• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Redo-TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 valve in degenerated calcified CoreValve/Evolut explants.再次行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI),使用 SAPIEN 3 瓣膜置换衰败且严重钙化的 CoreValve/Evolut 瓣膜。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Nov 18;20(22):1390-1404. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00619.
2
Feasibility of redo-TAVI in the self-expanding ACURATE neo2 valve: a computed tomography study.自膨式 ACURATE neo2 瓣膜再次经导管主动脉瓣置换术的可行性:一项 CT 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Nov 18;20(22):1405-1415. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00367.
3
Impact of Calcified Raphe on TAVR in Bicuspid Patients: Predicting Redo-TAVR Feasibility and Virtual Planning Implications.钙化中隔对二叶式患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的影响:预测再次经导管主动脉瓣置换术的可行性及虚拟规划的意义
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jun;18(6):e014802. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014802. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
4
SAPIEN 3 versus Myval transcatheter heart valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (COMPARE-TAVI 1): a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial.经导管主动脉瓣植入术使用SAPIEN 3与Myval经导管心脏瓣膜对比研究(COMPARE-TAVI 1):一项多中心、随机、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2025 Apr 19;405(10487):1362-1372. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00106-0. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
5
Balloon-Expandable Valve for Treatment of Evolut Valve Failure: Implications on Neoskirt Height and Leaflet Overhang.球囊扩张瓣膜治疗 Evolut 瓣膜失效:对 Neoskirt 高度和瓣叶遮帘的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb 28;15(4):368-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.12.021.
6
The Coronary Access After TAVI (CAvEAT) Study: A Prospective Registry of CA After TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置入术后冠状动脉通路(CAvEAT)研究:一项经导管主动脉瓣置换术后冠状动脉通路的前瞻性登记研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jun 23;18(12):1571-1583. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.05.002.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with SAPIEN 3 versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low risk of surgical mortality: a cost-utility analysis for Switzerland.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(SAPIEN 3)与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低外科死亡率手术风险的有症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:瑞士的成本-效用分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024 Oct 24;154:3558. doi: 10.57187/s.3558.
8
Readmissions after next-day discharge following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后次日出院后的再入院情况。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Dec 16;20(24):e1505-e1519. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00514.
9
Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置入术(ViV-TAVI)中的瓣中瓣技术与再次外科主动脉瓣置换术(redo-SAVR):一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):661-671. doi: 10.1111/joic.12520. Epub 2018 May 20.
10
Early outcomes of the novel Myval THV series compared to SAPIEN THV series and Evolut THV series in individuals with severe aortic stenosis.新型Myval经导管心脏瓣膜系列与SAPIEN经导管心脏瓣膜系列和Evolut经导管心脏瓣膜系列在严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的早期疗效比较。
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jan 20;21(2):e105-e118. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00951.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of transcatheter heart valve type on outcomes of surgical explantation after failed transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the EXPLANT-TAVR international registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后失败行外科瓣置换术时不同经导管心脏瓣膜类型对结局的影响:EXPLANT-TAVR 国际注册研究。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Jan 15;20(2):e146-e157. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00722.
2
Contemporary guideline-directed management of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.当代指南指导下的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者管理。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Jan 15;20(2):e158-e167. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00469.
3
Feasibility of Redo-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Sapien Valves Based on In Vivo Computed Tomography Assessment.基于体内计算机断层扫描评估的经导管主动脉瓣置换术在 Sapien 瓣膜中的可行性。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;16(11):e013497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013497. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
4
Feasibility of Coronary Access Following Redo-TAVR for Evolut Failure: A Computed Tomography Simulation Study.经 Evolut 失败的再次 TAVR 后行冠状动脉入路的可行性:一项计算机断层扫描模拟研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;16(11):e013238. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013238. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
5
Challenges and Future Directions in Redo Aortic Valve Reintervention After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Failure.经导管主动脉瓣置换失败后再次行主动脉瓣干预的挑战与未来方向
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;16(11):e012966. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.012966. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
6
4-Year Outcomes of Patients With Aortic Stenosis in the Evolut Low Risk Trial.Evolut低风险试验中主动脉瓣狭窄患者的4年结局
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Nov 28;82(22):2163-2165. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.813. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
7
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在五年内的低危患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 23;389(21):1949-1960. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307447. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
8
Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement in degenerated transcatheter bioprosthesis (TAV-in-TAV).再次行经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗退行性经导管生物瓣(TAV-in-TAV)。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;21(10):703-712. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2266368. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
9
TAVR in TAVR: Where Are We in 2023 for Management of Failed TAVR Valves?经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中失败的 TAVR 瓣膜的处理:2023 年我们处于什么位置?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):1425-1431. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01959-7. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
10
Lifetime Management of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换时代严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的终生管理。
Can J Cardiol. 2024 Feb;40(2):210-217. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

再次行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI),使用 SAPIEN 3 瓣膜置换衰败且严重钙化的 CoreValve/Evolut 瓣膜。

Redo-TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 valve in degenerated calcified CoreValve/Evolut explants.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2024 Nov 18;20(22):1390-1404. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00619.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00619
PMID:39552484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11556406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Redo-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the treatment of choice for failed transcatheter aortic valves. Currently, implantation of a SAPIEN 3 (S3) is indicated for redo-TAVI in degenerated CoreValve/Evolut (CV/EV) transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs) but is not well understood.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate S3 function following implantation in explanted calcified CV/EV TAVs and to assess the impact of CV/EV pathology on redo-TAVI outcomes.

METHODS

Ex vivo hydrodynamic testing was performed per the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 5840-3 standard on 4 S3 TAVs implanted at node 5 in calcified CV/EV explants. The mean gradient (MG), effective orifice area (EOA), peak velocity, regurgitant fraction (RF), geometric orifice area (GOA), leaflet overhang, leaflet pinwheeling, neoskirt height, and frame deformation were evaluated.

RESULTS

CV/EV explants were calcified and stenotic. Following S3 implantation, the MG and peak velocity decreased. As per the ISO standard, all S3 implants showed adequate EOA, and 3 out of 4 had an RF within the accepted value (<20%). CV/EV leaflet overhang ranged from 25-37%. Calcified leaflets remained stationary throughout the cardiac cycle (difference <9%) and were not pinned in a manner that constrained S3 systolic flow or appeared to prevent selective frame cannulation. The downstream CV/EV GOA was larger than the upstream S3 GOA during systole. S3 frame underexpansion was seen, resulting in leaflet pinwheeling (range 13-30%). Above the neoskirt, calcium protrusion was observed in contact with the S3 leaflets.

CONCLUSIONS

S3 implantation at node 5 in calcified CV/EV valves resulted in satisfactory hydrodynamic performance in most configurations tested with stable leaflet overhang throughout the cardiac cycle. The long-term implications of S3 underexpansion, leaflet pinwheeling, and calcium protrusion require future studies.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)失败后的再次介入治疗是首选治疗方法。目前,SAPIEN 3(S3)瓣膜植入物适用于退行性 CoreValve/Evolut(CV/EV)经导管主动脉瓣(TAV)置换术后的再次 TAVI,但对其了解甚少。

目的

我们旨在评估在钙化的 CV/EV 经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 S3 瓣膜的功能,并评估 CV/EV 病理对再次 TAVI 结果的影响。

方法

按照国际标准化组织(ISO)5840-3 标准,对 4 个植入钙化 CV/EV 瓣叶标本中的节点 5 的 S3 经导管主动脉瓣进行体外血流动力学测试。评估平均梯度(MG)、有效开口面积(EOA)、峰值速度、反流分数(RF)、几何开口面积(GOA)、瓣叶突出、瓣叶涡旋、新裙边高度和框架变形。

结果

CV/EV 瓣叶钙化和狭窄。S3 植入后,MG 和峰值速度下降。根据 ISO 标准,所有 S3 植入物均显示出足够的 EOA,4 个中有 3 个 RF 值在可接受范围内(<20%)。CV/EV 瓣叶突出范围为 25-37%。钙化瓣叶在整个心动周期内保持静止(差异<9%),没有被固定在限制 S3 收缩期血流的方式,也没有出现瓣叶似乎阻止选择性框架插管的情况。收缩期时 CV/EV 下游 GOA 大于 S3 上游 GOA。S3 框架扩张不足,导致瓣叶涡旋(范围 13-30%)。在新裙边上方,观察到钙突与 S3 瓣叶接触。

结论

在钙化的 CV/EV 瓣叶中,节点 5 处的 S3 瓣膜植入物在大多数测试配置中均表现出满意的血流动力学性能,瓣叶突出在整个心动周期内保持稳定。S3 扩张不足、瓣叶涡旋和钙突的长期影响需要进一步研究。