Kumar Shaji K, Harrison Simon J, Cavo Michele, de la Rubia Javier, Popat Rakesh, Gasparetto Cristina, Hungria Vania, Salwender Hans, Suzuki Kenshi, Kim Inho, Onishi Maika, Ku Grace, Pothacamury Rajvineeth, Jalaluddin Muhammad, Zeng Jiewei, Ross Jeremy A, Dobkowska Edyta, Moreau Philippe
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Lancet Haematol. 2025 Aug;12(8):e574-e587. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00139-5. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
The phase 3 BELLINI primary endpoint was met, showing superior progression-free survival with venetoclax versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma as assessed by an independent review committee. However, venetoclax showed increased early mortality. Here, we report the final overall survival analysis.
The randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 BELLINI study enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, and one to three previous therapies, across 90 hospitals in 16 countries. Eligible patients were centrally randomly assigned (2:1, stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor exposure and number of previous lines of therapies) via interactive response technology system (block size 3) to once-daily venetoclax (800 mg orally) or placebo with bortezomib (1·3 mg/m subcutaneously or intravenously) and dexamethasone (20 mg orally), administered in 21-day cycles for initial eight cycles, followed by 35-day cycles until discontinuation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population; this analysis reports overall survival and investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02755597) and is completed.
From July 19, 2016, to Oct 31, 2017, 291 patients were assigned to venetoclax (n=194) or placebo (n=97); 33 patients (28 in the venetoclax group and five in the placebo group) remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. Of the 291 patients, 152 (52%) were men and 139 (48%) were women. 87 (30%) of 291 patients were Asian, 12 (4%) were Black or African American, 190 (65%) were White, and 32 (11%) were Hispanic or Latino. At 45·6 months (IQR 43·6-48·3) median follow-up, median overall survival was not reached in the venetoclax group (not reached [NR] [95% CI 44·4-not estimable]) or in the placebo group (NR [95% CI 44·0-not estimable]; HR 1·19 [95% CI 0·80-1·77]); p=0·39). Median progression-free survival was 23·4 months (95% CI 16·2-26·4) with venetoclax versus 11·4 months (95% CI 9·5-14·6) with placebo (HR 0·58 [95% CI 0·43-0·78]; p=0·00026). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (51 [26%] of 193 in the venetoclax group vs 38 [40%] of 96 in the placebo group]) and neutropenia (58 [30%] of 193 vs eight [8%] of 96 patients). Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (2%) of 193 patients in the venetoclax group (two patients with pneumonia, one with death, and one with both multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and septic shock) and none in the placebo group.
Final overall survival analysis in the BELLINI study showed overall survival favouring placebo over venetoclax and progression-free survival favouring venetoclax over placebo, indicating venetoclax usage should be avoided in the general relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma population.
AbbVie and Genentech.
3期BELLINI试验达到了主要终点,独立审查委员会评估显示,与安慰剂联合硼替佐米和地塞米松相比,维奈托克用于复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者时无进展生存期更优。然而,维奈托克显示早期死亡率增加。在此,我们报告最终的总生存期分析。
随机、双盲、多中心3期BELLINI研究纳入了18岁及以上、复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为2或更低、既往接受过1至3线治疗的患者,研究在16个国家的90家医院开展。符合条件的患者通过交互式响应技术系统(分组块大小为3)进行中心随机分组(2:1,按既往蛋白酶体抑制剂暴露情况和既往治疗线数分层),接受每日一次的维奈托克(口服800mg)或安慰剂联合硼替佐米(皮下或静脉注射1.3mg/m²)和地塞米松(口服20mg),初始8个周期采用21天周期给药,之后采用35天周期给药直至停药。主要终点是独立审查委员会在意向性治疗人群中评估的无进展生存期;本分析报告了意向性治疗人群中的总生存期和研究者评估的无进展生存期。对接受至少一剂研究药物的患者进行安全性分析。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT02755597)且已完成。
从2016年7月19日至2017年10月31日,291例患者被分配至维奈托克组(n = 194)或安慰剂组(n = 97);本次分析时,33例患者(维奈托克组28例,安慰剂组5例)仍在接受治疗。291例患者中,152例(52%)为男性, 139例(48%)为女性。在291例患者中,87例(30%)为亚洲人,12例(4%)为黑人或非裔美国人,190例(65%)为白人,32例(11%)为西班牙裔或拉丁裔。在中位随访45.6个月(四分位间距43.6 - 48.3个月)时,维奈托克组(未达到[NR][95%CI 44.4 - 不可估计])和安慰剂组(NR[95%CI 44.0 - 不可估计];风险比1.19[95%CI 0.80 - 1.77])的中位总生存期均未达到;p = 0.39)。维奈托克组中位无进展生存期为23.4个月(95%CI 16.2 - 26.4),而安慰剂组为11.4个月(95%CI 9.5 - 14.6)(风险比0.58[95%CI 0.43 - 0.78];p = 0.00026)。最常见的3级或4级不良事件是血小板减少(维奈托克组193例中有51例[26%],安慰剂组96例中有38例[40%])和中性粒细胞减少(维奈托克组193例中有58例[30%],安慰剂组96例中有8例[8%])。治疗相关不良事件导致维奈托克组193例患者中有4例(2%)死亡(2例肺炎患者,1例死亡,1例同时患有多器官功能障碍综合征和感染性休克),安慰剂组无死亡病例。
BELLINI研究的最终总生存期分析显示,总生存期安慰剂优于维奈托克,无进展生存期维奈托克优于安慰剂,这表明在一般复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤人群中应避免使用维奈托克。
艾伯维和基因泰克。