文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

针对新诊断为癌症的青少年和青年的决策支持干预措施评估:一项试点随机试验。

Evaluation of a Decision Support Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults Newly Diagnosed with Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Barakat Lamia P, Hammer Shannon N, Wen Yansong, Anil Ashley, Schwartz Lisa A, Reilly Anne, Bagatell Rochelle, Schapira Marilyn M, Li Yimei, Deatrick Janet A

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jun 26;10(1):23814683251344624. doi: 10.1177/23814683251344624. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.


DOI:10.1177/23814683251344624
PMID:40584145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12202930/
Abstract

UNLABELLED: Limited involvement in treatment-related decision making can affect adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer outcomes and well-being. Information on developmentally consistent approaches to enhance involvement in and experiences with decision making is lacking. In a pilot randomized trial, we evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of a Web-based decision support intervention (DECIDES) for treatment-related decisions, with/without coach support. Newly diagnosed/relapsed AYA (15-24 y old) and caregivers were randomized to usual care ( = 11), DECIDES ( = 21), or DECIDES+ ( = 21 with a coach). Feedback on DECIDES was obtained in interviews with AYA and caregivers (DECIDES, DECIDES+) and oncology clinicians ( = 13). Feasibility, acceptability, and usability are described. Quantitative data were integrated with qualitative data. Mean differences (MDs) between DECIDES groups and usual care at 8 wk after randomization are presented for knowledge, decision-making involvement, and decision processes. High retention was achieved. High acceptability and good-excellent usability of DECIDES were reported; qualitative data were congruent with these ratings. AYA and caregivers with a coach demonstrated higher engagement with DECIDES. Based on the MDs, as compared with usual care, AYA (DECIDES and DECIDES+) reported higher shared decision making (MD = 12.58, 11.93), higher decision-making involvement (MD = 19.31, 9.78), and lower decision regret (MD = -13.19, -16.55), respectively, and caregivers (DECIDES, DECIDES+) reported higher shared decision making and AYA decision-making involvement. Minimal changes to knowledge were observed. DECIDES is feasible, acceptable, and usable for AYA treatment-related decision making with possible increases in AYA involvement. Findings suggest that decision support interventions warrant further evaluation for AYA across the treatment trajectory and for a range of treatment-related decisions. Delivery closer to the initial diagnosis and inclusion of a coach for engagement may be advantageous. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT ID No. NCT06191679). HIGHLIGHTS: Adolescents and young adults with newly diagnosed cancer, and their caregivers, endorsed that decision support is important for their understanding of cancer and treatment and for enhanced communication with their health care teams.Implementation of a decision support intervention shortly after cancer diagnosis is acceptable, feasible, and usable for adolescents and young adults and their caregivers.Oncology clinicians confirm the usability of decision support interventions for their adolescent and young adult patients at diagnosis.Access to a decision support intervention at diagnosis may improve the involvement of adolescents and young adults in their treatment-related decision making and decision processes.Future studies can continue to refine the content and delivery of decision support interventions close to the time of diagnosis, including value of a coach and the role of the caregiver, and targeted to a range of treatment-related decisions.

摘要

未标注:在与治疗相关的决策制定过程中参与有限,可能会影响青少年和青年(AYA)癌症患者的治疗结果和幸福感。目前缺乏关于采用与发育阶段相适应的方法来增强决策参与度和体验的相关信息。在一项试点随机试验中,我们评估了一种基于网络的决策支持干预措施(DECIDES)在有/无教练支持的情况下,用于与治疗相关决策的可行性、可接受性和可用性。新诊断/复发的AYA(15 - 24岁)及其照顾者被随机分配至常规护理组(n = 11)、DECIDES组(n = 21)或DECIDES +组(n = 21,有一名教练)。通过对AYA及其照顾者(DECIDES组、DECIDES +组)以及肿瘤临床医生(n = 13)进行访谈,获取了关于DECIDES的反馈。描述了其可行性、可接受性和可用性。定量数据与定性数据相结合。给出了随机分组8周后,DECIDES组与常规护理组在知识、决策参与度和决策过程方面的平均差异(MD)。实现了高保留率。报告显示DECIDES具有较高的可接受性和良好至优秀的可用性;定性数据与这些评分结果一致。有教练指导的AYA及其照顾者对DECIDES的参与度更高。基于平均差异,与常规护理相比,AYA(DECIDES组和DECIDES +组)分别报告了更高的共同决策(MD = 12.58,11.93)、更高的决策参与度(MD = 19.31,9.78)以及更低的决策后悔感(MD = -13.19,-16.55),照顾者(DECIDES组、DECIDES +组)报告了更高的共同决策和AYA的决策参与度。观察到知识方面的变化极小。DECIDES对于AYA与治疗相关的决策制定是可行、可接受且可用的,可能会增加AYA的参与度。研究结果表明,决策支持干预措施值得在AYA患者的整个治疗过程中,针对一系列与治疗相关决策进行进一步评估。在更接近初始诊断时提供干预措施并纳入一名教练以促进参与,可能会更具优势。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT ID编号:NCT06191679)。 重点:新诊断癌症的青少年和青年及其照顾者认可决策支持对于他们理解癌症和治疗以及加强与医疗团队沟通的重要性。癌症诊断后不久实施决策支持干预措施,对于青少年和青年及其照顾者来说是可接受、可行且可用的。肿瘤临床医生确认决策支持干预措施在诊断时对其青少年和青年患者的可用性。在诊断时获得决策支持干预措施可能会提高青少年和青年在与治疗相关决策制定和决策过程中的参与度。未来的研究可以继续在接近诊断时间时完善决策支持干预措施的内容和实施方式,包括教练的价值和照顾者的作用,并针对一系列与治疗相关的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c8d/12202930/b101efd0d7fc/10.1177_23814683251344624-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c8d/12202930/b101efd0d7fc/10.1177_23814683251344624-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c8d/12202930/b101efd0d7fc/10.1177_23814683251344624-fig1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Evaluation of a Decision Support Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults Newly Diagnosed with Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

MDM Policy Pract. 2025-6-26

[2]
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-11

[3]
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-3

[4]
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-4-29

[5]
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-8

[6]
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-6

[7]
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-10-5

[8]
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-20

[9]
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.

Syst Rev. 2024-11-26

[10]
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-7-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Reducing Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Outcome Disparities Through Optimized Care Delivery: A Blueprint from the Children's Oncology Group.

J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2023-6

[2]
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.

Implement Sci. 2022-10-29

[3]
Day-to-Day Decision Making by Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.

J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2022

[4]
Decisional conflicts, anxiety, and perceptions of shared decision-making in cancer treatment trajectory among adolescents with cancer: A longitudinal study.

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2022-9

[5]
Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Med Decis Making. 2021-10

[6]
Cancer-Related Decision-Making Among Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Oncology Providers.

Qual Health Res. 2021-11

[7]
Guidance and/or Decision Coaching with Patient Decision Aids: Scoping Reviews to Inform the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS).

Med Decis Making. 2021-10

[8]
Contextual Predictors of Engagement in a Tailored mHealth Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors.

Ann Behav Med. 2021-11-18

[9]
3 Dimensions of Treatment Decision Making in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

Cancer Nurs. 2020

[10]
Identification of adolescents and young adults' preferences and priorities for future cancer treatment using a novel decision-making tool.

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索