支架置入术的患者再次干预的几率显著较低(9.6%对38.6%;OR 0.169,95%CI 0.136至0.212,P<0.001)。他们残留头痛、视觉障碍和视乳头水肿的几率也显著较低。然而,支架置入术与持续性搏动性耳鸣的几率较高相关(6.7%对2.2%;OR 3.183,P<0.001)。TVS支架置入术与非计划住院再入院(24.1%对40.5%;OR 0.466,P<0.001)和急诊科就诊(22.0%对34.0%;OR 0.548,P<0.001)的几率较低相关。
TVS支架置入术和CSF分流术均使IIH患者的症状得到改善,并减少了药物使用。然而,支架置入术的治疗失败率显著较低,残留视乳头水肿、头痛和视觉症状较少,医疗资源利用减少。支架置入术后持续性搏动性耳鸣更为常见。