Schaumberg H H, Arezzo J, Otto D A, Eckerman D A
Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1985 Jul-Aug;7(4):351-3.
This manuscript reports the results of a problem-solving exercise presented to participants at a Workshop on Neurotoxicology Testing in Human Populations held in Rougemont, North Carolina in October, 1983. Response recommendations are the consensus of workshop participants. These are not comprehensive or definitive solutions and should be interpreted with caution. Each exposure scenario represents a "real world" situation previously encountered by neurologists and epidemiologists. Ideally, a toxin affects a single, easily tested modality early in the illness before producing a complex neurological syndrome. Unfortunately this rarely happens; difficult choices and compromises about testing are usually necessary. At the end of each scenario likely areas of early subtle dysfunction were discussed and possible testing methods were outlined. Working participants were instructed to comment on the approach to the scenarios and to add to or dispute the proposed tests. It is clear that there are no right or wrong answers; however, the participants were urged to try to reach some sort of consensus. In each instance participants assumed that they were being notified by the company and not by a state or federal agency, and were to determine what would be the most reasonable and effective way to offer help or obtain outside assistance in these situations.
本手稿报告了1983年10月在北卡罗来纳州鲁格蒙特举行的人类神经毒理学测试研讨会上向参与者提出的一个解决问题练习的结果。应对建议是研讨会参与者的共识。这些并非全面或决定性的解决方案,应谨慎解读。每个接触情景都代表了神经科医生和流行病学家之前遇到的“现实世界”情况。理想情况下,一种毒素在引发复杂的神经综合征之前,会在疾病早期影响单一且易于测试的功能模式。不幸的是,这种情况很少发生;通常需要在测试方面做出艰难的选择和妥协。在每个情景结束时,讨论了早期细微功能障碍可能出现的区域,并概述了可能的测试方法。要求参与的工作人员对情景处理方法发表评论,并对提议的测试进行补充或提出异议。显然,没有正确或错误的答案;然而,敦促参与者努力达成某种共识。在每种情况下,参与者都假定他们是由公司而非州或联邦机构通知的,并要确定在这些情况下提供帮助或获得外部援助的最合理、最有效的方式。