Keczer Bánk, Varga Balázs, Széll János, Szijártó Attila, Darvas Katalin, Szabó Marcell
1 Semmelweis Egyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Sebészeti, Transzplantációs és Gasztroenterológiai Klinika Budapest, Üllői út 78., 1082 Magyarország.
Orv Hetil. 2025 Jun 29;166(26):1003-1016. doi: 10.1556/650.2025.33314.
Hepatopancreatobiliary surgeries are complex procedures associated with significant perioperative pain. Adequate pain relief improves patient comfort, contributes to faster recovery, and reduces the risk of complications. While thoracic epidural analgesia remains the first-line option for open pancreatic surgeries, its use in liver resections is debated. There is growing experience and increasing emphasis on alternative neuraxial and regional techniques. We aimed to perform a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials focused on neuraxial and regional anesthesia methods in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. A structured PubMed® search was performed. We reviewed 47 randomized, controlled studies. Epidural analgesia continues to provide excellent pain relief, but there is a higher need for volume replacement and vasoactive agents. Intrathecal morphine administration is a viable alternative, particularly for laparoscopic procedures, though it is associated with a higher incidence of itching and nausea. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as erector spinae and transversus abdominis plane blocks, effectively reduce postoperative opioid requirements and related side effects, but their analgesic effects are inferior to epidural analgesia. Results from paravertebral and quadratus lumborum blocks are inconsistent, with their effectiveness not yet clearly established. Continuous wound infusion catheters are increasingly used to reduce opioid consumption. The optimal choice of technique is a multidisciplinary decision, considering patient risks, comorbidities, and surgical methods, with an increasing focus on novel approaches. Orv Hetil. 2025; 166(26): 1003–1016.
肝胰胆手术是复杂的手术,伴有显著的围手术期疼痛。充分的疼痛缓解可提高患者舒适度,促进更快康复,并降低并发症风险。虽然胸段硬膜外镇痛仍是开放性胰腺手术的一线选择,但在肝切除术中的应用存在争议。对于替代的神经轴和区域技术,经验日益丰富,且越来越受到重视。我们旨在对聚焦于肝胰胆手术中神经轴和区域麻醉方法的随机对照试验进行系统评价。进行了结构化的PubMed®检索。我们回顾了47项随机对照研究。硬膜外镇痛继续提供出色的疼痛缓解,但对容量补充剂和血管活性药物的需求更高。鞘内注射吗啡是一种可行的替代方法,特别是对于腹腔镜手术,尽管它与瘙痒和恶心的发生率较高有关。区域麻醉技术,如竖脊肌和腹横肌平面阻滞,可有效降低术后阿片类药物需求及相关副作用,但其镇痛效果不如硬膜外镇痛。椎旁阻滞和腰方肌阻滞的结果不一致,其有效性尚未明确确立。持续伤口灌注导管越来越多地用于减少阿片类药物消耗。技术的最佳选择是一个多学科决策,要考虑患者风险、合并症和手术方法,且越来越关注新方法。《匈牙利医学周报》。2025年;166(26):1003–1016。