Krishnamoorthy Parasuram, Onishi Takayuki, Zaid Syed, Lerakis Stamatios, Safi Lucy M, Khera Sahil, Hooda Amit, Goel Sunny, Dangas George D, Sharma Samin K, Kini Annapoorna S, Tang Gilbert H L
Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug 25;18(16):1971-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.06.017. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) failure is becoming increasingly common. Although short-term outcomes appear favorable, no imaging after redo-TAVR has been performed to evaluate frame expansion and geometry.
The authors report a first-in-human experience using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and fluoroscopy to evaluate valve frame expansion and geometry of both index and second TAVs.
From January 2023 to April 2025, 30 of 40 consecutive patients underwent redo-TAVR for bioprosthetic valve failure and had evaluable postprocedural MDCT. Index TAVs were predilated in 80% (24 of 30), and both TAVs were postdilated in all cases for frame optimization. Frame dimensions were measured using MDCT and fluoroscopy for both index and second TAVs at different levels. Valve expansion and eccentricity were calculated by comparing observed measurements with expected nominal measurements validated from previous studies.
TAV-in-TAV combinations were as follows: 8 of 30 (26.7%) short-in-short, 16 of 30 (53.3%) short-in-tall (15 Evolut, 1 Navitor), and 6 of 30 (20%) tall-in-short. Structural valve deterioration was the common mechanism of failure. Both MDCT and fluoroscopy showed that index TAVs were all underexpanded, and expansion was seen after redo-TAVR in all cases. The second TAVs were underexpanded across all valve types, but more so with tall-in-short (Evolut-in-SAPIEN) combination. No elevated valve gradients and no hypoattenuated leaflet thickening were observed at 30 days.
There was significant underexpansion of both index and second TAVs after redo-TAVR, irrespective of valve type and combinations. Larger studies are needed to validate this finding and determine the longer term impact of underexpansion of the second TAV, despite acceptable short-term hemodynamic performance.
因经导管主动脉瓣(TAV)功能衰竭而进行的再次经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)正变得越来越普遍。尽管短期结果似乎良好,但尚未进行再次TAVR后的成像检查来评估瓣膜框架扩张情况和几何形状。
作者报告了首例使用多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)和荧光透视法评估初次和第二次TAV的瓣膜框架扩张及几何形状的人体研究经验。
从2023年1月至2025年4月,40例连续患者中有30例因生物瓣膜功能衰竭接受了再次TAVR,且术后有可评估的MDCT。80%(30例中的24例)的初次TAV进行了预扩张,所有病例中的两次TAV均进行了后扩张以优化框架。使用MDCT和荧光透视法在不同层面测量初次和第二次TAV的框架尺寸。通过将观察到的测量值与先前研究验证的预期标称测量值进行比较,计算瓣膜扩张和偏心度。
TAV-in-TAV组合如下:30例中的8例(26.7%)为短对短,30例中的16例(53.3%)为短对高(15例Evolut,1例Navitor),30例中的6例(20%)为高对短。结构性瓣膜退变是常见的失败机制。MDCT和荧光透视法均显示初次TAV均扩张不足,且所有病例在再次TAVR后均出现了扩张。第二次TAV在所有瓣膜类型中均扩张不足,但高对短(Evolut-in-SAPIEN)组合更为明显。术后30天时未观察到瓣膜梯度升高和瓣叶增厚低密度影。
再次TAVR后,初次和第二次TAV均存在明显的扩张不足,与瓣膜类型和组合无关。尽管短期血流动力学性能可接受,但仍需要更大规模的研究来验证这一发现,并确定第二次TAV扩张不足的长期影响。