Obara Keisuke, Takahashi Sana, Otake Miho, Fujiwara Mako, Kato Daiki, Tanaka Momoko, Ura Tomohiro, Yamashita Mio, Murata Azusa, Yoshioka Kento, Kusakabe Taichi, Takahashi Keisuke, Kato Keisuke, Tanaka Yoshio
Department of Chemical Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Funabashi, Chiba 274-8510, Japan.
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Funabashi, Chiba 274-8510, Japan.
Biol Pharm Bull. 2025;48(6):932-940. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b25-00233.
We examined the contribution of L-type voltage-dependent Ca channels (VDCCs) and non-VDCCs to platelet-activating factor (PAF)-induced contractions of rat esophageal smooth muscle (ESM). We also attempted to obtain more detailed information about the non-VDCC molecules involved in the PAF effect. PAF (10 M)-induced contractions were abolished in Ca-free solution containing ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid and were attenuated by diltiazem (10 M), a VDCC inhibitor. PAF-induced contractions in the presence of diltiazem were inhibited by approx. 50% by LOE-908 (3 × 10 M), an inhibitor of receptor-operated Ca channels (ROCCs), and were strongly inhibited by LOE-908 plus SKF-96365 (3 × 10 M), an inhibitor of both ROCCs and store-operated Ca channels (SOCCs). The contribution of each Ca channel was estimated to be approx. 25% for VDCCs, approx. 30% for ROCCs, and approx. 35% for SOCCs. Among the non-VDCC-related molecular candidates examined in rat ESM, Trpv4, Trpc6, and Trpc3 were abundant ROCC-related mRNAs, and Orai1 was the most abundant SOCC-related mRNAs. However, PAF-induced contractions in the presence of diltiazem were not significantly inhibited by combination treatment with putative inhibitors of transient receptor potential V4 (TRPV4) (GSK 2193874, 3 × 10 M), TRPC6 (SAR7334, 10 M), and TRPC3 (Pyr10, 3 × 10 M). In contrast, PAF-induced contractions in the presence of both diltiazem and LOE-908 were completely inhibited by Synta66 (10 M), an Orai1 inhibitor, which also inhibited PAF-induced contractions by approx. 30% in the absence of Ca channel inhibitors. These findings indicate that PAF-induced rat ESM contractions depend on extracellular Ca influx through VDCCs, ROCCs, and SOCCs, with Orai1 being the key SOCC molecule.
我们研究了L型电压依赖性钙通道(VDCCs)和非VDCCs对血小板活化因子(PAF)诱导的大鼠食管平滑肌(ESM)收缩的作用。我们还试图获取更多关于PAF效应中涉及的非VDCC分子的详细信息。在含有乙二醇双(2-氨基乙醚)-N,N,N',N'-四乙酸的无钙溶液中,PAF(10 μM)诱导的收缩被消除,并且被VDCC抑制剂地尔硫䓬(10 μM)减弱。在存在地尔硫䓬的情况下,PAF诱导的收缩被受体操纵性钙通道(ROCCs)抑制剂LOE-908(3×10 μM)抑制约50%,并且被ROCCs和储存操纵性钙通道(SOCCs)的双重抑制剂LOE-908加SKF-96365(3×10 μM)强烈抑制。估计每个钙通道的贡献约为:VDCCs为25%,ROCCs为30%,SOCCs为35%。在大鼠ESM中检测的与非VDCC相关的分子候选物中,Trpv4、Trpc6和Trpc3是丰富的与ROCC相关的mRNA,而Orai1是最丰富的与SOCC相关的mRNA。然而,在存在地尔硫䓬的情况下,PAF诱导的收缩未被瞬时受体电位V4(TRPV4)(GSK 2193874,3×10 μM)、TRPC6(SAR7334,10 μM)和TRPC3(Pyr10,3×10 μM)的推定抑制剂联合处理显著抑制。相反,在存在地尔硫䓬和LOE-908的情况下,PAF诱导的收缩被Orai1抑制剂Synta66(10 μM)完全抑制,在没有钙通道抑制剂的情况下,Synta66也将PAF诱导的收缩抑制约30%。这些发现表明,PAF诱导的大鼠ESM收缩依赖于通过VDCCs、ROCCs和SOCCs的细胞外钙内流,其中Orai1是关键的SOCC分子。