美沙酮及丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗的持续时间。

Duration of Methadone and Buprenorphine-Naloxone Treatment.

作者信息

Kleinman Robert A, Kurdyak Paul

机构信息

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2518389. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.18389.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Fentanyl has spread through the illicit opioid supply in Canada, driving increasing overdose deaths. However, the effectiveness of methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone in treating opioid use disorder during the fentanyl era is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone treatment duration, a core effectiveness outcome in the treatment of opioid use disorder, in Ontario, Canada, between 2014 and 2022.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based, retrospective cohort study included individuals who initiated methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone between January 2014 and December 2022 in Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed from July 18, 2023, to June 11, 2025.

EXPOSURE

Period of medication initiation (2014-2016, 2017-2019, or 2020-2022).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was treatment duration, measured as time to medication discontinuation (5 consecutive days without dispensation of the initial opioid agonist treatment or availability of take-home doses).

RESULTS

The cohort included 72 717 new recipients of opioid agonist treatments (45 256 [62.2%] male; median [IQR] age, 35 [28-46] years), with 34 538 individuals (47.5%) receiving methadone and 38 179 individuals (52.5%) receiving buprenorphine-naloxone. Among individuals starting methadone, median treatment duration decreased from 193 (95% CI, 185-202) days in 2014 to 2016 to 139 (95% CI, 130-149) days in 2017 to 2019 and 86 (95% CI, 78-95) days in 2020 to 2022. Among individuals starting buprenorphine-naloxone, median treatment duration decreased from 51 (95% CI, 49-54) days in 2014 to 2016 and 50 (95% CI, 48-53) days in 2017 to 2019 to 38 (95% CI, 36-40) days in 2020 to 2022. In adjusted Cox regression models including time-varying effects and using 2014 to 2016 as the reference period, hazards of discontinuation measured at treatment initiation were higher during later periods of methadone initiation (2017-2019: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.22]; P < .001; 2020-2022: aHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.39-1.51]; P < .001) and for buprenorphine-naloxone initiation in 2020 to 2022 (aHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.08-1.15]; P < .001). Age categories, neighborhood income quintile, rurality, sex, and number of comorbidities were also associated with time to discontinuation in adjusted models.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found that treatment duration among individuals starting methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone during 2020 to 2022 was lower than during 2014 to 2016. This study highlights the importance of ongoing evaluation of treatment effectiveness, given the dynamic nature of the opioid crisis. Further research is needed to improve treatment retention and improve the effectiveness of opioid use disorder treatment.

摘要

重要性

芬太尼已在加拿大非法阿片类药物供应中扩散,导致过量用药死亡人数不断增加。然而,在芬太尼时代,美沙酮和丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的有效性尚不清楚。

目的

评估2014年至2022年期间加拿大安大略省美沙酮和丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮的治疗持续时间,这是治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的一项核心有效性指标。

设计、背景和参与者:这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究纳入了2014年1月至2022年12月期间在加拿大安大略省开始使用美沙酮或丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮的个体。数据于2023年7月18日至2025年6月11日进行分析。

暴露因素

药物起始时间(2014 - 2016年、2017 - 2019年或2020 - 2022年)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是治疗持续时间,以停药时间来衡量(连续5天未配发初始阿片类激动剂治疗药物或没有带回家剂量)。

结果

该队列包括72717名阿片类激动剂治疗的新接受者(45256名[62.2%]男性;年龄中位数[四分位间距]为35[28 - 46]岁),其中34538人(47.5%)接受美沙酮治疗,38179人(52.5%)接受丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮治疗。在开始使用美沙酮的个体中,治疗持续时间中位数从2014年至2016年的193(95%置信区间,185 - 202)天降至2017年至2019年的139(95%置信区间,130 - 149)天以及2020年至2022年的86(95%置信区间,78 - 95)天。在开始使用丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮的个体中,治疗持续时间中位数从2014年至2016年的51(95%置信区间,49 - 54)天和2017年至2019年的50(95%置信区间,48 - 53)天降至2020年至2022年的38(95%置信区间,36 - 40)天。在包含时间变化效应并以2014年至2016年作为参考期的校正Cox回归模型中,在美沙酮起始较晚时期(2017 - 2019年:校正风险比[aHR],1.18[95%置信区间,1.15 - 1.22];P < .001;2020 - 2022年:aHR,1.45[95%置信区间,1.39 - 1.51];P < .001)以及2020年至2022年开始使用丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮时(aHR,1.11[95%置信区间,1.08 - 1.15];P < .001),起始治疗时测量的停药风险更高。在校正模型中,年龄类别、邻里收入五分位数、农村地区、性别和合并症数量也与停药时间相关。

结论与意义

这项队列研究发现,2020年至2022年期间开始使用美沙酮和丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮的个体的治疗持续时间低于2014年至2016年期间。鉴于阿片类药物危机的动态性质,本研究强调了持续评估治疗效果的重要性。需要进一步研究以提高治疗依从性并改善阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b9f/12215571/c780033eef5c/jamanetwopen-e2518389-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索