Decker L, von Holt I, Ünlü S, Walter U, Röding D
Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Prev Sci. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01823-w.
To date, few evidence-based prevention programs (EBP) have been implemented in Germany, despite their growing availability. Some prevention researchers have stated that prevention support systems such as Communities That Care (CTC) could contribute to the wider spread of EBP in Germany and improve the fidelity of EBP implementation. Our study aims to investigate whether CTC leads to greater adoption of EBP in German communities. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 22 intervention communities (IC) and 22 comparison communities (CC). Data collection occurred at two time points (T0: 2021/2022 and T1: 2023/2024), capturing information on which EBP were implemented in these communities during the prior school year, the number of people reached, and the quality of EBP implementation. Data from 17 IC and 12 CC were included in the final analyses. At T0, there were no significant differences between IC and CC in the number of EBP implemented or the number of people reached. In the IC, the average number of EBP implemented was 3.57 per 10,000 residents at T0, which increased significantly to 8.57 at T1 (p = .004). In the CC, the average number rose from 1.88 at T0 to 3.41 at T1, though this change was not statistically significant (p = .089). Regarding reach, an average of 140 people per 10,000 residents were reached with EBP at T0 in IC, increasing to 407 by T1, while in CC, the average increased from 77 at T0 to 300 at T1. Neither group showed a statistically significant increase in reach. Implementation fidelity remained consistently high in both groups at both time points. The results suggest that CTC may encourage communities to implement more EBP. However, the findings may be influenced by confounding factors and the relatively short observation period. Further research with an extended follow-up is therefore recommended.
迄今为止,尽管基于证据的预防项目(EBP)越来越容易获得,但在德国实施的此类项目却很少。一些预防研究人员表示,诸如关爱社区(CTC)这样的预防支持系统有助于EBP在德国更广泛地传播,并提高EBP实施的保真度。我们的研究旨在调查CTC是否会导致德国社区更多地采用EBP。我们进行了一项准实验研究,涉及22个干预社区(IC)和22个对照社区(CC)。在两个时间点(T0:2021/2022年和T1:2023/2024年)进行了数据收集,获取了关于这些社区在上一学年实施了哪些EBP、覆盖人数以及EBP实施质量的信息。最终分析纳入了17个IC和12个CC的数据。在T0时,IC和CC在实施的EBP数量或覆盖人数方面没有显著差异。在IC中,T0时每10000名居民实施的EBP平均数量为3.57项,到T1时显著增加到8.57项(p = 0.004)。在CC中,平均数量从T0时的1.88项增加到T1时的3.41项,不过这一变化在统计学上不显著(p = 0.089)。关于覆盖范围,IC中T0时每10000名居民平均有140人接受了EBP,到T1时增加到407人,而在CC中,平均数量从T0时的77人增加到T1时的300人。两组的覆盖范围均未显示出统计学上的显著增加。在两个时间点,两组的实施保真度均一直保持较高水平。结果表明,CTC可能会鼓励社区实施更多的EBP。然而,研究结果可能受到混杂因素和相对较短观察期的影响。因此,建议进行进一步的长期随访研究。