Suppr超能文献

大学生学业倦怠量表的编制与验证

Development and validation of academic involution scale for college students.

作者信息

He Yiqing, Liu Xinyi

机构信息

School of Education, Tianjin University, Building#33, Beiyang Campus, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20876. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04850-3.

Abstract

To develop a scale for assessing the involution among Chinese college students, and to test its reliability and validity within the context of higher education. The scale was developed based on in-depth interviews and existing competition scales. dataset 1 (n = 220) was utilized for exploratory factor analysis, and dataset 2 (n = 500) was employed for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), convergent validity and discriminant validity test, reliability test, criterion validity test, and difference analysis on demographics. The final scale comprises 26 items across six factors: excessive comparison (EC), futile effort (FE), hyper-competition (HC), negative moods (NM), academic opportunism (AO), and vicious competition (VC). The six factor model showed satisfactory model fit in CFA: χ/df = 2.493, NFI = 0.940, CFI = 0.963, RMSEA = 0.055. Standardized factor loadings ranged from 0.593 to 0.902. Composite reliability (CR) values were greater than 0.7.and average variance extracted (AVE) values were predominantly higher than 0.45. Discriminant validity test found that six factor model showed the best model fit than less factors. Criterion validity test indicated that the six factors of academic involution were significantly correlated with academic anxiety. The reliability of each factor ranged from 0.763 to 0.838, split-half reliability was 0.760, demonstrating satisfactory reliability. There were significant differences in academic involution in terms of institutional tier and grade point average (GPA) ranking. This study initially identified the main characteristics of academic involution among college students. The developed scale has good reliability and validity and can be used as a measurement tool.

摘要

开发一个用于评估中国大学生内卷程度的量表,并在高等教育背景下检验其信效度。该量表基于深度访谈和现有的竞争量表编制而成。数据集1(n = 220)用于探索性因素分析,数据集2(n = 500)用于验证性因素分析(CFA)、收敛效度和区分效度检验、信度检验、效标效度检验以及人口统计学差异分析。最终量表包含26个项目,涵盖六个因子:过度比较(EC)、徒劳努力(FE)、过度竞争(HC)、负面情绪(NM)、学术投机主义(AO)和恶性竞争(VC)。六因子模型在CFA中显示出良好的模型拟合度:χ/df = 2.493,NFI = 0.940,CFI = 0.963,RMSEA = 0.055。标准化因子载荷范围为0.593至0.902。组合信度(CR)值大于0.7,平均方差抽取(AVE)值大多高于0.45。区分效度检验发现,六因子模型比因子较少的模型拟合度最佳。效标效度检验表明,学术内卷的六个因子与学术焦虑显著相关。各因子的信度范围为0.763至0.838,分半信度为0.760,显示出令人满意的信度。在学校层次和平均绩点(GPA)排名方面,学术内卷存在显著差异。本研究初步确定了大学生学术内卷的主要特征。所开发的量表具有良好的信效度,可作为一种测量工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验