• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受新辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者的姑息治疗发生率:巴西公共卫生系统分析

Incidence of palliative treatment among breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy: an analysis of the Brazilian public health system.

作者信息

Silva Ana Maria Fantini, Piva Breno, Nunes Marco Antônio Prado

机构信息

Health Sciences Graduate Program (PPGCS), Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.

Department of Medicine (DME), Federal University of Sergipe, Campus Prof. João Cardoso Nascimento, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06113-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-06113-7
PMID:40594773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12219576/
Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women globally, including Brazil. This study assesses neoadjuvant treatment patterns, the impact of new therapies, and factors determining palliative care for patients who failed initial treatments. A historical cohort study using secondary data from DATASUS (2008-2017) focused on women aged 18-90 with stages II and III breast cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment. Data on chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and anti-HER2 treatment were analyzed. The Palliative Treatment Rate (PTR) was calculated by cross-referencing neoadjuvant treatment records with subsequent palliative care records, indicating cases where the initial curative intent was not achieved. The study included 71,181 patients, with a mean age of 51.5 years. Most were diagnosed at Stage III (85%). Anti-HER2 therapy was introduced in 2013, with 10.5% receiving it. The 5-year PTR decreased from 44% (2008-2012) to 36% (2013-2017). The combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and anti-HER2 therapy had the lowest PTR. Logistic regression identified younger age, higher histological grade, Stage III disease, and compromised lymph nodes as factors increasing the likelihood of needing palliative care, while HER2 positivity and hormonal therapy reduced it. Regional disparities were observed, with patients from the Southeast more likely to receive palliative care. Early diagnosis and access to anti-HER2 therapy significantly reduce palliative care needs. Socio-economic and regional disparities in treatment highlight the need for equitable access to diagnostic tools and therapies to improve survival outcomes in Brazil's public healthcare system.

摘要

乳腺癌是全球女性(包括巴西女性)癌症相关死亡的主要原因。本研究评估新辅助治疗模式、新疗法的影响以及决定对初始治疗失败患者进行姑息治疗的因素。一项历史性队列研究使用了来自巴西卫生信息系统(DATASUS,2008 - 2017年)的二手数据,重点关注年龄在18 - 90岁、患有II期和III期乳腺癌且接受新辅助治疗的女性。对化疗、激素治疗和抗HER2治疗的数据进行了分析。姑息治疗率(PTR)通过将新辅助治疗记录与随后的姑息治疗记录交叉对照来计算,以表明初始治愈意图未实现的病例。该研究纳入了71,181名患者,平均年龄为51.5岁。大多数患者在III期被诊断出(85%)。抗HER2疗法于2013年引入,10.5%的患者接受了该疗法。5年姑息治疗率从2008 - 2012年的44%降至2013 - 2017年的36%。化疗、内分泌治疗和抗HER2治疗联合使用时的姑息治疗率最低。逻辑回归分析确定年龄较小、组织学分级较高、III期疾病以及淋巴结受累是增加需要姑息治疗可能性的因素,而HER2阳性和激素治疗则降低了这种可能性。观察到存在地区差异,东南部的患者更有可能接受姑息治疗。早期诊断和获得抗HER2疗法可显著降低对姑息治疗的需求。治疗方面的社会经济和地区差异凸显了在巴西公共医疗系统中公平获得诊断工具和疗法以改善生存结果的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c14/12219576/0872c1346897/41598_2025_6113_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c14/12219576/c099e5a23068/41598_2025_6113_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c14/12219576/0872c1346897/41598_2025_6113_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c14/12219576/c099e5a23068/41598_2025_6113_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c14/12219576/0872c1346897/41598_2025_6113_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Incidence of palliative treatment among breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy: an analysis of the Brazilian public health system.接受新辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者的姑息治疗发生率:巴西公共卫生系统分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06113-7.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
4
Clinical efficacy and therapy response prediction of neoadjuvant dalpiciclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- stage II-III breast cancer (DARLING 01): a single-arm, open-label, exploratory study.新辅助达尔西利联合来曲唑治疗绝经后HR+/HER2- II-III期乳腺癌的临床疗效及治疗反应预测(DARLING 01):一项单臂、开放标签的探索性研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2025 Feb 13;27(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-01976-0.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
7
Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care.用于癌症患者和接受姑息治疗患者的阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD006332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006332.pub3.
8
National trends in neoadjuvant systemic therapy utilization in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 2016-2021: The impact of the KATHERINE trial.2016 - 2021年早期HER2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助全身治疗使用情况的全国趋势:KATHERINE试验的影响
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07750-2.
9
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure.针对接受根治性手术的直肠癌患者的术后辅助化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004078.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2024 Jun 11;331(22):1918-1930. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.5534.
2
Treatment utilization and effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing men and women diagnosed with breast cancer: a Swedish retrospective cohort study.比较男女乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗的利用情况和疗效:一项瑞典回顾性队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan;203(2):235-243. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07129-1. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
Breast cancer survival and the health system in Brazil: an analysis of public and private healthcare.
巴西的乳腺癌生存率与医疗体系:公立与私立医疗保健分析
Front Oncol. 2023 May 25;13:927748. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.927748. eCollection 2023.
4
Generalized pairwise comparisons for censored data: An overview.广义配对比较在截尾数据中的应用:综述。
Biom J. 2023 Feb;65(2):e2100354. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100354. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Breast Cancer Treatment Delay in SafetyNet Health Systems, Houston Versus Southeast Brazil.安全网健康系统中,休斯顿与巴西南部乳腺癌治疗延迟的比较。
Oncologist. 2022 May 6;27(5):344-351. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac050.
6
Event-free Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.帕博利珠单抗治疗早期三阴性乳腺癌无事件生存。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 10;386(6):556-567. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112651.
7
Prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective cohort.三阴性乳腺癌的预后因素:回顾性队列研究。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2021 Jul;67(7):950-957. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20210249.
8
Count Data in Medical Research: Poisson Regression and Negative Binomial Regression.医学研究中的计数数据:泊松回归和负二项回归。
Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):1378-1379. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005398.
9
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
A multilevel assessment of the social determinants associated with the late stage diagnosis of breast cancer.乳腺癌晚期诊断相关社会决定因素的多层次评估。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 1;11(1):2712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82047-0.