Li Yonghong, Chen Zhen, Tong Carmen H, Van Ky, Jones Robert S, Bare Lance A
Quest Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0327376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327376. eCollection 2025.
The modified two-tier test (MTTT) and standard two-tier test (STTT) protocols are being used for Lyme disease serology testing in the clinic. We aimed to compare the real-world testing results of MTTT, a recently approved protocol, vs STTT, a mainstay protocol over the past decades. To this end, we obtained results of Lyme disease testing performed in a US national reference laboratory in 2022 and 2023 and constructed a matched cohort with 66,708 individuals tested using MTTT and 66,708 individuals tested using STTT. We found that, compared with STTT, MTTT identified more test positives in adults aged 18 and older and similar number of test positives in the children and adolescents. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of testing positive using MTTT vs STTT was 1.88 (1.79-1.98) in adults and 1.09 (0.97-1.23) in non-adults. In addition, more patients tested positive for immunoglobulin M antibody alone or positive for both immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G antibodies using MTTT than STTT.
改良的两层测试(MTTT)和标准两层测试(STTT)方案正在临床中用于莱姆病血清学检测。我们旨在比较最近获批的MTTT方案与过去几十年的主要方案STTT在实际检测中的结果。为此,我们获取了2022年和2023年在美国一家国家参考实验室进行的莱姆病检测结果,并构建了一个匹配队列,其中66,708人使用MTTT进行检测,66,708人使用STTT进行检测。我们发现,与STTT相比,MTTT在18岁及以上成年人中识别出更多检测阳性者,在儿童和青少年中检测阳性者数量相似。MTTT与STTT相比检测呈阳性的优势比(95%置信区间)在成年人中为1.88(1.79 - 1.98),在非成年人中为1.09(0.97 - 1.23)。此外,与STTT相比,使用MTTT检测仅免疫球蛋白M抗体呈阳性或免疫球蛋白M和免疫球蛋白G抗体均呈阳性的患者更多。