Suppr超能文献

药物涂层球囊与传统球囊治疗自体动静脉内瘘狭窄的比较。

Comparison of drug-coated balloon and conventional balloon in autologous arteriovenous fistula stenosis.

作者信息

Kang Ningsu, Qiu Yuxiang, Wang Xi, Zhang Pei, Cui Jun, Zheng Lu

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong Third People's Hospital, Nantong City, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 27;104(26):e42977. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042977.

Abstract

This study compares the effects of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and conventional balloon (CB) in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 149 patients with AVF stenosis admitted to our hospital between June 2021 and October 2023 in this retrospective study. Among them, 73 and 76 patients were treated with CB (CB group) and DCB (DCB group), respectively. The treatment outcomes, peak flow velocity at the stenosis site, dialysis blood flow rate, vessel diameter, biochemical index levels, and incidence of complications were compared between the 2 groups. The success rate of surgery in the DCB group and the patency rate of AVF were higher than those in the CB group (97.37% vs 89.04%, 86.84% vs 71.23%, respectively; P < .05), and the length of hospital stay was longer in the DCB group than in the CB group (P < .05). After surgery, the peak flow velocity at the site of fistula stenosis in the DCB group was lower than that in the CB group, whereas the dialysis blood flow and vascular diameter were greater than those in the CB group (P < .05). After surgery, serum levels of angiotensin II, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and ceramide were lower in the DCB group than in the CB group (P < .05). The incidence of complications in the DCB group was lower than that in the CB group (2.63% vs 10.96%; P < .05). Compared with CB, DCB has higher benefits in treating AVF stenosis.

摘要

本研究比较了药物涂层球囊(DCB)和传统球囊(CB)治疗动静脉内瘘(AVF)狭窄的效果。在这项回顾性研究中,我们回顾性分析了2021年6月至2023年10月期间我院收治的149例AVF狭窄患者的临床资料。其中,分别有73例和76例患者接受了CB治疗(CB组)和DCB治疗(DCB组)。比较了两组的治疗效果、狭窄部位的峰值流速、透析血流量、血管直径、生化指标水平及并发症发生率。DCB组的手术成功率和AVF通畅率均高于CB组(分别为97.37%对89.04%,86.84%对71.23%;P<0.05),且DCB组的住院时间长于CB组(P<0.05)。术后,DCB组内瘘狭窄部位的峰值流速低于CB组,而透析血流量和血管直径大于CB组(P<0.05)。术后,DCB组血清血管紧张素II、血管内皮生长因子-A、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1和神经酰胺水平低于CB组(P<0.05)。DCB组并发症发生率低于CB组(2.63%对10.96%;P<0.05)。与CB相比,DCB治疗AVF狭窄具有更高的效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc5/12212832/5f7a922b4429/medi-104-e42977-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验