• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业检测试剂盒在改良两步法血清学诊断莱姆病中的应用比较评估。

Comparative Evaluation of Commercial Test Kits Cleared for Use in Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithms for Serodiagnosis of Lyme Disease.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 14;230(Supplement_1):S76-S81. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae229.

DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiae229
PMID:39140717
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modified 2-tiered testing (MTTT) for Lyme disease utilizes automatable, high throughput immunoassays (AHTIs) in both tiers without involving western immunoblots, offering performance and practical advantages over standard 2-tiered testing (STTT; first-tier AHTI followed by immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) western immunoblots). For MTTT, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends using AHTI test kits that have been cleared by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) specifically for this intended use. We evaluated performance of FDA-cleared MTTT commercial test kits from 3 manufacturers by comparing with STTT results.

METHODS

We performed MTTT (total antibody AHTI with reflex to separate IgM and IgG AHTIs) using test kits from Diasorin, Gold Standard Diagnostics (GSD), and Zeus Scientific on 382 excess serum samples submitted to the clinical laboratory for routine Lyme disease serologic testing in July 2018, measuring agreement between MTTT and STTT using the κ statistic.

RESULTS

Overall agreement with STTT was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], .77-.97) using Diasorin assays (almost perfect agreement), 0.80 (95% CI, .68-.93) using GSD assays (substantial agreement) and 0.79 (95% CI, .68-.90) using Zeus assays (substantial agreement). For detection of IgM reactivity, agreement between MTTT and STTT was 0.70 (.51-.90; substantial), 0.63 (95% CI, .44-.82; substantial) and 0.56 (95% CI, .38-.73; moderate), respectively. For detection of IgG reactivity, MTTT/STTT agreement was 0.73 (95% CI,.58-.88), 0.78 (95% CI, .62-.94), and 0.75 (95% CI, .60-.90), respectively (substantial agreement in all cases).

CONCLUSIONS

MTTT results obtained using commercial test kits from 3 different manufacturers had substantial to almost perfect agreement with STTT results overall and moderate to substantial agreement for IgM and IgG detection independently. Commercial MTTT tests can be used broadly for the diagnosis of Lyme disease.

摘要

背景

莱姆病改良 2 级检测(MTTT)利用了两级中的自动化高通量免疫测定法(AHTI),而不涉及免疫印迹,与标准 2 级检测(STTT;第一级 AHTI 后进行免疫球蛋白 M(IgM)和免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)免疫印迹)相比,具有性能和实际优势。对于 MTTT,疾病控制与预防中心建议使用食品和药物管理局(FDA)专门为此预期用途批准的 AHTI 检测试剂盒。我们通过与 STTT 结果进行比较,评估了来自 3 家制造商的 FDA 批准的 MTTT 商业检测试剂盒的性能。

方法

我们使用 DiaSorin、Gold Standard Diagnostics(GSD)和 Zeus Scientific 的试剂盒在 2018 年 7 月对 382 份多余的血清样本进行 MTTT(总抗体 AHTI,反射性检测单独的 IgM 和 IgG AHTI),使用 κ 统计量测量 MTTT 与 STTT 之间的一致性。

结果

使用 DiaSorin 检测试剂盒的总一致性为 0.87(95%置信区间[CI],0.77-0.97)(几乎完美的一致性),使用 GSD 检测试剂盒的总一致性为 0.80(95% CI,0.68-0.93)(高度一致),使用 Zeus 检测试剂盒的总一致性为 0.79(95% CI,0.68-0.90)(高度一致)。对于 IgM 反应性的检测,MTTT 与 STTT 之间的一致性为 0.70(0.51-0.90;高度),0.63(95% CI,0.44-0.82;高度)和 0.56(95% CI,0.38-0.73;中度),分别。对于 IgG 反应性的检测,MTTT/STTT 一致性分别为 0.73(95% CI,0.58-0.88)、0.78(95% CI,0.62-0.94)和 0.75(95% CI,0.60-0.90)(在所有情况下均为高度一致)。

结论

使用来自 3 家不同制造商的商业 MTTT 检测试剂盒获得的结果与 STTT 结果总体上具有高度至几乎完美的一致性,并且对 IgM 和 IgG 的检测具有中度至高度的一致性。商业 MTTT 测试可广泛用于莱姆病的诊断。

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Commercial Test Kits Cleared for Use in Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithms for Serodiagnosis of Lyme Disease.商业检测试剂盒在改良两步法血清学诊断莱姆病中的应用比较评估。
J Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 14;230(Supplement_1):S76-S81. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae229.
2
Performance of two modified two-tier algorithms for the serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease.两种改良型两步法在莱姆病血清学诊断中的性能比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 May 8;62(5):e0013924. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00139-24. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
3
Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithms for Lyme Disease Using Zeus Scientific Commercial Assays.使用 Zeus Scientific 商业检测试剂盒对改良两阶段检测算法在莱姆病中的多中心临床评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 May 18;60(5):e0252821. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02528-21. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
4
Evaluation of bioMérieux's Dissociated Vidas Lyme IgM II and IgG II as a First-Tier Diagnostic Assay for Lyme Disease.对生物梅里埃公司的解离型Vidas莱姆IgM II和IgG II作为莱姆病一线诊断检测方法的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jun;55(6):1698-1706. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02407-16. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
5
Clinical evaluation of a Borrelia modified two-tiered testing (MTTT) shows increased early sensitivity for Borrelia burgdorferi but not other endemic Borrelia species in a high incidence region for Lyme disease in Wisconsin.临床评估表明,博莱霉素改良双级检测(MTTT)对伯氏疏螺旋体具有更高的早期敏感性,但对威斯康星州莱姆病高发地区的其他地方性博莱霉素物种则没有。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Jan;105(1):115837. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115837. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
6
Performance of a Modified Two-Tiered Testing Enzyme Immunoassay Algorithm for Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Nova Scotia.新斯科舍省莱姆病血清学诊断改良双层检测酶免疫分析算法的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jun 24;58(7). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01841-19.
7
Evaluation of Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithms for Lyme Disease Laboratory Diagnosis Using Well-Characterized Serum Samples.评价使用特征明确的血清样本进行莱姆病实验室诊断的改良两阶段检测算法。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jul 26;56(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01943-17. Print 2018 Aug.
8
Evaluation of the rapid Quidel Sofia Lyme fluorescent immunoassay as a first-tier test in a modified 2-tier testing algorithm for Lyme disease: A comparison with the Zeus ELISA Borrelia VlsE1/pepC10 lgG/IgM assay followed by the Zeus monovalent IgM/IgG confirmatory assay.评价快速 Quidel Sofia 莱姆荧光免疫分析作为改良后的莱姆病二步检测算法的一线检测方法:与 Zeus ELISA Borrelia VlsE1/pepC10 lgG/IgM 检测试剂盒比较,然后进行 Zeus 单价 IgM/IgG 确认检测。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2023 Dec 1;160(6):599-602. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad094.
9
Evaluation of the Modified Two-Tiered Testing Method for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Children.评价改良的两阶段检测方法在儿童莱姆病诊断中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00547-19. Print 2019 Oct.
10
Diagnostic parameters of modified two-tier testing in European patients with early Lyme disease.改良两阶段检测在欧洲早期莱姆病患者中的诊断参数。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;39(11):2143-2152. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03946-0. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Lyme-Borreliosis Disease: IgM Epitope Mapping and Evaluation of a Serological Assay Based on Immunodominant Bi-Specific Peptides.莱姆病:基于免疫显性双特异性肽的IgM表位作图及血清学检测评估
Biomedicines. 2025 Aug 8;13(8):1930. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081930.
2
A novel single-tier serologic test to diagnose all stages of Lyme disease.一种用于诊断莱姆病各阶段的新型单层血清学检测方法。
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Sep 10;63(9):e0048325. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00483-25. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
3
Real-world Lyme disease testing results using modified vs standard two-tier test protocols.
使用改良版与标准两层检测方案的莱姆病实际检测结果。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0327376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327376. eCollection 2025.