Kulkarni Shrirangrao, Alanzi Ahmed, Koshy Lena, Babu Anjana R, Alrowaiei Aysha
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, King Hamad University Hospital, Busaiteen, BHR.
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, King Hamad University Hospital, Busaiteen, BHR.
Cureus. 2025 May 30;17(5):e85094. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85094. eCollection 2025 May.
Background Accidental dural puncture (ADP) during epidural catheter insertion in obstetric patients is a well-known complication that often results in post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Management strategies remain controversial, and the potential benefit of placing an intrathecal catheter (ITC) following ADP is yet to be conclusively established. Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the placement of an ITC following recognized ADP in parturients reduces the incidence of PDPH and the need for a therapeutic epidural blood patch (EBP). Methods This retrospective study analyzed 46 cases of recognized ADP in parturients undergoing labor analgesia. Patients were grouped based on subsequent management: those who received an ITC (n = 32) and those who did not (n = 14). The primary outcomes assessed were the incidence of PDPH and the requirement for EBP. Secondary analysis explored associations with demographic factors, including body mass index (BMI). Results PDPH occurred in 66.7% (n = 20) of patients in the ITC group and 71.4% (n = 10) in the non-ITC group (p = 0.433). An EBP was required in 29.0% (n = 9) of ITC cases compared to 35.7% (n = 5) in the non-ITC group (p = 0.594). Although a trend toward reduced EBP requirement was observed in the ITC group, the difference was not statistically significant. A higher BMI appeared to be associated with a reduced risk of PDPH; however, this association did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion ITC placement following ADP in parturients was associated with a trend toward reduced EBP requirement, though the difference was not statistically significant. No reduction in PDPH incidence was observed. These findings, while limited by sample size and study design, contribute region-specific real-world data to an evolving area of obstetric anesthesia. Further prospective, multicenter studies are needed to guide definitive recommendations.
产科患者硬膜外导管置入过程中的意外硬膜穿刺(ADP)是一种众所周知的并发症,常导致硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)。管理策略仍存在争议,ADP后放置鞘内导管(ITC)的潜在益处尚未得到最终证实。目的:本研究的目的是评估在已确认ADP的产妇中放置ITC是否能降低PDPH的发生率以及治疗性硬膜外血贴(EBP)的需求。方法:这项回顾性研究分析了46例接受分娩镇痛的产妇中已确认的ADP病例。患者根据后续管理进行分组:接受ITC的患者(n = 32)和未接受ITC的患者(n = 14)。评估的主要结局是PDPH的发生率和EBP的需求。二次分析探讨了与人口统计学因素的关联,包括体重指数(BMI)。结果:ITC组66.7%(n = 20)的患者发生了PDPH,非ITC组为71.4%(n = 10)(p = 0.43)。ITC病例中有29.0%(n = 9)需要EBP,而非ITC组为35.7%(n = 5)(p = 0.594)。尽管在ITC组中观察到EBP需求有降低的趋势,但差异无统计学意义。较高的BMI似乎与PDPH风险降低相关;然而,这种关联未达到统计学意义。结论:产妇ADP后放置ITC与EBP需求降低的趋势相关,尽管差异无统计学意义。未观察到PDPH发生率降低。这些发现虽然受样本量和研究设计的限制,但为产科麻醉这一不断发展的领域提供了特定区域的真实世界数据。需要进一步的前瞻性、多中心研究来指导明确的建议。