Wang M N, Liang P F, Bi C L, Huang M T, He Z Y, Zhang P H, Zhou J, Zeng J Z, Lan S, Liu J F
Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 20;41(6):525-533. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250106-00008.
To investigate the repair methods for refractory head wounds involving intracranial structures and their clinical effectiveness. This study was a retrospective observational study. From September 2020 to July 2024, 68 patients with refractory head wounds involving intracranial structures who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (hereinafter referred to as our hospital) and were co-managed with neurosurgeons from our hospital. Among them, 38 were male and 30 were female, aged 1 to 76 years. Based on the causes of difficult wound healing, the refractory head wounds involving intracranial structures were classified into 5 categories: simple tissue defect wounds, simple infectious wounds, implant-related wounds, wounds communicating with paranasal sinuses, and radiation-damaged wounds. Corresponding management plans were adopted according to the wound condition. After wound bed preparation was completed, according to factors such as wound location, size, blood supply condition, need for soft tissue filling, and the patient's general condition, and also following the principle of minimizing damage, patients with no obvious scalp soft tissue defect were sutured directly. For patients with large defects that could not be sutured directly (with wound area of 8 cm×3 cm to 28 cm×13 cm), the most suitable tissue flaps (including pedicled scalp flaps and free tissue flaps) were designed to repair the wounds. The donor site wounds of scalp flaps were directly sutured or repaired by full-thickness skin grafting and the donor site wounds of free tissue flaps were directly sutured. Before surgery, the types of refractory wounds and the microbial culture results of wound exudate specimens were recorded. During surgery, the wound repair methods, types of free tissue flaps, recipient vessels, and vascular anastomosis methods between donor and recipient sites were recorded. After surgery, the recovery of the head wounds and the tissue flap donor sites was observed. The recipient site appearance, blood supply, wound recurrence, and subsequent management were followed up. Among 68 patients, 2 cases had simple tissue defect wounds, 15 cases had simple infectious wounds, 43 cases had implant-related wounds, 4 cases had wounds communicating with paranasal sinuses, and 4 cases had radiation-damaged wounds. Before surgery, the microbial culture results of wound exudate specimens were positive in 28 cases. After wound bed preparation was completed, the wounds of 17 patients were sutured directly, the wounds of 31 patients were repaired with pedicled scalp flap transfer, and the wounds of 20 patients were repaired with free tissue flap transplantation. Of the 20 patients who underwent free tissue flap transplantation for wound repair, 12 patients had the superficial temporal arteries and veins as the recipient vessels and 8 patients had the facial arteries and veins as the recipient vessels. Among them, 2 patients had their blood vessels anastomosed using a flow-through technique, while the remaining 18 patients underwent end-to-end anastomosis between donor and recipient vessels. After surgery, the head wounds of 66 patients healed, and the head wounds of 2 patients did not heal, which healed after undergoing debridement surgery again. All tissue flap donor sites recovered well. During follow-up of 6 to 32 months, all patients had good blood supply in the recipient sites, acceptable head shape, and no wound recurrence. Among them, 4 patients underwent titanium mesh reimplantation after scalp expansion at a later stage, and 2 patients developed new-onset epilepsy which was controlled with medication. Based on an adequate assessment of the causes of difficult wound healing, targeted removal of factors affecting wound healing, and use of direct suture, pedicled scalp flap transfer, or free tissue flap transplantation to repair complex refractory head wounds involving intracranial structures can achieve favorable clinical treatment outcomes.
探讨累及颅内结构的难治性头部伤口的修复方法及其临床疗效。本研究为回顾性观察性研究。2020年9月至2024年7月,68例符合纳入标准的累及颅内结构的难治性头部伤口患者入住中南大学湘雅医院烧伤整形科(以下简称我院),并与我院神经外科医生共同管理。其中,男性38例,女性30例,年龄1至76岁。根据伤口愈合困难的原因,将累及颅内结构的难治性头部伤口分为5类:单纯组织缺损伤口、单纯感染伤口、植入物相关伤口、与鼻窦相通的伤口、放射性损伤伤口。根据伤口情况采取相应的处理方案。完成伤口床准备后,根据伤口位置、大小、血供情况、软组织填充需求以及患者全身状况等因素,并遵循损伤最小化原则,对无明显头皮软组织缺损的患者直接进行缝合。对于无法直接缝合的大缺损患者(伤口面积为8 cm×3 cm至28 cm×13 cm),设计最合适的组织瓣(包括带蒂头皮瓣和游离组织瓣)修复伤口。头皮瓣供区伤口直接缝合或采用全厚皮片移植修复,游离组织瓣供区伤口直接缝合。术前记录难治性伤口类型及伤口渗出物标本的微生物培养结果。术中记录伤口修复方法、游离组织瓣类型、受区血管以及供区与受区血管的吻合方法。术后观察头部伤口及组织瓣供区的恢复情况。对受区外观、血供、伤口复发及后续处理进行随访。68例患者中,单纯组织缺损伤口2例,单纯感染伤口15例,植入物相关伤口43例,与鼻窦相通的伤口4例,放射性损伤伤口4例。术前伤口渗出物标本微生物培养结果阳性28例。完成伤口床准备后,17例患者的伤口直接缝合,31例患者的伤口采用带蒂头皮瓣转移修复,20例患者的伤口采用游离组织瓣移植修复。在20例接受游离组织瓣移植修复伤口的患者中,12例以颞浅动静脉为受区血管,8例以面动静脉为受区血管。其中,2例采用血流桥接技术吻合血管,其余18例供区与受区血管进行端端吻合。术后,66例患者的头部伤口愈合,2例患者的头部伤口未愈合,再次清创手术后愈合。所有组织瓣供区恢复良好。在6至32个月的随访期间,所有患者受区血供良好,头部外形可,无伤口复发。其中,4例患者后期头皮扩张后行钛网再植入,2例患者新发癫痫,经药物控制。基于对伤口愈合困难原因的充分评估,针对性去除影响伤口愈合的因素,并采用直接缝合、带蒂头皮瓣转移或游离组织瓣移植修复累及颅内结构的复杂难治性头部伤口,可取得良好的临床治疗效果。