Emotion. 2025 Aug;25(5):1107. doi: 10.1037/emo0001563. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
Reports an error in "The influence of pre- and intratask emotional experiences on affective working memory maintenance" by Nour Kardosh, Christian E. Waugh, Joseph A. Mikels and Nilly Mor (, Advanced Online Publication, Jan 16, 2025, np; see record 2025-70002-001). In the original article, there was an error in the Study 1 Method section regarding the duration of the distraction task. Under the Procedure heading in the Study 1 Method section, the sentence "After signing the consent form, participants completed the AWM task and a 2-min distraction task, in order to mitigate the memory effects on posttask ratings" should have said "After signing the consent form, participants completed the AWM task and a 3-min distraction task, in order to mitigate the memory effects on posttask ratings." The findings and conclusions of the article remain unchanged. (The following abstract appeared in the original article.) In two studies conducted in 2022, we examined the effect of images that elicit incidental emotions and the timing of exposure to these images, on the maintenance of positive and negative emotions in affective working memory (AWM). In Study 1, participants viewed a negative, positive, or neutral image while maintaining the emotional intensity of positive or negative emotions in AWM (intratrial). The results showed that experiencing a negative or positive incidental emotion (but not neutral states) improved the maintenance of negative (but not positive) emotions induced by another stimulus. In Study 2, participants were randomly assigned to experimental conditions. In the first condition, they viewed an emotion-eliciting image while maintaining an emotion elicited by a different image (replicating Study 1). In the second condition, they viewed the emotion-eliciting image before maintaining an emotion elicited by a different image. The results replicated those of Study 1 and showed that the timing of experiencing the incidental emotion (before or during the task) did not affect AWM. They also suggest that maintenance of negative emotions increases irrespective of the emotional context surrounding them. These findings offer valuable theoretical insights into the role of emotional contexts in intensifying negative emotions, potentially guiding future research on interventions designed to modulate negative emotions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
勘误“任务前和任务中情绪体验对情感工作记忆维持的影响”,作者为努尔·卡尔多什、克里斯蒂安·E·沃、约瑟夫·A·米凯尔斯和尼利·莫尔(《心理科学》,高级在线发表,2025年1月16日,np;见记录2025 - 70002 - 001)。在原文中,研究1方法部分关于分心任务持续时间存在错误。在研究1方法部分的程序标题下,句子“签署同意书后,参与者完成了情感工作记忆任务和一个2分钟的分心任务,以减轻记忆对任务后评分的影响”应改为“签署同意书后,参与者完成了情感工作记忆任务和一个3分钟的分心任务,以减轻记忆对任务后评分的影响”。文章的研究结果和结论保持不变。(以下摘要出现在原文中。)在2022年进行的两项研究中,我们考察了引发附带情绪的图像以及接触这些图像的时间对情感工作记忆(AWM)中积极和消极情绪维持的影响。在研究1中,参与者在情感工作记忆中维持积极或消极情绪的强度时(试验中)观看一张消极、积极或中性的图像。结果表明,体验消极或积极的附带情绪(但非中性状态)改善了由另一个刺激诱发的消极(而非积极)情绪的维持。在研究2中,参与者被随机分配到实验条件。在第一种条件下,他们在维持由不同图像诱发的情绪时观看一张引发情绪的图像(重复研究1)。在第二种条件下,他们在维持由不同图像诱发的情绪之前观看引发情绪的图像。结果重复了研究1的结果,表明体验附带情绪的时间(任务前或任务中)不影响情感工作记忆。研究结果还表明,无论围绕消极情绪的情感背景如何,消极情绪的维持都会增加。这些发现为情感背景在强化消极情绪中的作用提供了有价值的理论见解,可能会指导未来关于旨在调节消极情绪的干预措施的研究。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)