• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床疑似子宫颈癌前病变和癌性病变患者的高危型人乳头瘤病毒基因分型

High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus Genotyping in Patients with Clinically Suspected Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions of Cervix.

作者信息

Rashid J S, Rahman P, Khan R R, Afrin S S, Mudi N, Saha M K, Yeasmin F, Karim S S, Dewan R K, Zaman P, Rahman M

机构信息

Dr Jubyda Shahnur Rashid, Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh.; E-mail:

出版信息

Mymensingh Med J. 2025 Jul;34(3):816-824.

PMID:40583674
Abstract

Nowadays, human papilloma virus (HPV) testing has been added with cytology to aid in detection of high-grade cervical lesions, especially in women aged ≥30 years. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between high-risk HPV (hrHPV) genotype and clinicopathological parameters among the diagnosed patients with both precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions. This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Pathology of Dhaka Medical College and in the collaboration with 'DNA Solution LTD, Dhaka', Bangladesh. The study was conducted over a period of 24 months from July 2018 to June 2020. Following informed written consent, a total of 51 women (18 patients with clinically suspected malignant lesions and 33 with a positive VIA test) were included in this study, and all were subjected to colposcopic examination performed by a gynecologist. Ethical issues were ensured in accordance with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. SPSS version 24.0 was used during data analysis. The average age ±SD of the patients with cervical lesions was 41.86±9.84 years with a range from 25 to 60 years. Approximately half of the participants (n=25, 49.0%) were married for less than 16 years and almost one-tenth were multiparous. Among all cytological and histological findings, hrHPV-16 (n=21, 41.18%) was commonest, followed by hrHPV-18 (n=3, 5.88%) and hrHPV-68 (n=1, 1.96%). Two patients had co-infection with hrHPV (16, 18) and hrHPV (16, 51) in particular. However, the rest 24 cases remained undetected. Among the hrHPV-positive cases (n=27), hrHPV-16 was detected in 5 cases while those were negative for intraepithelial lesions. In cervical swabs, 6 cases of hrHPV-16, 2 cases of hrHPV-18 and one case of co-infection hrHPV (16, 18) were histologically diagnosed as invasive SCC G-II. Among 51 cases, the most common histological diagnosis was CIN I (n=18, 35.3%). hrHPV genotyping was found to be associated with cytological findings and histological diagnosis.

摘要

如今,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测已与细胞学检查相结合,以帮助检测高级别宫颈病变,尤其是在30岁及以上的女性中。本研究旨在评估诊断为宫颈癌前病变和癌性病变患者中高危型HPV(hrHPV)基因型与临床病理参数之间的关系。这项横断面研究在达卡医学院病理学系进行,并与孟加拉国达卡的“DNA Solution LTD”合作开展。该研究从2018年7月至2020年6月,历时24个月。在获得知情书面同意后,本研究共纳入51名女性(18例临床疑似恶性病变患者和33例醋酸白试验阳性患者),所有患者均接受了妇科医生进行的阴道镜检查。按照1975年《赫尔辛基宣言》确保了伦理问题。数据分析使用SPSS 24.0版。宫颈病变患者的平均年龄±标准差为41.86±9.84岁,年龄范围为25至60岁。大约一半的参与者(n = 25,49.0%)结婚不到16年,近十分之一为经产妇。在所有细胞学和组织学检查结果中,hrHPV - 16(n = 21,41.18%)最为常见,其次是hrHPV - 18(n = 3,5.88%)和hrHPV - 68(n = 1,1.96%)。特别是有2例患者同时感染了hrHPV(16,18)和hrHPV(16,51)。然而,其余24例未检测到。在hrHPV阳性病例(n = 27)中,有5例检测到hrHPV - 16,而这些病例的上皮内病变为阴性。在宫颈拭子中,6例hrHPV - 16、2例hrHPV - 18和1例hrHPV(16,18)合并感染在组织学上被诊断为浸润性鳞状细胞癌G-II级。在51例病例中,最常见的组织学诊断为CIN I(n = 18,35.3%)。发现hrHPV基因分型与细胞学检查结果和组织学诊断相关。

相似文献

1
High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus Genotyping in Patients with Clinically Suspected Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions of Cervix.临床疑似子宫颈癌前病变和癌性病变患者的高危型人乳头瘤病毒基因分型
Mymensingh Med J. 2025 Jul;34(3):816-824.
2
Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.接种人乳头瘤病毒预防性疫苗以预防宫颈癌及其癌前病变。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3.
3
Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.普通人群宫颈癌筛查中细胞学检查与HPV检测的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD008587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2.
4
The Significance of Extended HPV Genotyping for Detecting Endocervical Glandular Neoplasia for Atypical Glandular Cells.扩展HPV基因分型对检测子宫颈管腺性肿瘤中不典型腺细胞的意义
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2025 Jul 1;29(3):223-228. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000886. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
5
The Utility of an Human Papillomavirus Genotype Assay for Cancer Screening in Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples from Japanese Women.人乳头瘤病毒基因分型检测在日本女性自行采集的尿液和阴道样本癌症筛查中的效用
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025;90(2):143-152. doi: 10.1159/000541641. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
6
Genotype, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and type-specific cervical intraepithelial neoplasia distributions in hrHPV+ cases referred to colposcopy: A multicenter study of Chinese mainland women.人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)阳性病例转诊行阴道镜检查的基因分型、宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)和特定型别宫颈上皮内瘤变的分布:一项中国大陆女性的多中心研究。
J Med Virol. 2024 Mar;96(3):e29475. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29475.
7
Genotyping for Human Papillomavirus Types 16 and 18 in Women With Minor Cervical Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.HPV 16 和 18 型基因分型在宫颈轻度病变女性中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jan 17;166(2):118-127. doi: 10.7326/M15-2735. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
8
[Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].[卫生技术评估报告。液基细胞学在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33.
9
High-risk human papillomavirus testing versus cytology in predicting post-treatment disease in women treated for high-grade cervical disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测与细胞学检查在预测高级别宫颈疾病治疗后疾病中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):500-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
10
Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test.在未进行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测的情况下,对于轻度宫颈细胞学异常,立即转诊至阴道镜检查与细胞学监测的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 26;1(1):CD009836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009836.pub2.